scholarly journals A Technique for Treatment of Lateral Crus Malposition and Alar Rim Retraction Simultaneously in Rhinoplasty: Caudal Extended Lateral Crural Strut Graft

2021 ◽  
pp. 223-227
Author(s):  
Can İlker DEMİR ◽  
Emrah Kağan YAŞAR ◽  
Murat Şahin ALAGÖZ
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Crus ◽  
Strut Graft ◽  
Alar Rim

The Effects of Lateral Crural Tensioning with an Articulated Alar Rim Graft Versus Lateral Crural Strut Graft on Nasal Function

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-285
Author(s):  
Mickey Kondo ◽  
Carolyn Orgain ◽  
Raquel Alvarado ◽  
George N. Marcells ◽  
Richard J. Harvey
Keyword(s):  
Strut Graft ◽  
Nasal Function ◽  
Alar Rim

scholarly journals Costal Cartilage Lateral Crural Strut Graft for Correction of External Nasal Valve Dysfunction in Primary and Revision Rhinoplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132098394
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Taha ◽  
Christian A. Hall ◽  
Harry E. Zylicz ◽  
William T. Barham ◽  
Margaret B. Westbrook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Costal Cartilage ◽  
Primary Group ◽  
Nasal Valve ◽  
Lateral Crus ◽  
Valve Dysfunction ◽  
Score Improvement ◽  
Revision Rhinoplasty ◽  
Final Score ◽  
Sinonasal Outcome Test ◽  
External Nasal Valve

Objective: To evaluate and compare the costal cartilage lateral crural strut graft’s (LCSG) ability to support a weak lateral crus in patients with external nasal valve dysfunction (EVD) undergoing primary versus revision functional rhinoplasty. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of 26 patients (mean [SD]: 40.23 [6.75] years of age; 10 [38%] females) with clinically diagnosed EVD, who underwent primary versus revision functional rhinoplasty with the use of a costal cartilage LCSG (10 [38%] primary functional rhinoplasty patients and the 16 [62%] revision patients). Preoperative and 12-month postoperative subjective and objective functional measurements along with statistical analysis were performed. Results: While all baseline demographic and preoperative functional measurement scores were similar between the 2 groups, the primary cohort’s preoperative scores were higher overall. Follow-up was a mean of 14.58 months. The primary group demonstrated a greater difference in score improvement postoperatively in all categories. All patients had significantly improved visual analog scale (VAS), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale, 22-Item Sinonasal Outcome Test, and nasal peak inspiratory flow (NPIF) scores. When comparing the overall score outcome and surgical efficacy of the LCSG, both groups had near equal final score outcomes with the exception of VASL and NPIF. Conclusion: The LCSG is a viable and versatile option in the management of EVD for both primary and revision rhinoplasty patients.

Construct Stability of C2 Replacement Strategies

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian M. Puttlitz ◽  
Robert P. Melcher ◽  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Dezsoe Jeszenszky ◽  
Ju¨rgen Harms
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Posterior Fixation ◽  
Camera Motion ◽  
Anterior Plate ◽  
Intact Specimen ◽  
Strut Graft ◽  
Significant Difference

Reconstruction of C2 after tumor destruction and resection remains a significant challenge. Most constructs utilize a strutgraft with plate or screw fixation. A novel C2 prosthesis combining a titanium mesh cage with bilateral C1 shelves and a T-plate has been used successfully in 18 patients. Supplemental posterior instrumentation includes C0-C3 or C1-C3. Biomechanical comparisons of this C2 prosthesis with traditional fixation options have not been reported. Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C0-C5) were tested intact. Next, the C2 prosthesis, and strut graft and anterior plate constructs were tested with occiput-C3 and C1-C3 posterior fixation. Pure moment loads (up to 1.5 N-m) were applied in flexion and extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. C1-C3 motion was evaluated using 3 camera motion analysis. Statistical significance was evaluated using one-way repeated measures ANOVA with Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc pairwise comparisons. All constructs provided a statistically significant decrease in motion in this C2 corpectomy model as compared to the intact condition. There was no significant difference in C1-C3 motion between the 4 constructs, regardless of whether the occiput was included in the fixation. Under these loading conditions, both the C2 prostheisis and strut-graft-plate constructs provided initial C1-C3 stability beyond that of the intact specimen. The occiput does not need to be included in the posterior instrumentation.

Rotation-Transposition Correction of Nasal Deformity in Tessier Number 1 and 2 Clefts

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoon Rashid ◽  
Muhammad Zia ul Islam ◽  
Muhammad Sarmad Tamimy ◽  
Ehtesham ul Haq ◽  
Samina Aman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Nasal Wall ◽  
Nasal Deformity ◽  
Postoperative Results ◽  
Transposition Flap ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Minimal Scarring ◽  
Flap Viability ◽  
Alar Rim

Objective: To formulate a standardized procedure for repair of the nasal component of Tessier number 1 and 2 clefts. Patients and Methods: The procedure was performed from 1998 to 2007 in 13 patients with congenital nasal clefts of different degrees of expression corresponding to Tessier 1 and 2. The patients’ ages ranged from 3 months to 28 years. There were 10 male and three female patients. In the absence of any standard published technique for these rare defects, we devised our own method, which we find uniformly applicable to all such cases. We use a composite muco-chondro-cutaneous lateral alar flap to recreate the alar rim. The resulting defect on the lateral nasal wall is then covered with a transposition flap from the dorsum. An alar rim z-plasty was added in cases where notching was evident. Results: In all cases, no problem of flap viability was encountered and all healed well with minimal scarring. The postoperative results were satisfactory and have remained stable over an average 6-month follow-up period. Conclusions: We recommend this technique to be used for the correction of nasal deformity associated with Tessier clefts number 1 and 2. We feel that this technique is relatively simple and easily reproducible.

Free Vascularized Fibular Strut Graft in the Treatment of Kyphosis

Spine ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1273-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
KIYOSHI KANEDA ◽  
CHIKAHARU KURAKAMI ◽  
AKIO MINAMI
Keyword(s):  
Strut Graft ◽  
Fibular Strut
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document