THE EFFECT OF REALISTIC MATHEMATHIC EDUCATION MODELS ON MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY REVIEWED FROM STUDENT’S LEARNING STYLES

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Dini Apriani ◽  
Mujib Mujib ◽  
Dona Dinda Pratiwi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Mathematical Education ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Education Model ◽  
Essay Tests ◽  
Better Than

<span class="fontstyle0">Abstract </span><span class="fontstyle2">This study aims to see the effect of realistic mathemathic education models<br />on students' mathematical reasoning abilities in terms of learning styles. This type of<br />research is quantitative. Data collection techniques used were essay tests and<br />interviews. The data analysis technique used is hypothesis testing using 2-way anava.<br />But before the anava test is carried out, the normality, homogeneity and balance tests<br />are performed. Based on the data that is known that normal data, based on the same<br />and balanced variance obtained by the 2-way Anova test results indicate that there<br />is an influence of the RTE model on students' mathematical reasoning ability, namely<br />the reasoning ability of students with RME model treatment is better than the<br />mathematical reasoning ability with conventional treatment methods. In addition<br />there is the influence of student learning styles on students' reasoning abilities.<br />Furthermore, mathematical reasoning ability of students who have who have a visual<br />learning style is better than students who have an auditory and kinesthetic learning<br />style. While students who have kinesthetic learning styles are better than students<br />who have auditory learning styles. There is no interaction between the treatment of<br />learning with the learning styles category of students. Means, there is no difference<br />in the effect between the learning treatment and learning styles of students on the<br />ability of mathematical reasoning on students with the treatment of learning using<br />the Realistic Mathematics Education model or using conventional learning models.<br /></span><span class="fontstyle0">Key Word</span><span class="fontstyle2">: Realistic Mathematical Education Model, Mathematical<br />Reasoning Ability, Learning Styles</span> <br /><br />

scholarly journals PROFIL KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN INDUKTIF MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA UNIPA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Agus Haryono ◽  
Benidiktus Tanujaya
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Inductive Reasoning ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problems

<p>The purpose of this research was to study the profile of students' mathematical inductive reasoning abilities regarding visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles in solving mathematical problems. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive approach. The results of the study showed that UNIPA mathematics education students tended to study with Visual Learning Styles. Students with this learning style tend to have inductive mathematical reasoning abilities that are better than inductive mathematical reasoning abilities of students learning with auditorial learning styles and those who learn with the kinesthetic learning style. Also, Mathematics Education students of the University of Papua do not have the ability to examine the validity of an argument and find patterns or characteristics of mathematical symptoms to generalize.</p>

scholarly journals The Influence of Realistic Mathemathic Education Model on Mathematical Reasoning Ability Viewed from Student Learning Styles

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dini Apriani ◽  
Mujib Mujib ◽  
Dona Dinda Pratiwi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Essay Tests ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This study aims to see the effect of realistic mathemathic education models on students' mathematical reasoning abilities in terms of learning styles. This type of research is quantitative. Data collection techniques used are essay tests and interviews. The data analysis technique used is hypothesis testing using anava 2 roads. However, before the anova test is carried out, the normality, homogeneity and balance test are carried out first. Based on the data that has been known that normal data, based on the same and balanced variance, the 2-way ANOVA test results show that there is an influence of the RTE model on students' mathematical reasoning ability, namely the reasoning ability of students with the RME model treatment is better than mathematical reasoning ability with conventional treatment methods. In addition, there is the influence of student learning styles on students' reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran JUCAMA Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Berbicara di Prodi PBSI IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Darmuki ◽  
Ahmad Hariyadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Level I ◽  
Better Than

Focus this is research to determine which are the achievements of better speaking learning: (1), learning model JUCAMA or Conventional, (2) Visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) On models learning JUCAMA,  which are the achievements of better speaking learning, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.This type of research is quasi-experimental with 2 × 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program, which consists of nine classes with a total of 288 students. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling, selected three classes, namely the level of I-A, IB, and IC. The sample consisted of 93 students, with details of 31 IA students as an experiment, 31 IB level students as a control, and 31 IC level students as a trial. Data collection instruments using learning style questionnaires, and learning achievement tests that have been validated by the validators. The test instrument was tested in PBSI level I study program after being tested and then analyzed its reliability, distinguishing features and difficulty levels. The prerequisite tests include the normality test using the Lilliefors method and the variance homogeneity test using the Bartlett method. With α = 0.05, it can be concluded that the sample comes from populations that are normally distributed and have a homogeneous variance.In this study it can be concluded that: (1) students with learning JUCAMA had speaking learning achievement better than the students with conventional learning, (2) achievement of learning speaking students who have a visual learning style is better than the speaking learning achievement of students who have auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. While the speaking achievement students who have learning styles of auditory as well as students who have a kinesthetic learning style, (3) On learning JUCAMA, there is no difference between speaking achievement in each learning style. Keyword: jucama, learning style, learning achievement, speaking

scholarly journals Pengaruh Penerapan Teori Van Hiele Berbantuan Software Wingeom Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa pada Materi Geometri

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Fitri Amalia Izzati ◽  
Hadi Kusmanto ◽  
Toheri Toheri
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Average Percentage ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Van Hiele Theory ◽  
Essay Tests

One of the purpose of mathematics is to develop students’ mathematical reasoning abilities. But in the fact indicate that objective can’t be realized optimally. This research aims to determine the effect of application Van Hiele theory aided software wingeom to mathematical reasoning ability students on geometry. This research is case study with a sample of 40 students and using technique purposive sampling. The technique of collecting data used questionnaire and essay tests. Based on analysis of questionnaire obtained an average percentage of 63,04%, that means the student responded strongly. While mathematical reasoning ability is quite an average of 67,25%. Based on the hypothesis test analysis whit significance 5% show there is the effect of application Van Hiele theory aided software wingeom to mathematical reasoning ability on geometry. From the regression equation obtained  = 8,482 + 0,847 X. The coefficient is positive, that means there is a positive correlation between the application Van Hiele theory aided software Wingeom and mathematical reasoning ability. The coefficient of determination 0,166 meaning that 16% variable mathematical reasoning ability is determined by the Van Hiele theory aided application software wingeom, while the remaining 84% is explained by other variable. The application of Van Hiele theory aided Wingeom software significantly affect students’ mathematical reasoning ability on geometry.

scholarly journals The Development of Teacher Efforts to Improve The Mathematical Reasoning Abilities Through The Problem Based Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Rahmah ◽  
Rahmah Johar ◽  
Saminan Saminan
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Made In

The purpose of this study is to determine teacher efforts to improve students' mathematical reasoning abilities through the Problem Based Learning model. This research is a classroom action research consisting of two cycles, namely planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The research subjects were 28 students of class VII-1 SMP Negeri 2 Siantan, Anambas Islands Regency. The research instrument used was the teacher's observation sheet and the mathematical reasoning ability test. Data collection is done through observation and tests. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively and described in a descriptive form. The results obtained are the mathematical reasoning ability of students in the first cycle of 2.27 and the second cycle of 2.83. Based on the results of the study showed that the efforts of teachers made in the second cycle were better than the first cycle, so that an increase in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the second cycle was in the good category.

scholarly journals The Difference between Mathematical Reasoning Ability Improvement by Learning with Meta Cognitive Approach Aided Probing and Prompting Techniques in SMP Negeri 4 SeiSuka

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadran Hamdani Siregar ◽  
Kms. M. AminFauzi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Technical Approach ◽  
Cognitive Approach ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

<em>The purpose of this study were: (1) analyzed the differences in students’ mathematical reasoning ability </em><em>improvement taught by metacognition approach aided probing technique (PMT-probing) and </em><em>metacognition approach aided prompting technique (PMT-prompting); and (2) described the process of</em><br /><em>the students’ responses in solving mathematical reasoning abilities. This study was a quasi </em><em>experimentalresearch. The population in this study were all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 4 </em><em>SeiSuka, with a purposive sampling techniques, the obtained sample was VIII-1 and VIII-2. The </em><em>research instrument used a test of mathematical reasoning ability, and had qualified the criteria of </em><em>content validity, and reliability coefficient of 0.819. Anova two ways was used to analyze the difference </em><em>of mathematical reasoning ability improvement, while descriptive analysis was used to analyze </em><em>students’ answers process. The results showed that: (1) There were differences in students’ </em><em>mathematical reasoning skills improvement which were taught by metacognition approach aided </em><em>probing techniques and the students taught by prompting technical approach; and (2) The process of </em><em>the students’ responses on students’ mathematical reasoning abilitythrough learning with metacognition </em><em>approach aided by prompting techniques was better than metacognition approach aided by probing</em><br /><em>techniques.</em>

scholarly journals Reasoning ability through challenge based learning kahoot

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-188
Author(s):  
Wati Susilawati ◽  
Kartika Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Learning Improvement ◽  
Conflict Processes ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Challenge Based Learning ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Better Than

The main objective is to analyze the improvement of mathematical reasoning ability through the challenge based learning with kahoot application. An experimental study, pre-test and post-test control group design. The population subjects were all students of class XI of the SMAN 26 Bandung, by involving a sample of three classes through random sampling techniques from five parallel classes available. Instrument for mathematical reasoning tests. Findings: There was improvement in mathematical reasoning abilities of students who obtained a challenge based learning assisted by the kahoot application, challenge based learning without a kahoot, and conventional learning. Improvement of mathematical reasoning abilities of students who obtained a challenge based learning with kahoot application is better than challenge based learning without the kahoot, and expository learning. Challenge based learning kahoot applications can facilitate conflict processes, discovery, social interaction, and reflective to improve students’s mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF LEARNING WITH ABDUCTIVE-DEDUCTIVE STRATEGY TOWARDS THE ACHIEVEMENT OF REASONING ABILITY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Ali Shodikin
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
School Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of learning with abductive-deductive strategy towards the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities of high school students. Research carried out an experimental pretest-posttest design and the control group was not randomized in class XI student at one high school in Pati, Central Java, Indonesia. Data analysis was conducted quantitative research based on early mathematical ability categories (KAM) and overall. The results showed that the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities that students acquire learning abductive-deductive strategy better than students who received the expository learning. In more detail of KAM categories, only middle category that show achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities better. While in upper and under categories have the same reasoning abilities achievements. This research is expected teachers can encourage students to do abduction and deduction in the learning achievement of students’ mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals Mathematical reasoning abilities: The Impact of Novick's Learning and Somatic, Auditory, Visual, Intellectual Learning Styles

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
Muhamad Yasin ◽  
Nasiroh Nasiroh ◽  
Abi Fadila ◽  
Sitti Hartinah ◽  
Novalia Novalia
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Quality Of Education ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
The Impact

Every life needs a very important role especially the role in education. Improving the quality of education can be pursued by the use of appropriate learning models so as to improve students' reasoning abilities. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the influence of Novick's learning model and the learning model that is centered on educators on students' mathematical reasoning abilities, Knowing the interaction between learning models and SAVI learning styles (Somatic, Auditory, Visualization, Intelectually) on mathematical reasoning abilities learners. This research uses the Quasy Experiment Design method. The results obtained from this study are that learning by using Novick's learning model is more effective against mathematical reasoning for students, there is no interaction between Novick's learning model and SAVI learning style on mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk Write Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas XI IPA MAN Kota Padang

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irwan Irwan ◽  
Devi Permata Sari
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Teaching Model ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Final Test ◽  
Cooperative Teaching ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Conventional Teaching ◽  
Better Than

The problems that occur in the field is the low of students’ mathematical reasoning abilities in the class XI IPA MAN Padang. It can be seen from the finding of observation and analysis toward the result of test given to the students. To overcome the problems, the cooperative teaching model Think Talk Write is used. The purpose of the study is to find out the effct of the cooperative teaching model Think Talk Write application toward students’ mathematical reasoning abilities in the class XI IPA MAN Padang. The research is quasy experiment. The population of the research is all students in the class XI IPA MAN Padang. The technique used for the sampling is random sampling. The sample of the reasearch is the students in the class XI IPA2 MAN 1 Padang as experiment class and the students in the class XI IPA1 MAN 1 Padang as control class. The instrument used in the reasearch is the test that consists of the first test to see the initial ability of the students and the final test to see toward students’ mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the finding of the research, it can be concluded: first, the students’ mathematical reasoning abilities which is taught by the cooperative teaching model Think Talk Write is better than those which is taught b conventional teaching. Second, the students’ mathematical reasoning ability who have high, fair and low abilities which is taught by the cooperative teaching model Think Talk Write is better than those which is taught b conventional teaching.Keywords: Cooperative Learnig Model Think Talk Write type ,Mathematical Reasoning Ability

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document