Mississippi Basin Carbon Project; upland soil database for sites in Yazoo Basin, northern Mississippi

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Harden ◽  
T.L. Fries ◽  
T.G. Huntington
Keyword(s):  
Upland Soil ◽  
Soil Database ◽  
Yazoo Basin ◽  
Carbon Project

scholarly journals Mississippi Basin Carbon Project: upland soil database for sites in Nishnabotna River basin, Iowa

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Harden ◽  
T.L. Fries ◽  
R. Haughy ◽  
L. Kramer ◽  
Shuhui Zheng
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Upland Soil ◽  
Soil Database ◽  
Carbon Project

The Effectiveness of Herbicides in Upland Soil Types in Kyushu

1972 ◽  
Vol 1972 (13) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Iwaho IWATA ◽  
Susumu SIRASAKA
Keyword(s):  
Soil Types ◽  
Upland Soil

scholarly journals An investigation of upland soil fertility from different soil types

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Quoc Thinh Tran ◽  
Kiwako S. Araki ◽  
Motoki Kubo
Keyword(s):  
Soil Fertility ◽  
Soil Types ◽  
Upland Soil

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Various Methods of Handling Missing Data in UNSODA

Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 727
Author(s):  
Yingpeng Fu ◽  
Hongjian Liao ◽  
Longlong Lv
Keyword(s):  
Missing Data ◽  
Missing Values ◽  
Soil Property ◽  
Particle Density ◽  
Organic Matter Content ◽  
Nonparametric Tests ◽  
Matter Content ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Soil Database ◽  
Property Data

UNSODA, a free international soil database, is very popular and has been used in many fields. However, missing soil property data have limited the utility of this dataset, especially for data-driven models. Here, three machine learning-based methods, i.e., random forest (RF) regression, support vector (SVR) regression, and artificial neural network (ANN) regression, and two statistics-based methods, i.e., mean and multiple imputation (MI), were used to impute the missing soil property data, including pH, saturated hydraulic conductivity (SHC), organic matter content (OMC), porosity (PO), and particle density (PD). The missing upper depths (DU) and lower depths (DL) for the sampling locations were also imputed. Before imputing the missing values in UNSODA, a missing value simulation was performed and evaluated quantitatively. Next, nonparametric tests and multiple linear regression were performed to qualitatively evaluate the reliability of these five imputation methods. Results showed that RMSEs and MAEs of all features fluctuated within acceptable ranges. RF imputation and MI presented the lowest RMSEs and MAEs; both methods are good at explaining the variability of data. The standard error, coefficient of variance, and standard deviation decreased significantly after imputation, and there were no significant differences before and after imputation. Together, DU, pH, SHC, OMC, PO, and PD explained 91.0%, 63.9%, 88.5%, 59.4%, and 90.2% of the variation in BD using RF, SVR, ANN, mean, and MI, respectively; and this value was 99.8% when missing values were discarded. This study suggests that the RF and MI methods may be better for imputing the missing data in UNSODA.

scholarly journals A Comparison, Validation, and Evaluation of the S-world Global Soil Property Database

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 544
Author(s):  
Jetse J. Stoorvogel ◽  
Vera L. Mulder
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Soil Properties ◽  
Soil Property ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Clay Content ◽  
Soil Database ◽  
Global Environmental ◽  
Global Soil ◽  
Mean Square Difference ◽  
Methodological Evaluation

Despite the increased usage of global soil property maps, a proper review of the maps rarely takes place. This study aims to explore the options for such a review with an application for the S-World global soil property database. Global soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay content maps from S-World were studied at two spatial resolutions in three steps. First, a comparative analysis with an ensemble of seven datasets derived from five other global soil databases was done. Second, a validation of S-World was done with independent soil observations from the WoSIS soil profile database. Third, a methodological evaluation of S-world took place by looking at the variation of soil properties per soil type and short distance variability. In the comparative analysis, S-World and the ensemble of other maps show similar spatial patterns. However, the ensemble locally shows large discrepancies (e.g., in boreal regions where typically SOC contents are high and the sampling density is low). Overall, the results show that S-World is not deviating strongly from the model ensemble (91% of the area falls within a 1.5% SOC range in the topsoil). The validation with the WoSIS database showed that S-World was able to capture a large part of the variation (with, e.g., a root mean square difference of 1.7% for SOC in the topsoil and a mean difference of 1.2%). Finally, the methodological evaluation revealed that estimates of the ranges of soil properties for the different soil types can be improved by using the larger WoSIS database. It is concluded that the review through the comparison, validation, and evaluation provides a good overview of the strengths and the weaknesses of S-World. The three approaches to review the database each provide specific insights regarding the quality of the database. Specific evaluation criteria for an application will determine whether S-World is a suitable soil database for use in global environmental studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document