Metallurgical Failure Investigation of Minor Leakage in a Fuel Oil Return Line of a Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Engine

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 375-387
Author(s):  
B. Fischer ◽  
E. Cagliyan ◽  
A. Neidel
2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-215
Author(s):  
E. Cagliyan ◽  
T. Gädicke ◽  
A. Neidel

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Koblish ◽  
L. M. Nucci

Studies sponsored by the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE) have indicated that the combined cycle, incorporating an open cycle gas turbine having a Low Btu gas (LBG) fueled combustor operating at temperatures over 2600 F and a closed cycle steam turbine can produce cost competitive electric power from gasified coal. For increased efficiency, the coal gasification system would be integrated with the gas turbine which supplies the compressed air for the coal gasification system, and the steam turbine which supplies the steam for the gasification system. The coal gasifier would provide a pressurized low heating value (LBG) fuel (at the order of ISO Btu/SCF (5590 kJ/m3) for combustion in the gas turbine engine. Under DOE sponsorship, one of the gas turbine engine components being investigated both analytically and experimentally, is the LBG fueled combustor. This paper describes the LBG configuration background technology utilized in the design of the combustor and the test program outline for substantiation of the design approach.


Author(s):  
A. A. Shimanov ◽  
◽  
V. V. Biryuk ◽  
L. P. Shelud’ko ◽  
A. A. Gorshkalev

Author(s):  
David Olusina Rowlands ◽  
Mark Savill

In this paper, an economic model is presented for the evaluation of gas turbine total productive life cost and profitability. The model utilizes input from gas turbine engine performance, emissions and lifing models to provide quantitative information on the economic implications of an investigated system or investment option. In this study, the proposed model is used to conduct economic analysis on a turbojet engine, repurposed for alternative profitable use in electrical power generation. Results from the analysis are compared against competitor units to determine the models economic feasibility, benefits and limitations over competitors. Results obtained from the investigation reveal that the repurposed unit is economically feasible and favours profitability at minimal investment costs, with least burden on consumers. At a discount rate of 2.5%, investing in the repurposed engine model offers an investment base 13% lower, NPV 6% higher and an LCOE 24% higher in simple cycle than in combined cycle operation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document