Hacia el fin del dogma "voluntad es capacidad" en el derecho civil chileno

2018 ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Sergio Arenas Benavides
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Legal Capacity ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
The Law

ResumenLa idea de que los incapaces absolutos no tienen voluntad no es acorde a la realidad natural de los seres humanos, y por tanto no debe seguir siendo invocada por los juristas chilenos. Sólo los bebés y los que han caído en comao tienen una patología enajenante severa carecen de una voluntad denida. Los demás sí tienen, sólo que el derecho no considera tales voluntades como sucientes para obligarse. Por otro lado, es poco congruente que no se reconozca voluntad en un área de nuestro derecho civil (materia contractual) y sí en otras (materia extracontractual).Palabras clave: Voluntad; Niños; Capacidad; Demente; Derecho civil.AbstractThe notion that persons with absolute incapacity have no will is not accordance with the natural reality of human beings, and therefore should no longer be relied upon by the Chilean jurists. Only babies and those who have fallen in coma or have a severe alienating pathology lack a denite will. Others have it, only that the law does not consider those wills as sucient to obligate oneself. Moreover, it is incongruous that such will is not recognized in some areas of our civil law (contract law) while it is in others (tort law). Keywords: Will; Children; Legal capacity; Insane person; Civil law.

Incumplimiento de deberes conyugales y acciones indemnizatorias: Un análisis sobre su procedencia

2015 ◽  
pp. 51-100
Author(s):  
Fabián González Cazorla
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
General Will ◽  
Present Discussion ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
The Family

Resumen En la actualidad la responsabilidad civil ha sido objeto de grandes avances e importantes desarrollos respecto de su aplicabilidad. Uno de las materias de las que ya se puede comenzar a hablar, o al menos discutir, es sobre la responsabilidad civil en el ámbito de la familia y particularmente en la relación conyugal. En ese sentido, este trabajo pretende ser un aporte a la discusión actual sobre la aplicación de las normas de la responsabilidad civil por incumplimiento de deberes matrimoniales e intentar mostrar al lector cómo podría operar ésta, ya sea aplicando un régimen contractual o extracontractual. Las interpretaciones sobre cómo se entiende el matrimonio, los principios rectores del derecho de familia y del derecho civil en general, serán los elementos determinantes para llegar a una conclusión que no cierra la discusión, sino que genera un espacio de reflexión y cuestionamiento. Palabras clave: Matrimonio, deber conyugal, responsabilidad, indemnización.   BREACH OF MARITAL DUTIES AND INDEMNITY ACTIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF ITS APPLICABILITY Abstract Nowadays the Civil Liability has been object of the greatest changes and important developments regarding its application. One of the subjects we can refer to or at least discuss, is Civil Liability in the ambit of the family and particularly the conjugal relationship. That is how this work intends to be a contribution to the present discussion regarding the application of rules of Civil Liability for the breach of marital duties, and also intends to show the reader how this could operate, either using a contract law or tort law. The interpretations of how marriage is understood, the guiding principles of family law and of civil law in general, will be the determinant elements to get to a conclusion that does not close the discussion, but creates a space for reflection and questioning. Key words: marriage, marital duty, liability, compensation.

scholarly journals CODIFICATION, CONSOLIDATION, RESTATEMENT? HOW BEST TO SYSTEMISE THE MODERN LAW OF TORT

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-305
Author(s):  
Paula Giliker
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Scholarship ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Law ◽  
Codal Provisions ◽  
Code Civil

AbstractThe law of tort (or extra or non-contractual liability) has been criticised for being imprecise and lacking coherence. Legal systems have sought to systemise its rules in a number of ways. While civil law systems generally place tort law in a civil code, common law systems have favoured case-law development supported by limited statutory intervention consolidating existing legal rules. In both systems, case law plays a significant role in maintaining the flexibility and adaptability of the law. This article will examine, comparatively, different means of systemising the law of tort, contrasting civil law codification (taking the example of recent French proposals to update the tort provisions of the Code civil) with common law statutory consolidation and case-law intervention (using examples taken from English and Australian law). In examining the degree to which these formal means of systemisation are capable of improving the accessibility, intelligibility, clarity and predictability of the law of tort, it will also address the role played by informal sources, be they ambitious restatements of law or other means. It will be argued that given the nature of tort law, at best, any form of systemisation (be it formal or informal) can only seek to minimise any lack of precision and coherence. However, as this comparative study shows, further steps are needed, both in updating outdated codal provisions and rethinking the type of legal scholarship that might best assist the courts.

Classifying precontractual liability: a comparative analysis

Legal Studies ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Dietrich
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Common Elements ◽  
Ongoing Debate ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
The Common ◽  
Initial Focus

The common law has solved questions of liability arising in the context of precontractual negotiations by resort to a range of different doctrines and approaches, adopting in effect ‘piecemeal’ solutions to questions of precontractual liability. Consequently, debate has arisen as to how best to classify or categorise claims for precontractual work and as to which doctrines are best suited to solving problems arising from anticipated contracts. The purpose of this article is to consider this question of how best to classify (cases of) precontractual liability. The initial focus will be on the ongoing debate as to whether principles of contract law or principles of unjust enrichment can better solve problems of precontractual liability. I will be suggesting that unjust enrichment theory offers little by way of explanation of cases of precontractual liability and, indeed, draws on principles of contract law in determining questions of liability for precontractual services rendered, though it does so by formulating those principles under different guises. Irrespective, however, of the doctrines utilised by the common law to impose liability, it is possible to identify a number of common elements unifying all cases of precontractual liability. In identifying such common elements of liability, it is necessary to draw on principles of both contract and tort law. How, then, should cases of precontractual liability best be classified? A consideration of the issue of classification of precontractual liability from a perspective of German civil law will demonstrate that a better understanding of cases of precontractual liability will be gained by classifying such cases as lying between the existing categories of contract and tort.

scholarly journals Non-Delimitation of Incompetency Denotations in Jurisprudence and Law and the Contradiction of some of its Titles to the Law on Non-Litigious Matters

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sorush Niknamian
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Legal Capacity ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Mind

“Incompetency” literally means prohibition and it is commonly used to point to an individual being deprived of his rights to take possession of his properties and his financial rights by the law. And, in other words, the incompetents are the individuals that do not possess “the legal capacity to enjoy a certain right” and are deprived from taking possession of their properties and if such a taking possession of the properties by an incompetent occurs, it is invalid and cannot take effect. In the legal system of Islam, the individual with a sort of a disease that features certain types of conditions leading to the weakness of the mind or insanity is called an incompetent. But the example cases of the incompetent and incompetency have not been delimited in the jurisprudence and law. Thus, the investigation of the instruments of incompetency from the perspective of the jurisprudential texts and the statutory provisions via offering an assumption indicating the non-delimitation of the incompetency instruments scope has resulted in conflicts in the non-litigious affairs law with the civil procedure, the necessity to rethink the causes of insanity as one instrument of incompetency in the civil law, the centrality of the incompetency for its setting the ground for the exertion of the law and the non-litigious affairs regulations as well as the incompetency of some patients with nervous diseases like hysterical conversion and dissociative hysteria and so forth. Therefore, conceptualizing the incompetency, the present study aims at assessing, then criticizing and investigating, the proofs offered by the proponents and the opponents of the incompetency of the patients with hysteria so as to consequently conclude an assumption regarding the hysteric patients’ incompetency and the relevant contradictions, if any, with the non-litigious matters law and civil procedure.

Introduction

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Cooter ◽  
Ariel Porat
Keyword(s):  
Social Welfare ◽  
Strict Liability ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Cost

This book examines how the law of torts, contracts, and restitution can be improved by showing how private law reduces the cost of accidents, lubricates bargains, and encourages unrequested benefits. It considers the two pervasive rules of tort law that provide incentives for actors to reduce accident costs: strict liability and negligence. It also explains how contract law achieves effiency through the remedy of damages and how restitution law allows benefactors to recover gains that their beneficiaries wrongfully obtained from them. The book makes three central claims: misalignments in tort law should be removed; in contract law, promisee's incentives should be improved; and the law should recognize some right of compensation for those who produce unrequested benefits. Each claim is based on the desire to reform private law and to make it more effective in promoting social welfare.

Personalized Legal Areas

2021 ◽  
pp. 61-84
Author(s):  
Omri Ben-Shahar ◽  
Ariel Porat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Law

This chapter illustrates personalized law “in action” by examining it in three areas of the law: standards of care under the common law tort doctrine of negligence, mandated consumer protections in contract law, and criminal sanctions. In each area, the chapter examines personalization of commands along several dimensions. In tort law, standards of care could vary according to each injurer’s riskiness and skill, to reduce the costs of accidents. In contract law, mandatory protections could vary according to the value they provide each consumer and differential cost they impose on firms, to allocate protections where, and only where, they are justified. And in criminal law, sanctions would be set based on what it takes to deter criminals, accounting for how perpetrators differ in their motives and likelihood of being apprehended, with the potential to reduce unnecessary harsh penalties.

1. Tort: law and system

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Carol Brennan ◽  
Vera Bermingham
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Legal Knowledge ◽  
Related Area ◽  
System P ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Law

Without assuming prior legal knowledge, books in the Directions series introduce and guide readers through key points of law and legal debate. Questions, diagrams, and exercises help readers to engage fully with each subject and check their understanding as they progress. In civil law, tort provides remedy for a party who has suffered the breach of a protected interest. Tort law protects a wide range of interests. Currently, negligence is the greatest source of litigation with respect to tort. Torts of trespass to the person protect physical safety while trespass to property governs the ownership of property. The tort of defamation provides remedies for threats to one’s reputation. Another tort-related area deals with the protection of privacy from media intrusion. This chapter discusses the range of activity to which tort law applies and the types of harm for which it provides compensation. It also considers the main interests protected by the law of tort, how the law of tort differs from other branches of the law, and the role of policy and the human rights dimension in the law of tort.

Unenforceable Contracts and Unjusticiable Contracts: Secs. 32–33 of the Contracts (General Part) Law, 1973

1986 ◽  
Vol 21 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 425-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Shalev
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
The Future ◽  
General Part ◽  
The Law ◽  
Preparatory Work

The Contracts (General Part) Law, 1973, is the fundamental statute in Israeli contract law, and will in the future serve as the basis for the codification of Israel civil law. The Law was enacted following a decade of meticulous preparatory work by a committee headed by Professor Tedeschi. Prof. Tedeschi was the leading intellectual force in this committee; his influence is apparent in the approaches, principles and concepts of the Law, as well as in its particular provisions. Prof. Tedeschi also devoted a part of his prolific writings to the realm of contracts law. This article, dealing with only two sections of the wide-ranging Contracts (General Part) Law, is dedicated with admiration to the father of Israeli modern contract law.

In Our Image: Colonial Discourse and the Anglicization of the Law of Mandatory Palestine

1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assaf Likhovski
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Personal Injury ◽  
Colonial Discourse ◽  
Tel Aviv ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Lower Courts ◽  
The Law ◽  
Shoulder Blade

My story is full of holes. The first hole, or rather, ditch, was dug in 1930 by the municipality of Haifa. An Arab, Dr. Caesar Khoury, fell into the ditch and fractured his shoulder-blade.Could Dr. Khoury recover? The law of torts of mandatory Palestine was found in the Mejelle — an Ottoman code of Moslem civil law. Did the Mejelle provide a remedy in the case of personal injury? “Unfortunately,” said Judge Francis Baker, who delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court of Palestine, “the Mejelle dealt with liability for damages caused by animals to property, but it was ‘silent’ with regards to injuries caused to persons”. Therefore, Dr. Khoury could not recover.The second hole in my story belongs to a Jew, Feivel Danovitz. In 1939, Danovitz was run down by a truck in Tel Aviv. He sued the driver and the owner of the truck. The lower courts of Tel Aviv decided that if the Mejelle did not deal with liability for personal injury, that meant that there was a hole in the tort law of Palestine. Such a hole could be filled by recourse to the English common law in accordance with the provisions of Article 46 of the Palestine Order-in-Council, 1922. Since the English common law recognized liability for personal injury, Danovitz could recover.

scholarly journals Transfer of property based on property law rules and contract law rules under forthcoming Kosovo draft-civil code

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-165
Author(s):  
Haxhi Gashi ◽  
Bashkim Preteni
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Transfer System ◽  
Abstract System ◽  
Causal System ◽  
The Law

In most civil law jurisdictions, the contract is the most used derivative title for the transfer of ownership (movable and immovable property). Very often, the law of property and law of contract are seen as distinct and one can envisage their role from different legal perspectives. This is closely connected with the type of transfer system based on whether the (Austrian) causal system, (German) abstract system or (French) consensual system is applicable. Kosovo is in the process of civil law codification and the Kosovo Draft-Civil Code which has followed the application of the causal system of transfer of property and such an above mentioned interaction of these two branches of civil law is mandatory, and only with a common survey can the contractual transfer of property be illustrated. The aim of this paper is to focus solely on the influence of contract law rules in connection with the acquisition of ownership over movable and immovable property determined by Kosovo Draft-Civil Code.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document