scholarly journals Geology and biology of North Atlantic deep-sea cores between Newfoundland and Ireland, Part 9, selenium content and chemical analyses

1942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen Edgington ◽  
H.G. Byers
Palaeontology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 879-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
MORIAKI YASUHARA ◽  
HISAYO OKAHASHI ◽  
THOMAS M. CRONIN

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucía Soliño ◽  
Leticia Vidal-Liñán ◽  
Patricia Pérez-Pérez ◽  
Salvador García-Barcelona ◽  
Francisco Baldó ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (46) ◽  
pp. 11700-11705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Sulpis ◽  
Bernard P. Boudreau ◽  
Alfonso Mucci ◽  
Chris Jenkins ◽  
David S. Trossman ◽  
...  

Oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2 leads to decreased pH, carbonate ion concentration, and saturation state with respect to CaCO3 minerals, causing increased dissolution of these minerals at the deep seafloor. This additional dissolution will figure prominently in the neutralization of man-made CO2. However, there has been no concerted assessment of the current extent of anthropogenic CaCO3 dissolution at the deep seafloor. Here, recent databases of bottom-water chemistry, benthic currents, and CaCO3 content of deep-sea sediments are combined with a rate model to derive the global distribution of benthic calcite dissolution rates and obtain primary confirmation of an anthropogenic component. By comparing preindustrial with present-day rates, we determine that significant anthropogenic dissolution now occurs in the western North Atlantic, amounting to 40–100% of the total seafloor dissolution at its most intense locations. At these locations, the calcite compensation depth has risen ∼300 m. Increased benthic dissolution was also revealed at various hot spots in the southern extent of the Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific Oceans. Our findings place constraints on future predictions of ocean acidification, are consequential to the fate of benthic calcifiers, and indicate that a by-product of human activities is currently altering the geological record of the deep sea.


2004 ◽  
Vol 219 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 297-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Frank ◽  
Martine Paterne ◽  
Linda Ayliffe ◽  
Tjeerd van Weering ◽  
Jean-Pierre Henriet ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Anna de Kluijver ◽  
Klaas G.J. Nierop ◽  
Teresa M. Morganti ◽  
Martijn C. Bart ◽  
Beate M. Slaby ◽  
...  

AbstractSponges produce distinct fatty acids (FAs) that (potentially) can be used as chemotaxonomic and ecological biomarkers to study endosymbiont-host interactions and the functional ecology of sponges. Here, we present FA profiles of five common habitat-building deep-sea sponges (class Demospongiae, order Tetractinellida), which are classified as high microbial abundance (HMA) species. Geodia hentscheli, G. parva, G. atlantica, G. barretti, and Stelletta rhaphidiophora were collected from boreal and Arctic sponge grounds in the North-Atlantic Ocean. Bacterial FAs dominated in all five species and particularly isomeric mixtures of mid-chain branched FAs (MBFAs, 8- and 9-Me-C16:0 and 10 and 11-Me-C18:0) were found in high abundance (together ≥ 20% of total FAs) aside more common bacterial markers. In addition, the sponges produced long-chain linear, mid- and a(i)-branched unsaturated FAs (LCFAs) with a chain length of 24‒28 C atoms and had predominantly the typical Δ5,9 unsaturation, although also Δ9,19 and (yet undescribed) Δ11,21 unsaturations were identified. G. parva and S. rhaphidiophora each produced distinct LCFAs, while G. atlantica, G. barretti, and G. hentscheli produced similar LCFAs, but in different ratios. The different bacterial precursors varied in carbon isotopic composition (δ13C), with MBFAs being more enriched compared to other bacterial (linear and a(i)-branched) FAs. We propose biosynthetic pathways for different LCFAs from their bacterial precursors, that are consistent with small isotopic differences found in LCFAs. Indeed, FA profiles of deep-sea sponges can serve as chemotaxonomic markers and support the conception that sponges acquire building blocks from their endosymbiotic bacteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document