THE GEOTHERMAL WATER TREATMENT FOR WATER AND ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1245-1254
Author(s):  
Mihaela-Ana Mitrasca ◽  
Ion Mirel ◽  
Emilia-Valentina Pantea ◽  
Daniela-Mariana Abrudan
2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Alicia Quesnel ◽  
Aaron Rogers

This article provides an assessment of how the findings of the Alberta Court of Appeal in OMERS Energy v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board) compare and conflict with the approach historically taken by Canadian courts addressing the capability of a well and related issues. The authors then provide an analysis of uncertainties created by the findings of the Court and discuss the implications of the decision for the upstream oil and gas industry. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 339-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Kmiecik ◽  
Barbara Tomaszewska ◽  
Katarzyna Wątor ◽  
Michał Bodzek ◽  
Mariola Rajca ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 468
Author(s):  
P. A. Rowbotham

This paper addresses the issue of public participation in one of Alberta's most important administrative tribunals, the Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB). The ERCB makes significant decisions regarding the exploration for, and development of, natural resources in Alberta. In the past twenty-five years the public has taken an increasing interest in the types of issues which face the ERCB. The following essay discusses the legislative scheme which permits and encourages public participation in these decisions. It also addresses the increase in public participation, and focuses on two specific events: the Crown of the Continent Project in the Waterton Lakes area of Alberta and the Caroline/Beaverhill Lake Gas Development Applications.


2017 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Tomaszewska ◽  
Mariola Rajca ◽  
Ewa Kmiecik ◽  
Michał Bodzek ◽  
Wiesław Bujakowski ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 521
Author(s):  
John E. Lowe ◽  
Jonathan M. Liteplo

This article highlights regulatory and legislative developments during the period of May 2007 through April 2008 that are of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The article primarily examines decisions and other related jurisprudence of the National Energy Board and the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, the latter of which was split into the Energy Resources Conservation Board and the Alberta Utilities Commission on 1 January 2008. Additionally, the article details policy and legislative developments affecting the National Energy Board and the two new Alberta regulators. Regulatory developments at the Alberta Surface Rights Board and in other jurisdictions are also considered.


1969 ◽  
pp. 286 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Elder

Environmental impact assessment, as practiced in Alberta, includes considerable social impact assessment requirements. The author, while favouring a comprehensive assessment and project approval process, argues that the Minister of the Environment Jacks the legal authority to require project proponents to carry out socio-economic impact assessments. According to the author, the Energy Resources Conservation Board's power to require and consider social impact assessment in the approval process is also doubtful. Legislative clarification is desirable.


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
David J. Farmer ◽  
Layne N. Thiessen

This article highlights important legislative and regulatory developments of relevance to energy lawyers, including those involving electricity matters and related jurisprudence that arose between May 2012 and May 2013. The authors have reviewed a wide variety of subject areas, including examining decisions of key regulatory agencies such as the National Energy Board, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Alberta’s Energy Resources Conservation Board, the Alberta Utilities Commission, the Alberta Surface Rights Board, the Ontario Energy Board, the Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal, and the World Trade Organization. Additionally, federal and provincial legislation and regulations of significance introduced during this period are canvassed.


1981 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Robert M. Perrin

Decisions of the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board arising over the past year are reviewed, along with new legislation in British Co lumbia and related decisions of the B.C. Energy Commission.


1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 738
Author(s):  
Keith F. Miller ◽  
Erin R. Bourgeault ◽  
Curtis G. Bunz ◽  
Patricia Quinton-Campbell

This article provides a brief review of recent legislative, regulatory and environmental developments of particular interest to oil and gas lawyers. Part Two of the article highlights specific legislative developments, including those affecting environmental regulation. Emphasis is placed on recent federal and Alberta legislative developments along with some noteworthy developments in British Columbia. Part Three considers regulatory developments in the context of recent tribunal decisions at both the federal and provincial levels. Federally, the article examines recent decisions by the National Energy Board. At the provincial level, decisions by the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board and the Alberta Public Utilities Board (now combined to form the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board) are considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document