Analysis of Left-Turn Saturation Flow Rates and Capacity at Signalized Intersections

2010 ◽  
Vol 2173 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Heng Wang ◽  
Rahim (Ray) F. Benekohal
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Braun ◽  
John N. Ivan

The current methods for determining average stopped delay at signalized intersections were studied. Field measurements of average stopped delay were obtained and compared with values computed using both the 1985 and 1994 editions of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The 1994 HCM uses an equation to predict the progression adjustment factor (PF), a new technique for determining the left-turn adjustment factor for saturation flow rates, and a new set of equations for determining the uniform delay parameter for left-turn lane groups with primary and secondary phasing. Overall, the 1994 HCM produces better estimates of intersection stopped delay than the 1985 HCM.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4485
Author(s):  
Abdelrahman Abuhijleh ◽  
Charitha Dias ◽  
Wael Alhajyaseen ◽  
Deepti Muley

The Saturation Flow Rate (SFR) is a primary measure that can be used when estimating intersection capacity. Further, the efficiency of signal control parameters also depends on the accuracy of assumed SFR values. Driver behavior, type of movement, vehicle type, intersection layout, and other factors may have a significant impact on the saturation flow rate. Thus, it is expected that driving environments that have heterogeneous driver populations with different driving habits and cultures may have different SFRs. In practice, the proposed SFRs based on US standards (Highway Capacity Manual, 2016) have been adopted in the State of Qatar without validation or calibration to consider the local road environment and the characteristics of the driving population. This study aims to empirically analyze the saturation flow rates for exclusive left-turn lanes and shared left- and U-turn lanes at two signalized intersections in Doha city, while considering the effects of heavy vehicles and U-turn maneuvers. Empirical observations revealed that the average base SFR, i.e., when the influences from heavy vehicles and U-turns were excluded, could vary approximately from 1800 vehicles per hour per lane (vphpl) to 2100 vphpl for exclusive left-turning lanes and approximately from 1800 vphpl to 1900 vphpl for shared left- and U-turning lanes. Furthermore, this study proposed different adjustment factors for heavy vehicle and U-turn percentages which can be applied in practice in designing signalized intersections, particularly in the State of Qatar.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengtao Qin ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Shidong Liang ◽  
Jiao Yao

Many intersections around the world are irregular crossings where the approach and exit lanes are offset or the two roads cross at oblique angles. These irregular intersections often confuse drivers and greatly affect operational efficiency. Although guideline markings are recommended in many design manuals and codes on traffic signs and markings to address these problems, the effectiveness and application conditions are ambiguous. The research goal was to analyze the impact of guideline markings on the saturation flow rate at signalized intersections. An adjustment estimation model was established based on field data collected at 33 intersections in Shanghai, China. The proposed model was validated using a before–after case study. The underlying reasons for the impact of intersection guideline markings on the saturation flow rate are discussed. The results reveal that the improvement in the saturation flow rate obtained from painting guide line markings is positively correlated with the number of traffic lanes, offset of through movement, and turning angle of left-turns. On average, improvements of 7.0% and 10.3% can be obtained for through and left-turn movements, respectively.


Author(s):  
Cheng-Tin Gan ◽  
Gary Long

Inadequate driveway corner clearances can result in traffic operational, safety, and capacity problems. These problems can be caused by blocked driveway ingress and egress movements, incomplete turning maneuvers, conflicting intersection turning movements, confusing right-turn signal indications, insufficient weaving and merging section lengths, and various other conflicts. The effects of driveway corner clearances on safety cannot be examined easily through safety records given the current condition of the available crash and system inventory data. This provides incentives for applying theoretical traffic conflict analysis. A simple conflict analysis showed an increase in merging and crossing conflict points for driveways situated near intersections. Inadequate corner clearance can have a capacity-reducing effect. Driveway capacity may be reduced by ( a) vehicles on the arterial blocking driveway egress movements and ( b) a decreased opportunity for left-turn egress movement on arterial streets designed for platoon progression. Intersection capacity can also be reduced by a decrease in saturation flow rates due to driveway ingress and egress movements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document