scholarly journals A Community-Based “Street Team” Tobacco Cessation Intervention by and for Youth and Young Adults

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Saw ◽  
Crystal Nicole Steltenpohl

Most tobacco users initiate use as youth or young adults. To promote tobacco cessation for this group and encourage non-users’ engagement in tobacco control efforts, a community-based organization developed a “Street Team” brief outreach intervention that enlisted youth and young adults to encourage their peers to stop tobacco use through a brief intervention. Street Team members provided education, a Quit Kit, and referrals to cessation resources at a total of 27 community events over a four-year period. Tobacco users (n = 279) completed assessments of tobacco use, quit intention, and quit self-efficacy at baseline. Self-reports of cessation outcomes including past week abstinence were assessed 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-intervention. Perceptions of the intervention were gathered from Street Team members (n = 28) and intervention participants post-intervention. T-tests and χ2-tests were used to compare those who completed at least one follow-up assessment to those lost to follow-up. Time effects were analyzed using fixed effect models. Missing = using analyses indicate 16.1, 18.6, and 12.5% 7-day quit rate at 1-, 3-, and 6-months follow-up. Feedback from intervention participants indicate the intervention was acceptable and that discussions with Street Team members and provision of quit kits motivated tobacco users to consider quitting. All Street Team members responded positively to their participation in the intervention. This Street Team approach for youth and young adults is promising as an effective approach to the promotion of tobacco cessation among users and engagement and empowerment in tobacco control efforts among non-users.

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Saw ◽  
Crystal N. Steltenpohl ◽  
Kimberly Bankston-Lee ◽  
Elisa K. Tong

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizeus Rutebemberwa ◽  
Kellen Nyamurungi ◽  
Surabhi Joshi ◽  
Yvonne Olando ◽  
Hadii M. Mamudu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tobacco use is associated with exacerbation of tuberculosis (TB) and poor TB treatment outcomes. Integrating tobacco use cessation within TB treatment could improve healing among TB patients. The aim was to explore perceptions of health workers on where and how to integrate tobacco use cessation services into TB treatment programs in Uganda. Methods Between March and April 2019, nine focus group discussions (FGDs) and eight key informant interviews were conducted among health workers attending to patients with tuberculosis on a routine basis in nine facilities from the central, eastern, northern and western parts of Uganda. These facilities were high volume health centres, general hospitals and referral hospitals. The FGD sessions and interviews were tape recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis and the Chronic Care Model as a framework. Results Respondents highlighted that just like TB prevention starts in the community and TB treatment goes beyond health facility stay, integration of tobacco cessation should be started when people are still healthy and extended to those who have been healed as they go back to communities. There was need to coordinate with different organizations like peers, the media and TB treatment supporters. TB patients needed regular follow up and self-management support for both TB and tobacco cessation. Patients needed to be empowered to know their condition and their caretakers needed to be involved. Effective referral between primary health facilities and specialist facilities was needed. Clinical information systems should identify relevant people for proactive care and follow up. In order to achieve effective integration, the health system needed to be strengthened especially health worker training and provision of more space in some of the facilities. Conclusions Tobacco cessation activities should be provided in a continuum starting in the community before the TB patients get to hospital, during the patients’ interface with hospital treatment and be given in the community after TB patients have been discharged. This requires collaboration between those who carry out health education in communities, the TB treatment supporters and the health workers who treat patients in health facilities.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Ward

Treating tobacco dependence is paramount for global tobacco control efforts, but is often overshadowed by other policy priorities. As stated by Jha (2009), “cessation by current smokers is the only practical way to avoid a substantial proportion of tobacco deaths worldwide before 2050.” Its importance is codified in Article 14 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), and in the WHO's MPOWER package of effective country-level policies. Unfortunately, only 15% of the world's population have access to appropriate cessation support (WHO, 2015). Moreover, parties to the FCTC have implemented only 51% of the indicators within Article 14, on average, which is far lower than many other articles (WHO, 2014). Further, commenting on the use of “O” measures (Offer help to quit tobacco use) in the MPOWER acronym, WHO recently concluded, “while there has been improvement in implementing comprehensive tobacco cessation services, this is nonetheless a most under-implemented MPOWER measure in terms of the number of countries that have fully implemented it” (WHO, 2015). To the detriment of global tobacco control efforts, only one in eight countries provides comprehensive cost-covered services, only one in four provide some cost coverage for nicotine replacement therapy, and fewer than one third provide a toll-free quit line (WHO, 2015).


Author(s):  
Donna Vallone ◽  
Marisa Greenberg ◽  
Haijun Xiao ◽  
Morgane Bennett ◽  
Jennifer Cantrell ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Richard Isralowitz ◽  
Alexander Reznik ◽  
Itay Pruginin ◽  
Maria Bolshakova

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-204
Author(s):  
Pallav Pokhrel ◽  
Thaddeus A. Herzog ◽  
Crissy T. Kawamoto ◽  
Pebbles Fagan

Objectives: In this study, we tested the use of ecigarette, cigarette, and dual use of both as predictors of heat-not-burn (HNB) tobacco product use onset among young adults, and examined common predictors of smoking cessation as predictors of HNB product use. Methods: We collected data from 2229 young adults [mean age = 21.1 (SD = 2.1); 55% women] in Hawaii, at 2 time-points 6 months apart. Results: Current cigarette-only use was the strongest concurrent predictor of HNB product use, followed by dual use, and ecigarette-only use. Among HNB product never users at Wave 1, dual and ecigarette-only use at Wave 1 significantly predicted HNB product use onset at Wave 2. Among cigarette smokers who had never used an HNB product at Wave 1, current use of ecigarette for help with smoking cessation predicted increased odds of HNB product use at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: Although promoted as a safer alternative for exclusive cigarette smokers, HNB products may increase the risk of dual or poly-tobacco product use among young adults, including current exclusive e-cigarette users. Surveillance of HNB product use as a modified risk tobacco product may need to consider the effects of HNB products on poly-tobacco use among young people.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S511-S511
Author(s):  
Nasreen Khatri ◽  
Stephen Perkovic ◽  
Tara Faghani Hamadani

Abstract Living Life to the Full 55+ (LLTTF) was an 8-week, 12-hour, community educational program based on CBT principles. The program aim was to teach participant skills and techniques to cope effectively with life stress. Participants self-referred to the program by responding to advertisements or were otherwise referred to the program by local community centres. Following the promising results of the pilot study, a follow-up empirical study was conducted to assess the impact of the program on clinical measures and other notable measures over time. Study participants (N = 514) were recruited at partner sites hosting the program. Demographic and other data was collected to assess the impact of the program. Measures collected to assess the impact of the program were the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), and a brief measure of loneliness/social connectedness. Participant data was collected pre/post-intervention, and at post-course follow-up periods (3/6/9-months). Preliminary repeated-measures ANOVA analyses found statistically significant changes in depression, anxiety, mental well-being, and loneliness scores, from pre- to post-intervention. Participant’ depression, anxiety, and loneliness scores significantly reduced from pre- to post-course. Participants also experienced a significant improvement in mental well-being from pre- to post-course. Observed decreases in loneliness and depression did not significantly change from post-course to any of the follow-up periods. Results suggest the viability of a nonclinical program for addressing depression and loneliness in older individuals, and have implications for community-based strategies attempting to address mental health issues in older Canadians


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1603-1603
Author(s):  
Katharine Ann Dobson Amato ◽  
Michael Zevon ◽  
Pat Hysert ◽  
Robert Hysert ◽  
Stephanie Segal ◽  
...  

1603 Background: Tobacco use by cancer patients is associated with poor therapeutic outcomes including increased toxicity, decreased quality of life, and decreased survival. Though recommendations provide for tobacco assessment and cessation for cancer patients, few oncologists provide cessation support. Presented are data from universal tobacco assessment and cessation program for patients presenting at a thoracic oncology clinic in a NCI Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods: A standard set of evidence based tobacco assessment questions were incorporated into an automated electronic medical record based system delivered by nursing at initial consult and at follow-up. Patients eligible for tobacco cessation support (i.e. patients self-reporting tobacco use within 30 days) were automatically referred to a dedicated tobacco cessation service. All referred patients are sent a standardized packet of cessation materials with telephone-based follow-up by trained cessation counselors. Results: A total of 980 new thoracic clinic patients were referred to the cessation service from January 2011 and October 2012. Two-thirds of the patients referred (n=728) referred into the system were current smokers and the remainder had quit in the 30 days prior to assessment. Among the 788 patients with contact attempts by the cessation service, 81.2% (n=640) were successfully contacted and only 2.5% (n=20) refused the offer of cessation support. At first contact, 75.6% (n=484) of patients reported continued current tobacco use. Follow-up calls were placed for 53.1% (n=340) of those who participated in the first contact an average of 39 days after the first successful contact. The follow-up had a 93.2% (n=317) participation rate which revealed that 33.3% (n=106) reported not smoking, an 8.9% increase since the first cessation service telephone call. Conclusions: Data demonstrate that an automated tobacco assessment and cessation service for thoracic oncology patients can effectively generate a large mandatory referral base with high patient interest in cessation, and that cessation support can be implemented and maintained in high risk cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Emily Johengen ◽  
Arielle Davidson ◽  
Kathleen W. Beekman ◽  
Kelly Hecht ◽  
Emily R. Mackler

235 Background: Use of oral anticancer agents (OAAs) for cancer treatment continues to grow and creates a need for oncology practices to adapt their ambulatory infusion model of care to one that supports patients taking anti-cancer treatment at home. Historically, our practice has had success with care managers supporting infusion treatment patients. A recently published randomized trial has shown considerable benefits of dedicated pharmacist follow-up for patients taking OAAs. As a result, our practice added a dedicated oncology pharmacist to provide education and follow-up for our OAA patients. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective evaluation of time to first follow up for patients taking OAAs pre-intervention (11/1/20 - 2/28/21) versus post-intervention (3/1/21 - 4/30/21). The intervention consists of structured symptom and adherence monitoring by a dedicated oncology pharmacist as part of our care management team for all patients prescribed an OAA. In the pre-intervention group, OAA monitoring was divided between care team members without a dedicated OAA program. The population consists of 139 patients newly started on OAAs over the 6-month period. “On-time” follow up defined by our practice is follow up that is <10 days from the OAA start date. There were 20 patients (10 per group) excluded from data analysis due to being deceased before follow-up could be assessed (n= 3), transferring oncology care elsewhere (n= 5), or never starting the OAA (n= 12). Results: Pre-intervention, initial follow up occurred via pharmacist or nurse care manager visit (n=47), provider visit (n=29), or unplanned admission (n=3). Post-intervention, all but two initial follow up visits were performed by the designated oncology pharmacist, and there were no unplanned admissions prior to first follow up. The median time to first follow up visit was 8 days (range 2 to 31 days) in the pre-intervention group (n=79) and 7 days (range 3 to 15 days) in the post-intervention group (n=40). Follow up visits occurred within 10 days of OAA initiation for 67.1% of patients in the pre-intervention group and 95% of patients in the post-intervention group (p=<0.001). Follow up occurred within 14 days of initiation for 82.3% of pre-intervention patients and 97.5% of post-intervention patients (p=0.018). Conclusions: Post-intervention assessment showed improvement in the time to follow up for patients taking OAAs. Future analyses will include outcomes, such as interventions at the time of follow-up, length on therapy, and unplanned admissions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cantrell ◽  
Elizabeth C Hair ◽  
Alexandria Smith ◽  
Morgane Bennett ◽  
Jessica Miller Rath ◽  
...  

IntroductionEvaluation studies of population-based tobacco control interventions often rely on large-scale survey data from numerous respondents across many geographic areas to provide evidence of their effectiveness. Significant challenges for survey research have emerged with the evolving communications landscape, particularly for surveying hard-to-reach populations such as youth and young adults. This study combines the comprehensive coverage of an address-based sampling (ABS) frame with the timeliness of online data collection to develop a nationally representative longitudinal cohort of young people aged 15-21.MethodsWe constructed an ABS frame, partially supplemented with auxiliary data, to recruit this hard-to-reach sample. Branded and tested mail-based recruitment materials were designed to bring respondents online for screening, consent and surveying. Once enrolled, respondents completed online surveys every 6 months via computer, tablet or smartphone. Numerous strategies were utilized to enhance retention and representativenessResultsResults detail sample performance, representativeness and retention rates as well as device utilization trends for survey completion among youth and young adult respondents. Panel development efforts resulted in a large, nationally representative sample with high retention rates.ConclusionsThis study is among the first to employ this hybrid ABS-to-online methodology to recruit and retain youth and young adults in a probability-based online cohort panel. The approach is particularly valuable for conducting research among younger populations as it capitalizes on their increasing access to and comfort with digital communication. We discuss challenges and opportunities of panel recruitment and retention methods in an effort to provide valuable information for tobacco control researchers seeking to obtain representative, population-based samples of youth and young adults in the U.S. as well as across the globe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document