scholarly journals ML5: Replications of Payne, Burkley, & Stokes (2008)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Ebersole ◽  
Michelangelo Vianello ◽  
Juliette Richetin ◽  
Luca Andrighetto ◽  
Jon E. Grahe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Original Study ◽  
Current Investigation ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
Moderating Role ◽  
Rule Out

To rule out an alternative explanation to their structural fit hypothesis, Payne, Burkley, and Stokes (2008) demonstrated that correlations between implicit and explicit race attitudes were weaker when participants were put under high pressure to respond without bias compared to when they were placed under low pressure. This effect, although smaller in size, was replicated in Italy by Vianello (2015). The current investigation sought to examine the possible moderating role of sample source for this effect. Teams from eight universities, four in the United States and four in Italy, replicated the original study (N = 1,103). Although we did detect moderation by sample source, it was due to a reversal of the original effect in the United States and a lack of the original effect in the Italian samples. We discuss this curious finding and possible explanations.

scholarly journals Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Payne, Burkley, and Stokes (2008), Study 4

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Ebersole ◽  
Luca Andrighetto ◽  
Erica Casini ◽  
Carlo Chiorri ◽  
Anna Dalla Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
High Pressure ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Original Study ◽  
Current Investigation ◽  
Implicit And Explicit ◽  
Rule Out

To rule out an alternative to their structural-fit hypothesis, Payne, Burkley, and Stokes (2008) demonstrated that correlations between implicit and explicit race attitudes were weaker when participants were put under high pressure to respond without bias than when they were placed under low pressure. This effect was replicated in Italy by Vianello (2015), although the replication effect was smaller than the original effect. In the current investigation, we examined the possibility that the source of a study’s sample moderates this effect. Teams from eight universities, four in the United States and four in Italy, replicated the original study (replication N = 1,103). Although we did detect moderation by the sample’s country, it was due to a reversal of the original effect in the United States and a lack of the original effect in Italy. We discuss this curious finding and possible explanations.

The Arts as a Polarized Issue and the Role of Political Trust in Promoting the Arts: Evidence From the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-97
Author(s):  
Lim Jae Young ◽  
Woo Harin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
General Social Survey ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Political Trust ◽  
The United States ◽  
Social Survey ◽  
The Arts ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Moderating Role

The arts in the United States, for a long time received strong support from both sides of the political aisle. However, in recent years, the arts have been transformed into a partisan issue that pits conservatives against liberals. The article points to the importance of political trust as a means of helping conservatives overcome their ideological inclinations and support the arts. Scholars argue that political trust influences more strongly individuals who perceive a given policy to be one that imposes ideological risks for them compared with those without such risks. Focusing on the moderating role of political trust, the article examines whether political trust can help alleviate the conservatives’ hostility to the arts. Relying on the 2016 General Social Survey, the article finds that conservatives have no direct relationship with arts spending, but they will be more likely to support arts spending when this is contingent upon political trust.

Diversity Beliefs as Moderator of the Contact–Prejudice Relationship

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adekemi A. Adesokan ◽  
Johannes Ullrich ◽  
Rolf van Dick ◽  
Linda R. Tropp
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Ethnic Diversity ◽  
Intergroup Contact ◽  
The United States ◽  
Moderator Effects ◽  
Perceived Importance ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Moderating Role

Research on intergroup contact has recently begun to examine how individual differences moderate the reduction of prejudice. We extend this work by examining the moderating role of diversity beliefs, i.e., the strength of individuals’ beliefs that society benefits from ethnic diversity. Results of a survey among 255 university students in the United States show that the relationship between contact and reduced prejudice is stronger for individuals holding less favorable diversity beliefs compared to those with more positive diversity beliefs. Likewise, the relationship between contact and perceived importance of contact is stronger for people with less favorable diversity beliefs. Together with previously reported moderator effects, these results suggest that contact especially benefits people who are the most predisposed to being prejudiced.

The Qualities of Teacher–Child Relationships and Self-Regulation of Children at Risk in the United States and Turkey: The Moderating Role of Gender

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim H. Acar ◽  
Mefharet Veziroglu-Celik ◽  
Aileen Garcia ◽  
Amy Colgrove ◽  
Helen Raikes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Children At Risk ◽  
Moderating Role

scholarly journals Pain severity and e-cigarette health literacy: the moderating role of sex

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117822181989707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Smit ◽  
Hannah Olofsson ◽  
Pamella Nizio ◽  
Lorra Garey ◽  
Michael J Zvolensky
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pain Severity ◽  
Cigarette Use ◽  
Cigarette Dependence ◽  
Moderating Role

Although electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has increased among adults in the United States, there is still little knowledge of factors that may influence e-cigarette use or beliefs about use. Prior research suggests that health literacy plays an important role in e-cigarette beliefs, including perceived benefits and risks of e-cigarette use, as well as e-cigarette dependence. Yet, limited work has examined risk factors of poor e-cigarette health literacy. From a biopsychological perspective, sex and pain severity represent two constructs that may impact e-cigarette health literacy. To date, however, no research has investigated differences in e-cigarette health literacy across pain, sex, or their interrelation. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the interactive effect of pain severity and sex on e-cigarette health literacy. Participants included 319 current, adult e-cigarette users (60.5% female, Mage = 36.82 years, SD = 10.62). Findings supported a significant pain by sex interaction, such that pain related to e-cigarette health literacy among women ( b = .10, SE = .03, P < .001), but not men ( b = .01, SE = .03, P = .60). The present findings suggest that pain may uniquely impact the degree to which women, but not men, seek and understand information on e-cigarettes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document