scholarly journals Design and methods of the California stream quality assessment (CSQA), 2017

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason T. May ◽  
Lisa H. Nowell ◽  
James F. Coles ◽  
Daniel T. Button ◽  
Amanda H. Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Stream Quality ◽  
Design And Methods

scholarly journals Design and methods of the Midwest Stream Quality Assessment (MSQA), 2013

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica D. Garrett ◽  
Jeffrey W. Frey ◽  
Peter C. Van Metre ◽  
Celeste A. Journey ◽  
Naomi Nakagaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Stream Quality ◽  
Design And Methods

scholarly journals Design and methods of the Southeast Stream Quality Assessment (SESQA), 2014

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celeste A. Journey ◽  
Peter C. Van Metre ◽  
Amanda H. Bell ◽  
Jessica D. Garrett ◽  
Daniel T. Button ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Stream Quality ◽  
Design And Methods

scholarly journals Design and methods of the Pacific Northwest Stream Quality Assessment (PNSQA), 2015

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rich W. Sheibley ◽  
Jennifer L. Morace ◽  
Celeste A. Journey ◽  
Peter C. Van Metre ◽  
Amanda H. Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Stream Quality ◽  
Design And Methods

scholarly journals Design and methods of the U.S. Geological Survey Northeast Stream Quality Assessment (NESQA), 2016

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Coles ◽  
Karen Riva-Murray ◽  
Peter C. Van Metre ◽  
Daniel T. Button ◽  
Amanda H. Bell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Geological Survey ◽  
Stream Quality ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
The U.S

THE NORTHEAST STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Riva Murray ◽  
◽  
James F. Coles ◽  
Peter C. Van Metre
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Stream Quality

scholarly journals Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deying Kang ◽  
Yuxia Wu ◽  
Dan Hu ◽  
Qi Hong ◽  
Jialiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
External Validity ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Interrater Agreement ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Design And Methods

Objective. The aim of this study is to measure the reliability and external validity of AMSTAR by applying it to a sample of TCM systematic reviews.Study Design and Methods. We tested the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of AMSTAR through comparisons with OQAQ. Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS 13.0.Results. A random of sample with 41 TCM systematic reviews was selected from a database. The interrater agreement of the individual items of AMSTAR was moderate with a mean kappa of 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.73). The ICC for AMSTAR against OQAQ (total score of 9 items, excluding item 10) was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.93).Conclusions. Although there is room for improvement on few items, the new tool is reliable, valid, and easy to use for methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews on TCM.

The Pacific northwest stream quality assessment

Fact Sheet ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Van Metre ◽  
Jennifer L. Morace ◽  
Rich W. Sheibley
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Stream Quality

scholarly journals The California stream quality assessment

Fact Sheet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Van Metre ◽  
Amanda L. Egler ◽  
Jason T. May
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Stream Quality
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document