Preliminary isopach maps of the Cambrian Lamotte Sandstone and Cambrian Bonneterre Formation, Rolla 1 degree by 2 degrees Quadrangle, Missouri

1979 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 463 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.L. Schneider ◽  
K.C. Hill ◽  
N. Hoffman

Shipwreck Trough, east-central Otway Basin, evolved through Early Cretaceous to Santonian extension, followed by Campanian–Paleocene and Miocene to Recent pulses of compression.Onshore to offshore correlation of seismic sequences combined with 3D seismic mapping reveals that the Minerva anticline is located above an Early Cretaceous, northeast trending, basement-involved, graben. The graben-forming, northeast and north–south trending faults became largely inactive prior to the end of the Early Cretaceous. During the Turonian to Santonian, the northeast trending Point Ronald anticline and newly formed east–west trending normal faults controlled sediment distribution. The structural style changed in the Campanian as the northeast trending Minerva anticline began to form with a coeval, northwest-trending, axial-perpendicular fault array located along the crest of the fold. The location and orientation of this fault set is consistent with a compressional mechanism for fold growth. Similar compressional folding events during the Miocene–Recent modified and tightened the fold. Isopach maps show that during the Campanian to Maastrichtian, sediment thinned onto the nascent Minerva anticline, but accommodation rate outpaced structural growth, preserving a continuous sedimentary sequence.The timing of compressional fold growth is enigmatic. Campanian–Maastrichtian compression at the Minerva anticline was synchronous with over 10 km of extension accommodated by the Tartwaup–Mussel hingeline, 50 km to the south. Although the compression may be far-field effects associated with Tasman Basin sea floor spreading, we speculate that the Minerva anticline grew by transpression within a larger left-lateral transtensional Shipwreck Trough.


1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 339 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Fairburn

Sandstone reservoirs within the Lower Permian Epsilon Formation, despite being gas productive in several fields in the Cooper Basin of South Australia, in particular Big Lake and Moomba, have proved to be elusive targets for exploration. This is mainly due to the distribution pattern of these sands, which differs markedly from that of the thicker and laterally extensive fluvial sands which are prevalent in the Toolachee and Patchawarra formations. As a consequence, there has been some acceptance that the distribution of Epsilon Formation reservoirs are unpredictable.Log correlation studies of the Epsilon Formation, in conjunction with sand trend mapping, have identified sands which are either laterally continuous ('sheet' sands) or laterally discontinuous ('ribbon' sands).Core facies analysis supports the interpretation that the 'sheet' sands are lake shore strandline deposits whereas the 'ribbon' sands are distributary channel deposits of prograding delta systems.Based on the inferred depositional models, and with the aid of detailed isopach maps, it has been possible to project reservoir trends of the channel sands and prepare sand maps, at varying gamma-ray cutoffs, of the shoreface sands.An understanding of the geometry of the various sand bodies has clarified the prospectivity of the Epsilon Formation and facilitated the selection of development well locations throughout the Southern Cooper Bas


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document