scholarly journals Evaluating Method of Deformation at Losing Point of Axial Load Carrying Capacity of RC Columns

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 501-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kato ◽  
Yudai Miyajima ◽  
Yukiko Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Carrying Capacity ◽  
Rc Columns ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Evaluating Method

scholarly journals Prediction of Residual Axial Load Carrying Capacity of Reinforced Concrete (RC) Columns Subjected to Extreme Dynamic Loads

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Abedini ◽  
Azrul A. Mutalib ◽  
Sudharshan N. Raman ◽  
Shahrizan Baharom ◽  
J. Sima Nouri
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Dynamic Loads ◽  
Load Carrying Capacity ◽  
Rc Columns ◽  
Load Carrying

scholarly journals Experimental Study on the Residual Axial Load-Carrying Capacity of Shear-Damaged RC Columns

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Yang ◽  
Kazuto Matsukawa ◽  
Ho Choi ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakano
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Load Carrying Capacity ◽  
Rc Columns ◽  
Load Carrying

The effect of different retrofitting techniques on the axial load carrying capacity of damaged cylindrical shells

Structures ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 590-601
Author(s):  
Hamed Rahman Shokrgozar ◽  
Vahid Akrami ◽  
Tayebeh Jafari Ma'af ◽  
Naseraldin Shahbazi
Keyword(s):  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Cylindrical Shells ◽  
Load Carrying Capacity ◽  
Load Carrying

Analysis of Seismic Performance of RC Frames with Centrally Reinforced Columns

2013 ◽  
Vol 671-674 ◽  
pp. 1319-1323
Author(s):  
Zi Xue Lei ◽  
Yu Hang Han ◽  
San Sheng Dong ◽  
Jun Qing Guo
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Seismic Load ◽  
Load Carrying Capacity ◽  
Rc Columns ◽  
Rc Column ◽  
Rc Frames ◽  
Load Carrying

A centrally reinforced column is a new type of RC columns, formed by providing a reinforcement skeleton at the central part of the cross section of an ordinary RC column. Tests have shown that as compared with an ordinary RC column, this type of columns has a higher load carrying capacity and ductility. From the pushover analysis of a frame composed of ordinary RC columns and one consisting of centrally reinforced columns, their seismic performance under seismic load of 9-degree intensity was studied according to Chinese code, including target displacements, story-level displacements, interstory drifts, appearance and development of plastic hinges. The results indicate that although the dimensions of cross sections of columns in the frame with centrally reinforced columns are smaller than those of the ordinary frame, the former still has a higher overall load carrying capacity and seismic performance than the latter.

Experimental study on the axial compression performance of GFRP-reinforced concrete square columns

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1554-1565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianwei Tu ◽  
Kui Gao ◽  
Lang He ◽  
Xinping Li
Keyword(s):  
Carrying Capacity ◽  
Ultimate Load ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Load Carrying Capacity ◽  
Longitudinal Reinforcement ◽  
Rc Columns ◽  
Compression Performance ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Load Carrying ◽  
Ultimate Load Carrying Capacity

At present, extensive studies have been conducted relative to the topic of fiber-reinforced polymer(FRP)- reinforced concrete (RC) flexural members, and many design methods have also been introduced. There have, however, been few studies conducted on the topic of FRP-RC compression members. In light of this, eight glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP)-RC square columns (200×200×600 mm) were tested in order to investigate their axial compression performance. These columns were reinforced with GFRP longitudinal reinforcement and confined GFRP stirrup. These experiments investigated the effects of the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, stirrup configuration (spirals versus hoops) and spacing on the load-carrying capacity and failure modes of GFRP-RC rectangular columns. The test results indicate that the load-carrying capacity of longitudinal GFRP bars accounted for 3%-7% of the ultimate load-carrying capacity of the columns. The ultimate load-carrying capacity of RC columns confined with GFRP spirals increased by 0.8%-1.6% with higher ductility, compared to GFRP hoops. Reducing the stirrup spacing may prevent the buckling failure of the longitudinal bars and increase the ductility and load-carrying capacity of the GFRP-RC columns. It has been found that setting the GFRP compressive strength to 35% of the GFRP maximum tensile strength yields a reasonable estimate of ultimate load-carrying capacity of GFRP-RC columns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document