Ground-cover vegetation in wetland forests of the lower Suwannee River floodplain, Florida, and potential impacts of flow reductions

2002 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Yeganeh ◽  
Seyed jamale Khajedein ◽  
Fazel Amiri ◽  
Abdul Rashid B. Mohamed Shariff

1963 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Heringa ◽  
R. G. H. Cormack

The present paper describes the ground vegetation of even-aged pine stands in West Central Alberta on six different sites and attempts to relate the ground vegetation to soil conditions.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e0117265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Paredes ◽  
Luis Cayuela ◽  
Geoff M. Gurr ◽  
Mercedes Campos

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 060-065
Author(s):  
Mohammad Kanedi ◽  
Nismah Nukmal ◽  
Gina Dania Pratami ◽  
Hajariyah

Spider (Arachnida) is one of the classes of arthropods known to give strong responses to differences in land cover vegetation. This study intended to investigate whether the difference of vegetation types that are located adjacently occupied by the same genera of spiders. Two adjacent areas in Liwa Botanical Garden that covered by two different types vegetation were assigned as the sampling sites. The spiders sampling was carried out over a 100 meter long transect line (5 lines each) by applying active searching and pitfall trapping techniques. There were 21 genera from 9 spider families that were collected from two sampling sites. In the land vegetated with wood, there were 12 genera with 129 specimens. In the herbaceous land, there were 13 spider genera with 120 specimens. The Simpson's index of diversity were 0.7739 and 0.8868, meanwhile the Shannon's index were 1.8575and 2.2831, respectively obtained at herbaceous and woody land. The difference of diversity between two compared sites by Hutcheson t-test was highly significant (α < 0.01). This presumption is also supported by the coefficient of dissimilarity calculated using Sorensen’s index formula (Ss = 75.7575). Thus it can be concluded that the different types of land cover vegetation have a significant impact on the diversity of the dwelling spiders even though the two fields are located adjacent to each other.


1990 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1570-1582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Archambault ◽  
Burton V. Barnes ◽  
John A. Witter

An ecological multifactor approach was used to identify and describe oak ecosystem types in highly disturbed landscapes and fragmented forests in an area of over 19 000 km2 in southeastern Michigan, United States. Eleven upland ecosystems and 1 wetland ecosystem were identified in the field using reconnaissance, plot sampling, and test mapping. Each ecosystem type was a characteristic combination of physiography, soil, and climax vegetation (overstory and ground-cover vegetation). The ecological approach emphasized physiographic and soil factors because of the disturbed state of the vegetation. Of 222 species of ground-cover vegetation, only 68 were used in forming the 13 ecological species groups. White oak (Quercusalba L.) exhibited the largest ecological amplitude of the three major oak species; it occurred on dry to mesic sites. Red oak (Q. rubra L.) occurred on dry-mesic to mesic sites, and black oak (Q. velutina Lam.) was restricted to dry sites. Discriminant analysis was used to examine the distinctness of the upland ecosystems and to compare the error rates of different ecosystem components. The misclassification rates obtained by using all ecosystem components (physiography, soil, ecological species groups, and overstory vegetation) were the lowest: 20% in highly dissected terrain and 34% in flat to gently rolling terrain. However, results obtained with physiography–soil and ecological species group variables were nearly as good as results that added the overstory vegetation. More overlap among ecosystem types and higher misclassification rates were found than in ecosystems of old-growth forests of northern Michigan and oak forests in southwestern Wisconsin where similar methods were used. Nevertheless, for the highly disturbed forests of southern Michigan, the ecological, multifactor landscape approach is a useful and effective method of identifying, describing, and mapping ecosystem types.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Ge ◽  
Peter M. Lafleur ◽  
Elyn R. Humphreys

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nian-Feng Wan ◽  
Xiao-Jun Gu ◽  
Xiang-Yun Ji ◽  
Jie-Xian Jiang ◽  
Ji-Hua Wu ◽  
...  

Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 720 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Villa ◽  
Isabel Rodrigues ◽  
Paula Baptista ◽  
Alberto Fereres ◽  
José Alberto Pereira

The Aphrophoridae family contains important vectors of Xylella fastidiosa, a serious bacterial plant disease. In olive orchards, nymphs usually feed on the ground-cover vegetation. However, detailed information about their populations and host/non-host plants in some regions threatened by Xylella, such as the northeast of Portugal, is very limited. The goal of our work was to identify the vector species, nymphal development period, and their host and non-host herbaceous plants in olive orchards from northeastern Portugal. Ground-cover plant species hosting or not hosting nymphs were identified during the spring of 2017 to 2019 in olive orchards. Nymphal development period, nymph aggregation, and nymph’s preferred feeding height of the ground-cover plants were recorded. The most abundant Aphrophoridae species was Philaenus spumarius followed by Neophilaenus sp. Nymphs developed from April to early May and showed a low number of individuals per foam (generally between one and three). They preferred the middle part of the plants. Philaenus spumarius feeds preferentially on Asteraceae and Fabaceae, and Neophilaenus sp. on Poaceae. Some abundant plants, such as Bromus diandrus, Astragalus pelecinus, Chrysanthemum segetum, Trifolium spp., Caryophyllaceae, and Brassicaceae, were barely colonized by Aphrophoridae nymphs. This knowledge is essential for the selection of the species composition of ground-cover vegetation to minimize the presence of vectors of X. fastidiosa in olive groves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document