scholarly journals Research on Development of China Air Carrier Safety Oversight System

Author(s):  
Zhi-Hui Xie ◽  
Yu-Ping Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Mako ◽  
Marek Pilat ◽  
Nikola Staricna ◽  
Peter Koscak ◽  
Daniela Marasova
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sifat Rahman

Ethics and ethical principles extend to all spheres of human activity. They apply to our dealings with each other, with animals and the environment. They should govern our interactions not only in conducting research but also in commerce, employment and politics. Ethics serve to identify good, desirable or acceptable conduct and provide reasons for those conclusions. Fair subject selection is the first and foremost concern which must be ensured before initiating a research project.  Which subjects may enroll in the research is determined by the study’s inclusion or exclusion criteria. One of the important aspects of fair subject selection is to have an oversight system through International Review Board (IRB) to review to conduct the research and to have approval whether subject selection is fair or not.


Author(s):  
Chad Jones ◽  
Michael Ogawa ◽  
James Shearer ◽  
Anna Tikhonova ◽  
Kwan-Liu Ma
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary M. Connors ◽  
Robert Mauro ◽  
Irving C. Statler

2019 ◽  
pp. 225-242
Author(s):  
Alisdair A. Gillespie ◽  
Siobhan Weare

This chapter examines the jurisdiction and structure of tribunals. It then considers two very different tribunals through the use of case studies, namely the Employment Tribunals and the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Tribunals have existed for many years but have traditionally operated as an oversight system for administrative issues. In recent years, the number of tribunals has increased and their work has begun to involve more complicated legal questions. Tribunals are now, in essence, a parallel system of dispute resolution and their complexity is recognized by the fact that their presiding officers now bear the title of ‘judge’. This chapter examines this parallel judicial system and identifies similarities between and differences from court justice.


Author(s):  
Alisdair Gillespie ◽  
Siobhan Weare

This chapter examines the jurisdiction and structure of tribunals. It then considers two very different tribunals through the use of case studies, namely the Employment Tribunals and the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Tribunals have existed for many years but have traditionally operated as an oversight system for administrative issues. In recent years, the number of tribunals has increased and their work has begun to involve more complicated legal questions. Tribunals are now, in essence, a parallel system of dispute resolution and their complexity is recognized by the fact that their presiding officers now bear the title of ‘judge’. This chapter examines this parallel judicial system and identifies similarities between and differences from court justice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document