scholarly journals The Comparison of the Effect of Memory Specificity Training, Behavioral Activation Treatment, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Treatment-Resistant Depression

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Rezvan Sadr Mohammadi ◽  
Simin Gholamrezaie ◽  
Ezatelah Ghadampour ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Behavioral Activation ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Memory Specificity ◽  
Resistant Depression

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Sustain the Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Samuel T. Wilkinson ◽  
Taeho Greg Rhee ◽  
Jutta Joormann ◽  
Ryan Webler ◽  
Mayra Ortiz Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Time Interaction ◽  
Antidepressant Effects ◽  
Resistant Depression

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Ketamine has emerged as a rapid-acting antidepressant. While ongoing treatment can prevent relapse, concerns exist regarding long-term exposure. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We conducted a randomized trial to examine the feasibility and efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) following intravenous ketamine in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Subjects with TRD were recruited and treated with 6 intravenous infusions of ketamine over 3 weeks. Subjects who experienced a clinical response (≥50% improvement in depression severity) were then randomized to receiving CBT or treatment as usual (TAU) for an additional 14 weeks, using a sequential treatment model. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 42 patients who signed consent, 28 patients achieved a response and were randomized to CBT or TAU. When measured using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (primary outcome measure), the effect size at the end of the study was moderate (Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.65; 95% CI –0.55 to 1.82), though the group-by-time interaction effect was not significant. There was a significant group-by-time interaction as measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (<i>F</i> = 4.58; <i>p</i> = 0.033), favoring a greater sustained improvement in the CBT group. This corresponded to a moderate-to-large effect size of the Cohen <i>d</i> = 0.71 (95% CI –0.30 to 1.70) at the end of the study (14 weeks following the last ketamine infusion). In a subset of patients (<i>N</i> = 20) who underwent cognitive testing using the emotional N-back assessments before and after ketamine, ketamine responders showed improvement in the accuracy of emotional N-back (<i>t</i>[8] = 2.33; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.05) whereas nonresponders did not (<i>t</i>[10] &#x3c;1; <i>p</i> ns). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This proof-of-concept study provides preliminary data indicating that CBT may sustain the antidepressant effects of ketamine in TRD. Further study and optimization of this treatment approach in well-powered clinical trials is recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document