scholarly journals Aggregating Distributional Treatment Effects: A Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of the Microcredit Literature

Author(s):  
Rachael Meager

This paper develops methods to aggregate evidence on distributional treatment effects from multiple studies conducted in different settings, and applies them to the microcredit literature. Several randomized trials of expanding access to microcredit found substantial effects on the tails of household outcome distributions, but the extent to which these findings generalize to future settings was not known. Aggregating the evidence on sets of quantile effects poses additional challenges relative to average effects because distributional effects must imply monotonic quantiles and pass information across quantiles. Using a Bayesian hierarchical framework, I develop new models to aggregate distributional effects and assess their generalizability. For continuous outcome variables, the methodological challenges are addressed by applying transforms to the unknown parameters. For partially discrete variables such as business profits, I use contextual economic knowledge to build tailored parametric aggregation models. I find generalizable evidence that microcredit has negligible impact on the distribution of various household outcomes below the 75th percentile, but above this point there is no generalizable prediction.

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melkamu Dedefo ◽  
Henry Mwambi ◽  
Sileshi Fanta ◽  
Nega Assefa

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally and the number one cause of death globally. Over 75% of CVD deaths take place in low- and middle-income countries. Hence, comprehensive information about the spatio-temporal distribution of mortality due to cardio vascular disease is of interest. We fitted different spatio-temporal models within Bayesian hierarchical framework allowing different space-time interaction for mortality mapping with integrated nested Laplace approximations to analyze mortality data extracted from the health and demographic surveillance system in Kersa District in Hararege, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. The result indicates that non-parametric time trends models perform better than linear models. Among proposed models, one with non-parametric trend, type II interaction and second order random walk but without unstructured time effect was found to perform best according to our experience and. simulation study. An application based on real data revealed that, mortality due to CVD increased during the study period, while administrative regions in northern and south-eastern part of the study area showed a significantly elevated risk. The study highlighted distinct spatiotemporal clusters of mortality due to CVD within the study area. The study is a preliminary assessment step in prioritizing areas for further and more comprehensive research raising questions to be addressed by detailed investigation. Underlying contributing factors need to be identified and accurately quantified.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Viswanathan ◽  
Tobias KD Weber ◽  
Andreas Scheidegger ◽  
Thilo Streck

<p>Crop models are used to evaluate the impact of climate change on food security by simulating plant phenology, yield, biomass and leaf area index. Plant phenology defines the timing of crucial growth stages and physiological processes that influence organ appearance and assimilate partitioning. It is governed by environmental factors such as solar radiation, temperature and water availability. Plant phenology is not only specific for the crop species, but also depends on the cultivar. Additionally, growth of a cultivar could vary depending on the environment. Common crop models cannot fully capture the influence of the environment on phenology, resulting in cultivar-specific parameters that are environment-dependent. These parameter estimates may be unreliable in case of limited data. Moreover, crucial species-specific information is ignored. On the other hand, in large regional-scale models covering multiple cultivars and environments, information about the cultivars grown is generally not available. In this case, a shared set of parameters for the crop species would suppress within-species differences leading to unreliable predictions.</p><p>A Bayesian hierarchical framework enables us to alleviate these problems by honouring the multi-level data structure. Additionally, we can reflect the uncertainty from different sources, for example, model inputs and measurements. In this study we implement a Bayesian hierarchical framework to estimate parameters of the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere System Simulation (SPASS) model for simulating phenological development of different cultivars of silage maize grown over all the contrasting climatological regions of Germany.</p><p>We used data from the German weather service on the phenological development stages of silage maize grown across Germany between 2009 and 2019. During this period, silage maize was grown in over 3000 unique location-year combinations. Maize crops were differentiated into early, mid-early, mid-late and late ripening groups and were further classified into cultivars within each ripening group. Within the hierarchical framework, we estimate maize species-specific parameters as well as parameters per ripening group and cultivar, through Bayesian model calibration. We analyse the influence of environmental conditions on parameter estimates, to further develop the hierarchical structure. We perform cross-validation to assess the prediction quality of the parameterized model.</p><p>With this approach, we show that robust parameter estimates account for differences between cultivars, ripening groups as well as different environmental conditions. The parameterized model can be used for large-scale phenology predictions of silage maize grown across Germany. These parameter estimates may perform better than independent species- or cultivar-specific estimates, in predicting phenology of future cultivars where specific cultivar characteristics are not known.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael Meager

Despite evidence from multiple randomized evaluations of microcredit, questions about external validity have impeded consensus on the results. I jointly estimate the average effect and the heterogeneity in effects across seven studies using Bayesian hierarchical models. I  find the impact on household business and consumption variables is unlikely to be transformative and may be negligible. I find reasonable external validity: true heterogeneity in effects is moderate, and approximately 60 percent of observed heterogeneity is sampling variation. Households with previous business experience have larger but more heterogeneous effects. Economic features of microcredit interventions predict variation in effects better than studies’ evaluation protocols. (JEL D14, G21, I38, O12, O16, P34, P36)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document