The Structural Relationship Among Collaborative Self efficacy for Group Work, Task related Shared Mental Model, Team Member related Shared Mental Model, Satisfaction, and Team Performance in College Team Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-308
Author(s):  
Hanho Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Mental Model ◽  
Team Learning ◽  
Team Member ◽  
Structural Relationship ◽  
Work Task ◽  
Shared Mental Model ◽  
College Team

scholarly journals The effect of shared mental model and team dialogue on team performance

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-109
Author(s):  
Ryota Akiho ◽  
Kengo Nawata ◽  
Yoko Nakazato ◽  
Azusa Kikuchi ◽  
Kazuyo Nagaike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Mental Model ◽  
Shared Mental Model

Engaging oncologists toward integrating a shared mental model for palliative oncology within a large academic oncology practice.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Anne Margaret Walling ◽  
Christopher Pietras ◽  
Kauser Ahmed ◽  
Anne Coscarelli ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Mental Model ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Shared Mental Model ◽  
Oncology Nurse ◽  
Continuous Quality ◽  
Patient Goals ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Oncology Practice

105 Background: We aimed to engage oncologists to disseminate a successful pilot-tested shared mental model (SMM) for the integration of early advance care planning (ACP) and identification of palliative care (PC) needs across a health system’s oncologic practice. Methods: Our Oncology Communication Collaborative Team (OCCT) had oncology leadership support and included a multidisciplinary team representing leaders in oncology, ACP, PC, psycho-social oncology and quality. To communicate the SMM developed by our team, the OCCT developed an interactive Saturday session (1-hr didactic, 3-hr small group role-play) that focused on early ACP and the cognitive and emotional aspects of communication. Before and after the training, we asked participants to rate their ability to communicate with patients as well as their readiness, self-efficacy, and need for help to improve communication regarding prognosis, ACP, end of life care and symptom management using a previously validated survey. We computed means and compared matched pairs of pre and post surveys using a paired t-test. We also surveyed participants about whether they would recommend the course to others and planned changes to practice. Results: All but one oncologist (52/53), 3/4 invited fellows, and 12/14 oncology nurse practitioners participated and 90% of attendees completed pre and post surveys. Participants rated their communication ability higher (6.7 v. 7.6, p < 0.01) on a 10-point scale after the training. Readiness to improve communication in this domain (9.1 v. 9.2, p = 0.35) was similar before and after the training. Self-efficacy (1.5 v. 1.5, p = 0.70) and needing help to improve (1.6 v. 1.7, p = 0.37) were rated highly (1 = A lot and 4 = Not at all) but did not change with training. All but one participant reported they would recommend the course to others and free text responses about changes they planned to make to their practice based on the training included: having earlier ACP discussions, focusing on patient goals/priorities and asking open-ended questions. Conclusions: Conducting a training to disseminate a SMM of oncology and PC is feasible, valuable, and can be the first step for partnered continuous quality improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document