Bearing Steels for Induction Hardening – Part II

2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 218-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wendel ◽  
F. Hoffmann ◽  
W. Datchary
2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wendel ◽  
F. Hoffmann ◽  
W. Datchary

1998 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi INOUE ◽  
Yuzo HOSOI ◽  
Koe NAKAJIMA ◽  
Hiroyuki TAKENAKA ◽  
Tomonori HANYUDA

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (12) ◽  
pp. 781-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. B. Demidovich ◽  
Yu. Yu. Perevalov
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-210
Author(s):  
D. Schlesselmann ◽  
C. Krause ◽  
M. Schaudig
Keyword(s):  

Alloy Digest ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  

Abstract SAE 10053 is an oil or water-hardening machinery and tool steel for applications where a shallow-hardening steel of high strength with moderate toughness meets the requirements. It is commonly used for parts where induction hardening or austempering are employed. SAE 1053 is recommended for agricultural machinery and tools, hand tools, shafts, springs and heavy-machinery parts. This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, hardness, elasticity, and tensile properties. It also includes information on corrosion resistance as well as forming, heat treating, machining, and joining. Filing Code: CS-70. Producer or source: Carbon steel mills.


Alloy Digest ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  

Abstract Ovako 100Cr6 comprises a group of through-hardening bearing steels with modification to improve machining, cold forming, and cleanliness for better fatigue strength. This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, hardness, elasticity, and tensile properties. It also includes information on casting, forming, and heat treating. Filing Code: SA-582. Producer or source: Ovako North America Inc.


2020 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 105485
Author(s):  
X.Z. Liang ◽  
G.-H. Zhao ◽  
J. Owens ◽  
P. Gong ◽  
W.M. Rainforth ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-194
Author(s):  
A. Fischer ◽  
B. Scholtes ◽  
T. Niendorf

Abstract In order to improve properties of complex automotive components, such as crankshafts, in an application-oriented way, several surface hardening treatments can be applied. Concerning the material performance the definition of adequate process parameters influences the resulting surface properties and, thus, the effectiveness of surface hardening treatments. To analyze most relevant process-microstructure-property relationships, the present paper reports results obtained by two different well-established surface hardening procedures, i. e. deep rolling as a mechanical treatment and induction hardening as a thermal treatment. For each hardening process widely used crankshaft steel grades, i. e. a medium carbon 38MnSiVS5 microalloyed steel and a quenched and tempered 42CrMo4 were selected and thoroughly characterized upon processing, using equal parameter settings. The results reveal that deep rolling in contrast to induction hardening proves to be a less sensitive surface layer treatment with regard to small differences in the initial microstructure, the chemical composition and the applied process parameters. Differences in microstructure evolution with respect to the applied surface hardening treatment are studied and discussed for the highly stressed fillet region of automotive crankshaft sections for all conditions. In this context, high-resolution SEM-based techniques such as EBSD and ECCI are proven to be very effective for fast qualitative evaluation of induced microstructural changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document