scholarly journals A Method of 3D Point Cloud Volume Calculation Based on Slice Method

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhi ◽  
Yikun Zhang ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Kaifeng Yang ◽  
Hui Xia
Keyword(s):  
Point Cloud ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Volume Calculation ◽  
Slice Method

scholarly journals Beyond 2D inventories : synoptic 3D landslide volume calculation from repeat LiDAR data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Bernard ◽  
Dimitri Lague ◽  
Philippe Steer
Keyword(s):  
Point Cloud ◽  
Volume Estimation ◽  
Airborne Lidar ◽  
Aerial Images ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Volume Calculation ◽  
Landslide Volume ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Multi Temporal ◽  
Areal Mapping

Abstract. Efficient and robust landslide mapping and volume estimation is essential to rapidly infer landslide spatial distribution, to quantify the role of triggering events on landscape changes and to assess direct and secondary landslide-related geomorphic hazards. Many efforts have been made during the last decades to develop landslide areal mapping methods, based on 2D satellite or aerial images, and to constrain empirical volume-area (V-A) allowing in turn to offer indirect estimates of landslide volume. Despite these efforts, some major issues remain including the uncertainty of the V-A scaling, landslide amalgamation and the under-detection of reactivated landslides. To address these issues, we propose a new semi-automatic 3D point cloud differencing method to detect geomorphic changes, obtain robust landslide inventories and directly measure the volume and geometric properties of landslides. This method is based on the M3C2 algorithm and was applied to a multi-temporal airborne LiDAR dataset of the Kaikoura region, New Zealand, following the Mw 7.8 earthquake of 14 November 2016. We demonstrate that 3D point cloud differencing offers a greater sensitivity to detect small changes than a classical difference of DEMs (digital elevation models). In a small 5 km2 area, prone to landslide reactivation and amalgamation, where a previous study identified 27 landslides, our method is able to detect 1431 landslide sources and 853 deposits with a total volume of 908,055 ± 215,640 m3 and 1,008,626 ± 172,745 m3, respectively. This high number of landslides is set by the ability of our method to detect subtle changes and therefore small landslides with a carefully constrained lower limit of 20 m2 (90 % with A 

scholarly journals Accurate Volume Calculation Driven by Delaunay Triangulation for Coal Measurement

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yong Liu ◽  
Yanwei Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Delaunay Triangulation ◽  
Integral Method ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Calculation Formula ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Base Plane ◽  
Volume Calculation ◽  
Good Balance ◽  
Running Time ◽  
Delaunay Triangles

Volume calculation from 3D point cloud is widely used in engineering and applications. The existing methods either have large errors or are time-consuming. This paper focuses on the coal measurement. Based on the triangular mesh generated from the point cloud, each triangle is projected downward to the base plane to form a voxel. We derive the calculation formula of voxel by an integral method, which is more efficient than the method of decomposing voxel into tetrahedrons and more accurate than slicing methods. Furthermore, this paper proposes a Delaunay triangulation-driven volume calculation (DTVC) method. DTVC does not preserve the Delaunay triangles but directly calculates the volume in the process of triangulation. It saves memory and running time. Experimental results show that DTVC has achieved a good balance between error and efficiency.

Volume Calculation for Power Equipment Point Cloud Based on Concave Hull Slice Method

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu Hongyan ◽  
Yang Ning ◽  
Chen Hui ◽  
Liang Weibin ◽  
Bilal Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Point Cloud ◽  
Power Equipment ◽  
Volume Calculation ◽  
Slice Method

scholarly journals Label3DMaize: toolkit for 3D point cloud data annotation of maize shoots

GigaScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng Miao ◽  
Weiliang Wen ◽  
Yinglun Li ◽  
Sheng Wu ◽  
Chao Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Plant Structure ◽  
Data Annotation ◽  
Cloud Data ◽  
Point Cloud Segmentation ◽  
Different Growth Stages

Abstract Background The 3D point cloud is the most direct and effective data form for studying plant structure and morphology. In point cloud studies, the point cloud segmentation of individual plants to organs directly determines the accuracy of organ-level phenotype estimation and the reliability of the 3D plant reconstruction. However, highly accurate, automatic, and robust point cloud segmentation approaches for plants are unavailable. Thus, the high-throughput segmentation of many shoots is challenging. Although deep learning can feasibly solve this issue, software tools for 3D point cloud annotation to construct the training dataset are lacking. Results We propose a top-to-down point cloud segmentation algorithm using optimal transportation distance for maize shoots. We apply our point cloud annotation toolkit for maize shoots, Label3DMaize, to achieve semi-automatic point cloud segmentation and annotation of maize shoots at different growth stages, through a series of operations, including stem segmentation, coarse segmentation, fine segmentation, and sample-based segmentation. The toolkit takes ∼4–10 minutes to segment a maize shoot and consumes 10–20% of the total time if only coarse segmentation is required. Fine segmentation is more detailed than coarse segmentation, especially at the organ connection regions. The accuracy of coarse segmentation can reach 97.2% that of fine segmentation. Conclusion Label3DMaize integrates point cloud segmentation algorithms and manual interactive operations, realizing semi-automatic point cloud segmentation of maize shoots at different growth stages. The toolkit provides a practical data annotation tool for further online segmentation research based on deep learning and is expected to promote automatic point cloud processing of various plants.

scholarly journals UAV Based Estimation of Forest Leaf Area Index (LAI) through Oblique Photogrammetry

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 803
Author(s):  
Lingchen Lin ◽  
Kunyong Yu ◽  
Xiong Yao ◽  
Yangbo Deng ◽  
Zhenbang Hao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Point Cloud ◽  
Forest Canopy ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Vertical Direction ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
3D Point Cloud ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Better Than

As a key canopy structure parameter, the estimation method of the Leaf Area Index (LAI) has always attracted attention. To explore a potential method to estimate forest LAI from 3D point cloud at low cost, we took photos from different angles of the drone and set five schemes (O (0°), T15 (15°), T30 (30°), OT15 (0° and 15°) and OT30 (0° and 30°)), which were used to reconstruct 3D point cloud of forest canopy based on photogrammetry. Subsequently, the LAI values and the leaf area distribution in the vertical direction derived from five schemes were calculated based on the voxelized model. Our results show that the serious lack of leaf area in the middle and lower layers determines that the LAI estimate of O is inaccurate. For oblique photogrammetry, schemes with 30° photos always provided better LAI estimates than schemes with 15° photos (T30 better than T15, OT30 better than OT15), mainly reflected in the lower part of the canopy, which is particularly obvious in low-LAI areas. The overall structure of the single-tilt angle scheme (T15, T30) was relatively complete, but the rough point cloud details could not reflect the actual situation of LAI well. Multi-angle schemes (OT15, OT30) provided excellent leaf area estimation (OT15: R2 = 0.8225, RMSE = 0.3334 m2/m2; OT30: R2 = 0.9119, RMSE = 0.1790 m2/m2). OT30 provided the best LAI estimation accuracy at a sub-voxel size of 0.09 m and the best checkpoint accuracy (OT30: RMSE [H] = 0.2917 m, RMSE [V] = 0.1797 m). The results highlight that coupling oblique photography and nadiral photography can be an effective solution to estimate forest LAI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document