scholarly journals Redefinition of SI Units Based on Fundamental Physical Constants

2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 668-674
Author(s):  
Kenichi FUJII
Keyword(s):  
Fundamental Physical Constants ◽  
Physical Constants ◽  
Si Units ◽  
Redefinition Of Si Units ◽  
Fundamental Physical

Fine tuning the SI units and fundamental physical constants

1991 ◽  
Vol 433 (1887) ◽  
pp. 219-233 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Recent Work ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Fundamental Physical Constants ◽  
Physical Constants ◽  
Si Units ◽  
Temperature Potential ◽  
Fundamental Physical

The paper discusses the recent changes in the values assigned to the national representations of the SI units of time, temperature, potential and resistance, together with the implications of recent work on the fundamental physical constants.

Values of the fundamental physical constants according to agreements in 1969

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1124-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. V. Gorbatsevich ◽  
V. M. Holin ◽  
V. N. Nosal'
Keyword(s):  
Fundamental Physical Constants ◽  
Physical Constants ◽  
Fundamental Physical

scholarly journals On the Fundamental Physical Constants: I. Phenomenology

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Ogaba Philip Obande
Keyword(s):  
Free Space ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Spatial Dimension ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Alternative Methods ◽  
Atomic Unit ◽  
Gravitational Acceleration ◽  
Fundamental Physical Constants ◽  
Physical Constants ◽  
Fundamental Physical

The fundamental physical constants (FCs) are parametrized. The results reveal that: 1) FCs are field coupling constants. With the exception of ratio of identities such as μ = mp/me, there are no dimensionless constants – all FCs, including Alpha and pi, are dimensional. 2) The constant k = 1.6022 x 10-19 implicates: i) atomic unit of torque, it causes matter’s intrinsic rotation on all (atomic to cosmic) scales; ii) motion of unrestricted bodies through free space and random thermal (Brownian) motion in condensed matter; iii) superluminal space expansion, i.e., Hubble effect is not an acceleration but tangential velocity (pi c) of free space; and iv) common parametric definition of radioactivity and stellar explosion/supernova. 3) Newtonian gravitation comprises two potentials, a spherical pneumatic torque field G1 acts to inflate the gravitational envelope and a combination of force fields G2 impacts an acute hydrostatic pressure on the individual and common envelopes of the gravitating bodies; the two contrary force fields function to create a coherent rigid system in dynamic equilibrium. 4) The bosonic unit mass gravitational acceleration constant, gw = 7.9433 x 1059 m s-2 kg-1 is associated with the strong nuclear force (SNF), it binds matter on all (atomic to cosmic) scales. 5) Although the classical electron radius (CER) formulation re = e2/mec2 yields correct value, it is nonetheless fortuitous as me deviates from the theoretical value by twenty orders of magnitude and theory does not link spatial dimension to electrostatics charge quantum. 6) Successful evaluation of re by three alternative methods implies that an attempt to relegate the CER as currently obtains in the Standard Model seeks to re-engineer reality. 7) Electron bosonic radius identifies with the astronomical unit, it accounts for “spooky” action at a distance and “entanglement” effects. 8) Planck length fails to relate to atomic spatial dimension indicating that Planck space does not refer to the atom. 9) Electric, magnetic and gravitational effects are all motivated by torque but its magnitude differs according to the order: electrical (N m) > magnetic (N m)0.75 > gravitational (N m)0.25. It is submitted that even if the atom degraded with cosmological epoch, values of the FCs would remain fixed because they are parametric relative quantities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document