Surgical Management of Charcot Neuroarthropathy of the Foot and Ankle: A Systematic Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Lowery ◽  
Jason B. Woods ◽  
David G. Armstrong ◽  
Dane K. Wukich
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Charcot Neuroarthropathy

scholarly journals Management of Ankle Charcot Neuroarthropathy: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5923
Author(s):  
Ahmed ElSayed Galhoum ◽  
Vineet Trivedi ◽  
Mohamed Askar ◽  
Sergio Tejero ◽  
Mario Herrera-Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Articular Fracture ◽  
Charcot Neuroarthropathy ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Repetitive Trauma

Background: Charcot neuroarthropathy is a non-infective, destructive process occurring in patients rendered insensate by peripheral neuropathy, which is caused mainly by diabetes. Repetitive trauma from standing and walking provides a neuro-traumatic stimulus that leads to dislocation, or peri-articular fracture, or both, within the ankle. This review concentrates on the management protocols regarding the ankle only. Methods: A Pubmed search for clinical trials performed to manage ankle Charcot neuroarthropathy and a systematic review of these articles were undertaken. Results: Twenty papers met the inclusion criteria: four of them describe non-surgical management, while the rest show different surgical management options of ankle Charcot neuroarthropathy. Conclusions: Surgical algorithms for the treatment of CN of the ankle are based almost entirely on level four. There is inconclusive evidence concerning the timing of treatment and the use of different fixation methods. Instability and ulceration are the main precursors for surgical interventions. Prospective series and randomized studies, albeit difficult to perform, are necessary to support and strengthen current practice.

Association between Osteoprotegerin and Charcot Neuroarthropathy: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Ochoa-Précoma ◽  
Blanca T. Pacheco-Soto ◽  
Leonardo M. Porchia ◽  
Enrique Torres-Rasgado ◽  
Ricardo Pérez-Fuentes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Systematic Review Comparing Open versus Endoscopic Surgery in Clival Chordomas and a 10-Year Single-Center Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindran Visagan ◽  
Asfand Baig Mirza ◽  
Mohamed Okasha ◽  
Timothy Martyn Boardman ◽  
Eleni Maratos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Optimal Management ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Open Versus ◽  
Slow Growing

Abstract Objectives Chordomas are rare, slow-growing, and osteo-destructive tumors of the primitive notochord. There is still contention in the literature as to the optimal management of chordoma. We conducted a systematic review of the surgical management of chordoma along with our 10-year institutional experience. Design A systematic search of the literature was performed in October 2020 by using MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles relating to the surgical management of clival chordomas. We also searched for all adult patients surgically treated for primary clival chordomas at our institute between 2009 and 2019. Participants Only articles describing chordomas arising from the clivus were included in the analysis. For our institution experience, only adult primary clival chordoma cases were included. Main Outcome Measures Patients were divided into endoscopic or open surgery. Rate of gross total resection (GTR), recurrence, and complications were measured. Results Our literature search yielded 24 articles to include in the study. Mean GTR rate among endoscopic cases was 51.9% versus 41.7% for open surgery. Among the eight cases in our institutional experience, we found similar GTR rates between endoscopic and open surgery. Conclusion Although there is clear evidence in the literature that endoscopic approaches provide better rates of GTR with fewer overall complications compared to open surgery. However, there are still situations where endoscopy is not viable, and thus, open surgery should still be considered if required.

Surgical Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia Induced by Brainstem Infarct: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachyl M. Shanker ◽  
Miri Kim ◽  
Chloe Verducci ◽  
Elhaum G. Rezaii ◽  
Kerry Steed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Review Of The Literature

scholarly journals Comparison of 3D scanning versus traditional methods of capturing foot and ankle morphology for the fabrication of orthoses: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhannad Farhan ◽  
Joyce Zhanzi Wang ◽  
Paula Bray ◽  
Joshua Burns ◽  
Tegan L. Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Plaster Cast ◽  
3D Scanning ◽  
Foot Orthoses ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Health Measurement ◽  
Traditional Methods ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Speed Accuracy

Abstract Background In the production of ankle-foot orthoses and in-shoe foot orthoses, lower leg morphology is traditionally captured using a plaster cast or foam impression box. Plaster-based processes are a time-consuming and labour-intensive fabrication method. 3D scanning is a promising alternative, however how these new technologies compare with traditional methods is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the speed, accuracy and reliability of 3D scanning with traditional methods of capturing foot and ankle morphology for fabricating orthoses. Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed and electronic databases were searched to March 2020 using keywords related to 3D scanning technologies and traditional foot and ankle morphology capture methods. Studies of any design from healthy or clinical populations of any age and gender were eligible for inclusion. Studies must have compared 3D scanning to another form of capturing morphology of the foot and/or ankle. Data relating to speed, accuracy and reliability as well as study design, 3D scanner specifications and comparative capture techniques were extracted by two authors (M.F. and Z.W.). Study quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) and Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Results Six articles met the inclusion criteria, whereby 3D scanning was compared to five traditional methods (plaster cast, foam impression box, ink footprint, digital footprint and clinical assessment). The quality of study outcomes was rated low to moderate (GRADE) and doubtful to adequate (COSMIN). Compared to traditional methods, 3D scanning appeared to be faster than casting (2 to 11 min vs 11 to 16 min). Inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.18–0.99) and intra-rater reliability (ICCs 0.25–0.99) were highly variable for both 3D scanning and traditional techniques, with higher agreement generally dependent on the foot parameter measured. Conclusions The quality and quantity of literature comparing the speed, accuracy and reliability of 3D scanning with traditional methods of capturing foot and ankle morphology is low. 3D scanning appears to be faster especially for experienced users, however accuracy and reliability between methods is variable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document