scholarly journals Journal of information and organizational sciences

10.31341/jios ◽  
2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Sciences

scholarly journals From #MeToo to #TimesUp: Identifying Next Steps in Sexual Harassment Research in the Organizational Sciences

2020 ◽  
pp. 014920632098051
Author(s):  
Nitya Chawla ◽  
Allison S. Gabriel ◽  
Anne O’Leary Kelly ◽  
Christopher C. Rosen
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Harassment ◽  
Organizational Policies ◽  
Policies And Procedures ◽  
Organizational Scholarship ◽  
Scholarly Attention ◽  
Organizational Sciences

Organizational scholarship on workplace sexual harassment has been dormant in recent decades. Yet, the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements—which have shed critical light on experiences of sexual harassment in organizations—suggests that renewed scholarly attention on this topic is both crucial and warranted. In the current commentary, we provide recommendations for ways that scholars can revitalize attention to this topic, extending both scholarly and practitioner understanding of this phenomenon. In addition, we encourage scholars to begin expanding the conceptualization of sexual harassment to also encompass more subtle forms of harassment. Critically, broadening our scholarly knowledge of workplace sexual harassment can inform organizational policies and procedures aimed toward reducing its prevalence and impact.

Interdisciplinary Models and Frameworks for the Study of Artificial Social Intelligence

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 658-659
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Fiore
Keyword(s):  
Social Cognition ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Social Intelligence ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Interpersonal Interactions ◽  
Collaborative Processes ◽  
Integrate Theory ◽  
Complementary Set ◽  
Organizational Sciences

This symposium provides a complementary set of papers exploring frameworks and models for developing artificial social intelligence (ASI) for teams. ASI consists of components of social cognition that support teamwork and more general interpersonal interactions. Although AI is rapidly evolving and fielded in a variety of operational settings, the implementation of such systems is vastly outpacing our ability to understand how to design and develop technologies appropriately. This symposium is meant to help redress this gap. Consisting of scholars representing the cognitive, computational, and organizational sciences, the papers discuss how they integrate theory and methods to inform development of agents capable of complex collaborative processes. Collectively, these papers synthesize perspectives across disciplines in support of an interdisciplinary research approach for ASL The goal is to contribute to research and development in the area of Human- AI- Robot Teaming effectiveness.

Publishing in the Organizational Sciences.

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 310
Author(s):  
J. G. Hunt ◽  
L. L. Cummings ◽  
Peter J. Frost
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Sciences

Organizational Behavior: Whom Do We Talk to and Who Talks to Us?

1990 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Blackburn
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Behavior ◽  
Citation Analysis ◽  
Time Horizon ◽  
Interdisciplinary Communication ◽  
Organizational Studies ◽  
Modest Increase ◽  
The Past ◽  
Organizational Sciences

Citation analysis of research published in 10 U.S. organizational sciences journals during the past decade provides insights into communications within and among disciplines contributing to the study of organizations. Results suggest that during the 1980s a modest increase in cross-disciplinary communication occurred among authors contributing to these journals. The same conclusions are reached when the time horizon of the study is lengthened to encompass the previous 3 decades. More interdisciplinary communication is needed to improve the quality of organizational studies.

Social Class in the Organizational Sciences: A Conceptual Integration and Meta-Analytic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Caleb Loignon ◽  
David J. Woehr
Keyword(s):  
Social Class ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Conceptual Integration ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Conceptual Clarity ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
Research Questions ◽  
Clear Support ◽  
Future Management ◽  
Organizational Sciences

Social class has become increasingly popular in the organizational sciences. Despite the burgeoning interest in this topic, there remains a great deal of ambiguity concerning the conceptualization and operationalization of social class. For instance, scholars have used income, education, and subjective ratings to measures one’s social class. In order to improve the conceptual clarity of social class, we develop and present a model that draws on the dominant theories of social class from both sociology and psychology while organizing their key principles to explain how social class influences an individual’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. By using this model as a framework, this study attempts to refine the conceptualization of social class by testing core research questions pertaining to the construct validity of this construct. After a comprehensive, interdisciplinary literature search, which yielded over 4,000 effect sizes, we conducted a meta-analysis to test the proposed model. The findings offer clear support for two distinct components of social class (i.e., objective and subjective) that are both highly related to one another and associated with other microlevel constructs (i.e., job attitudes). Given the timeliness and importance of social class, the findings of this conceptual review and empirical meta-analysis offer a means of summarizing this large, interdisciplinary literature while guiding future management research on this critical topic.

Scholarly impact in the organizational sciences in and from Iberoamerica

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-134
Author(s):  
Edgar E. Kausel
Keyword(s):  
Personal Experience ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Personal Account ◽  
Previous Theory ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Scholarly Impact ◽  
Analytical Perspective ◽  
Organizational Sciences

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer the author’s view about the conceptualization of scholarly impact, and some of the challenges young Iberoamerican scholars face to have an impact. Design/methodology/approach – This is a personal account based on previous theory and the author’s personal experience. Findings – The paper presents a short critique of the conceptualization and measurement of scholarly impact, and introduces dimensions and challenges of being a scholar in Iberoamerica. Originality/value – The paper offers an analytical perspective of scholarly impact in Iberoamerica and offers some insights to help overcome different challenges.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document