Social impact theory based modeling for security analysis in the nuclear fuel cycle

Kerntechnik ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Ho Woo
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Security Analysis ◽  
Nuclear Fuel Cycle ◽  
Impact Theory

Aluminosilicate-Phosphate Model of Polyphase Matrices for Immobilization of Sr-Cs-fractions of Nuclear Fuel Cycle HLW

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bogdanov ◽  
R. Kuznetsov ◽  
V. Epimahov ◽  
A. Titov ◽  
E. Prudnikov
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Fuel Cycle

A family of uranyl oxide hydrate phases with bivalent cations [MII(H2O)4][(UO2)3O3(OH)2]·H2O (MII – Mn, Co, Ni, Zn): synthesis, characterization and chemical stability in aqueous solutions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolay G. Chernorukov ◽  
Oxana V. Nipruk ◽  
Kseniya A. Klinshova ◽  
Olga N. Tumaeva ◽  
Dmitry V. Sokolov
Keyword(s):  
Aqueous Solutions ◽  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Chemical Stability ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Fuel Cycle ◽  
Oxide Hydrate ◽  
Uranium Compounds ◽  
Bivalent Cations

A series of new uranium compounds [MII(H2O)3][(UO2)3O3(OH)2]·2H2O (MII – Mn, Co, Ni, Zn) were synthesized for binding radionuclides in the environment and nuclear fuel cycle.

Comparison of nuclear data uncertainties with other nuclear fuel cycle uncertainty sources

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aris V. Skarbeli ◽  
Rubén Eusebio‐Yebra ◽  
Pablo Romojaro ◽  
Francisco Álvarez‐Velarde ◽  
Daniel Cano‐Ott
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Data ◽  
Nuclear Fuel Cycle ◽  
Uncertainty Sources

Massimo Salvatores’ seminal ideas and comprehensive views on nuclear fuel cycle studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 108223
Author(s):  
Concetta Fazio ◽  
Fabrizio Gabrielli ◽  
Andrei Rineiski ◽  
Barbara Vezzoni
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Fuel Cycle

scholarly journals Progress in Uranium Chemistry: Driving Advances in Front-End Nuclear Fuel Cycle Forensics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Pastoor ◽  
R. Scott Kemp ◽  
Mark P. Jensen ◽  
Jenifer C. Shafer
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Fuel Cycle ◽  
Front End

scholarly journals The Need for Integrating the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle in the United States of America

MRS Advances ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (19) ◽  
pp. 991-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evaristo J. Bonano ◽  
Elena A. Kalinina ◽  
Peter N. Swift
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
Spent Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Fuel Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Fuel Cycle ◽  
The United States ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Dry Storage ◽  
The Us

ABSTRACTCurrent practice for commercial spent nuclear fuel management in the United States of America (US) includes storage of spent fuel in both pools and dry storage cask systems at nuclear power plants. Most storage pools are filled to their operational capacity, and management of the approximately 2,200 metric tons of spent fuel newly discharged each year requires transferring older and cooler fuel from pools into dry storage. In the absence of a repository that can accept spent fuel for permanent disposal, projections indicate that the US will have approximately 134,000 metric tons of spent fuel in dry storage by mid-century when the last plants in the current reactor fleet are decommissioned. Current designs for storage systems rely on large dual-purpose (storage and transportation) canisters that are not optimized for disposal. Various options exist in the US for improving integration of management practices across the entire back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document