scholarly journals Water-laid volcanic rocks of early Upper Cretaceous age in southwestern Arkansas, southeastern Oklahoma, and northeastern Texas

1929 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.S. Ross ◽  
H.D. Miser ◽  
L.W. Stephenson
Keyword(s):  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Early Upper

Petrogenesis of the Upper Cretaceous volcanism in the Kefken region, Western Pontides, NW Turkey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Turgut Duzman ◽  
Ezgi Sağlam ◽  
Aral I. Okay
Keyword(s):  
Rare Earth ◽  
Rare Earth Elements ◽  
Partial Melting ◽  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Early Eocene ◽  
Heavy Rare Earth ◽  
Heavy Rare Earth Elements ◽  
Cretaceous Volcanism ◽  
Oceanic Slab

<p>The Upper Cretaceous volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks crop out along the Black Sea coastline in Turkey. They are part of a magmatic arc that formed as a result of northward subduction of the Tethys ocean beneath the southern margin of Laurasia. The lower part of the Upper Cretaceous volcanism in the Kefken region, 100 km northeast of Istanbul, is represented by basaltic andesites, andesites, agglomerates and tuffs, which have yielded Late Cretaceous (Campanian, ca. 83 Ma) U-Pb zircon ages. The volcanic and volcanoclastic rocks are stratigraphically overlain by shallow to deep marine limestones, which range in age from Late Campanian to Early Eocene.  Geochemically, basaltic andesites and andesites display negative anomalies in Nb, Ta and Ti, enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (LILE) relative to high field strength elements (HFSE). Light rare earth elements (LREE) show slightly enrichment relative to heavy rare earth elements (La<sub>cn</sub>/Yb<sub>cn</sub> =2.51-3.63) and there are slight negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.71-0.95) in basaltic andesite and andesite samples. The geochemical data indicate that Campanian volcanic rocks were derived from the partial melting of the mantle wedge induced by hydrous fluids released by dehydration of the subducted oceanic slab.</p><p>There is also a horizon of volcanic rocks, about 230 m thick, within the Late Campanian-Early Eocene limestone sequence.  This volcanic horizon, which consists of pillow basalts, porphyritic basalts,  andesites and dacites, is of Maastrichtian age based on paleontological data from the intra-pillow sediments and U-Pb zircon ages from the andesites and dacites (72-68 Ma).  The Maastrichtian andesites and dacites are geochemically distinct from the Campanian volcanic rocks. They show distinct adakite-like geochemical signatures with high ratios of Sr/Y (>85.5), high La<sub>cn</sub>/Yb<sub>cn </sub>(16.4-23.7) ratios, low content of Y (7.4-8.6 ppm) and low content of heavy rare-earth elements (HREE). The adakitic rocks most probably formed as a result of partial melting of the subducting oceanic slab under garnet and amphibole stable conditions.</p><p>The Upper Cretaceous arc sequence in the Kefken region shows a change from typical subduction-related magmas to adakitic ones, accompanied by decrease in the volcanism.</p><p> </p><p> </p>

Geochemistry and tectonic environment of the Şarkışla area volcanic rocks in central Anatolia, Turkey

1987 ◽  
Vol 51 (362) ◽  
pp. 553-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gökten ◽  
P. A. Floyd
Keyword(s):  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Active Continental Margin ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Central Anatolia ◽  
Magmatic Arc ◽  
Early Tertiary ◽  
Tectonic Environment ◽  
Geochemical Study ◽  
Lithological Composition ◽  
Back Arc

AbstractThe volcanic rocks of the Şarkışla area in northeastern central Anatolia are associated with volcaniclastics, turbiditic limestones and pelagic-hemipelagic shales of Upper Cretaceous-Palaeocene age. A preliminary geochemical study was undertaken to constrain local tectonic models, and due to the variable altered nature of the volcanics, determine the lithological composition and magma type. Chemically the volcanics are an andesite-dominated suite of calc-alkali lavas, probably developed adjacent to an active continental margin in a local (ensialic back-arc?) basinal area. The volcanic activity was probably related to a postulated magmatic arc just south of the area during the early Tertiary.

HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE MESOZOIC AND BASAL TERTIARY OF THE GIPPSLAND BASIN: A STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

1972 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 138 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Haskell
Keyword(s):  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Sedimentary Rocks ◽  
Economic Potential ◽  
The West ◽  
Stratigraphic Analysis ◽  
Structural Framework ◽  
Marine Influence ◽  
Gippsland Basin ◽  
North And South ◽  
Early Upper

A thick sequence of uppermost Jurassic, Cretaceous and basal Tertiary non-marine sedimentary rocks underlies the Gippsland area of Victoria. The older part of this sequence is extensively exposed in the west of the Gippsland area, but elsewhere it is known dominantly from well intersections. Although several hiates are recognised, palynological data indicate that a comparatively complete Cretaceous section can be compiled from this sequence in the Gippsland area.The uppermost Jurassic to Paleocene rocks can be divided into three units. The oldest unit is uppermost Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous in age. It consists of variably compacted greywackes and lithic sandstones, minor arkoses and interbedded siltstones and mudstones. The overlying early Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene units are distinguishable paleontologically and consist of quartzose sandstones, carbonaceous siltstones and mudstones.There is no indication of marine influence on sedimentation present in the microfossil content of any of the palynotogical preparations from samples taken throughout most of the sequence. Several species of microplankton are common in the oldest unit, but they are indicative of the lacustrine conditions under which the unit was deposited.Minor hydrocarbon shows have been recorded from the oldest unit, but the sandstones are characteristically tight. More significant shows have been reported from the two younger units that contain relatively clean sandstones interbedded with siltstones and mudstones. These units possess the greatest economic potential of all of the pre-Eocene rocks of the Gippsland Basin.The structural framework of the region is composed of separate series of north-easterly and easterly trending faults or monoclines and a south-easterly regional dip. Differential movements of blocks defined by this fault-monocline pattern appears to have resulted in erosion of the more prospective early Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene strata from all but two subrectangular areas respectively immediately north and south of Seaspray.

A Paleomagnetic Study of the Tectonic Deformation in Circum-Marmara Region, NW Anatolia, during the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Period

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Semih Cabuk ◽  
Mualla Cengiz
Keyword(s):  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Rock Magnetism ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
High Coercivity ◽  
The Black Sea ◽  
Tectonic Deformation ◽  
Marmara Region ◽  
Magnetic Minerals ◽  
Single Plate ◽  
Paleomagnetic Study

<p>The Marmara region is located on the Alpine Himalayan orogenic belt which experienced a active tectonic deformation. The region consists of tectonic units such as the Istanbul Zone, the Strandja Zone and the Sakarya Continent. It is reported in the previous geological studies that the Istanbul Zone began to move southwards appart from the Moesia Platform with the effect of West Blacksea Fault in the west and West Crimea Fault in the east after the the opening of the Black Sea in the Cretaceous. It is known that the Intra Pontide suture is formed after the closure of the Intra-Pontide ocean during the Early Eocene due to the collision between İstanbulzone and the Sakarya continent which moved northwards. As a result of the continental collision, the region has completed its evolution under the influence of basin formation and the emplacement of North Anatolian Fault Zone from Miocene to the present.</p><p> </p><p>In this study, Upper Cretaceous-Oligocene sedimentary and volcanic rocks were sampled at 103 sites to investigate the tectonic deformation of the area. As a result of rock magnetism studies, it was shown that magnetic minerals in sedimentary and volcanic rocks are defined by titanium-rich titanomagnetite showing low coercivity, while in limestone samples, magnetization is defined by hematite showing high coercivity. As a result of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) measurements, it was observed that most of the samples show magnetic foliation and a deformation ellipsoid which is oblate. Paleomagnetic results show counterclockwise rotation of 19.9°±10.9° for the Sakarya continent, 27.4°±11.6°for the Pontides and 15.6°±11.8°for the Strandja Zone from Eocene to present. The results indicate that the region has completed the collision in Eocene and rotated counterclockwise as a large block. Deformation due to basin development or fault bounded block rotations which developed after Miocene could not been detected in this study. Miocene paleomagnetic data from previous studies in the study area are compatible with counterclockwise rotations in Upper Cretaceous-Oligocene which shows that different blocks emplaced in the study area moved together as a single plate during Eocene-Miocene time.</p>

Nomenclatorial note on Bernaeinae (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, Aleyrodidae)

Zootaxa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4881 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-596
Author(s):  
DMITRY E. SHCHERBAKOV ◽  
JOWITA DROHOJOWSKA ◽  
JACEK SZWEDO
Keyword(s):  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Fossil Record ◽  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Early Upper

The Bernaeinae, currently regarded as a subfamily of Aleyrodidae (Szwedo & Drohojowska 2016, Drohojowska et al. 2019), is the only extinct subfamily of whiteflies with a fossil record from the Callovian (late Middle Jurassic) to Cenomanian (early Upper Cretaceous). Currently, it comprises seven species in six genera (Schlee 1970, Shcherbakov 2000, Drohojowska et al. 2019, Chen et al. 2020)—Bernaea neocomica Schlee, 1970; Burmoselis evelynae Shcherbakov, 2000; Heidea cretacica Schlee, 1970 (see comment below); Juleyrodes Shcherbakov, 2000 (J. gilli Shcherbakov, 2000, J. visnyai Shcherbakov, 2000), Paraburmoselis kachinensis Chen, Zhang, Wang et Zheng, 2020 and Sinicoselis weberi Drohojowska, Wegierek, Evans et Huang, 2019. Heidea by mistake was figured in Drohojowska & Szwedo (2011a, p. 192, Fig. 23) in Aleyrodinae, but no taxonomic decisions were taken regarding this fossil. Later, in the checklist of fossil Aleyrodidae, Szwedo & Drohojowska (2016: supplement p. 6), listed Heidea in Bernaeinae. This statement was not noted by Chen et al. (2020) listing again Heidea in Aleyrodinae referring to erroneous placement on the figure in Drohojowska & Szwedo (2011a).

Mineralogy and origin of the upper Eastend and Whitemud Formations of south-central and southwestern Saskatchewan and southeastern Alberta

1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. N. Byers
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Weathering ◽  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Source Area ◽  
Heavy Minerals ◽  
Major Constituent ◽  
Abrupt Decrease ◽  
South Central ◽  
Mechanical Weathering ◽  
Kaolinitic Clay

The Upper Cretaceous non-marine Whitemud Formation of south-central and southwestern Saskatchewan and southeastern Alberta consists of kaolinitic, metamorphic lithic sands and silts, and kaolinitic clays. The sands and silts are not highly feldspathic as was originally thought. The major constituent is metamorphic lithic grains with minor kaolinitic clay and vermicular kaolin, clear angular quartz, chert, muscovite, and minor volcanic lithic grains and feldspar. The upper part of the Upper Cretaceous Eastend Formation, which conformably underlies the Whitemud Formation, consists of non-marine sands, silts, and clays. Kaolin is very rare. The bulk of the sands are composed of volcanic lithic grains with minor metamorphic lithic grains, clear angular quartz, chert, feldspar, muscovite, and biotite.The contact is characterized by the following changes from the Eastend Formation upward into the Whitemud Formation: an abrupt decrease in volcanic lithic grains and increase in metamorphic lithic grains; the appearance of kaolin and the disappearance of biotite and apatite; a slight increase in clear angular quartz and muscovite and a decrease in feldspar; a general increase in metamorphic heavy minerals; and an increase in the percentage of ilmenite (both as solitary grains and intergrown with magnetite), which is altered to leucoxene.On the basis of mineralogy, the Whitemud Formation is definitely a correlative of the Colgate Member of the Fox Hills Formation in Montana and North Dakota.The upper Eastend and Whitemud Formations were derived from Upper Cretaceous volcanic rocks, Precambrian and Paleozoic metamorphic rocks, and Paleozoic carbonates all situated in Montana. Upper Eastend sediments represent fast mechanical weathering of mountains of freshly extruded volcanic rocks, whereas the Whitemud sediments represent slow chemical weathering and leaching, which predominated once the mountainous volcanic rocks were worn down. This deep chemical weathering altered the volcanic tuffs and flows into kaolinitic clay at the source area; the kaolin of the Whitemud Formation is not derived from the weathering of feldspars at the site of deposition.It is suggested that the Frenchman and Ravenscrag Formations were also derived from Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary volcanic rocks in Montana.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document