scholarly journals Fixed Shipping Cost Allocation for Just-in-Time (JIT) Lot-Splitting

2019 ◽  
pp. 212-224
Author(s):  
Joong Son
Keyword(s):  
Cost Allocation ◽  
Just In Time ◽  
Lot Splitting ◽  
Shipping Cost

An online cost allocation model for horizontal supply chains

2021 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 102888
Author(s):  
Han Zou ◽  
Maged M. Dessouky ◽  
Shichun Hu
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chains ◽  
Cost Allocation ◽  
Allocation Model

Just-in-time Training for Medical Emergencies: Computer Versus Paper Checklists for a Tracheal Intubation Task

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Jacob Seagull ◽  
Danny Ho ◽  
James Radcliffe ◽  
Yan Xiao ◽  
Peter Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Just In Time ◽  
Medical Emergencies

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Aspirin versus Oral Anticoagulants after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Italy

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Gianetti ◽  
Gianfranco Gensini ◽  
Raffaele De Caterina
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Interventional Procedures ◽  
Cost Allocation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Effectiveness Analysis ◽  
Artery Disease

SummaryAims. The recent publication of two large trials of secondary prevention of coronary artery disease with oral anticoagulants (WARIS and ASPECT) has caused a revival of the interest for this antithrombotic therapy in a clinical setting where the use of aspirin is common medical practice. Despite this, the preferential use of aspirin has been supported by an American cost-effectiveness analysis (JAMA 1995; 273: 965). Methods and Results. Using the same parameters used in that analysis and incidence of events from the Antiplatelet Trialists Collaboration and the ASPECT study, we re-evaluated the economic odds in favor of aspirin or oral anticoagulants in the Italian Health System, which differs significantly in cost allocation from the United States system and is, conversely, similar to other European settings. Recalculated costs associated with each therapy were 2,150 ECU/ patient/year for oral anticoagulants and 2,187 ECU/patient/year for aspirin. In our analysis, the higher costs of oral anticoagulants versus aspirin due to a moderate excess of bleeding (about 10 ECU/ patient/year) and the monitoring of therapy (168 ECU/ patient/year) are more than offset by an alleged savings for recurrent ischemic syndromes and interventional procedures (249 ECU/ patient/year). Conclusions. Preference of aspirin vs. oral anticoagulants in a pharmaco-economical perspective is highly dependent on the geographical situation whereupon calculations are based. On a pure cost-effectiveness basis, and in the absence of data of direct comparisons between aspirin alone versus I.N.R.-adjusted oral anticoagulants, the latter are not more expensive than aspirin in Italy and, by cost comparisons, in other European countries in the setting of post-myocardial infarction.

Just-in-Time w gospodarstwach rolniczych

2003 ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirosław Wasilewski
Keyword(s):  
Just In Time

Przedstawiono wyniki badań, których celem było określenie możliwości wprowadzenia systemu dostaw na czas środków do produkcji w gospodarstwach rolniczych oraz warunków koniecznych do spełnienia w tym zakresie. Badania przeprowadzono w 2000 roku.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document