scholarly journals Identification of the Most Stable Durum Wheat Genotypes Using Nonparametric Yield Stability Statistics

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-203
Author(s):  
R. Karimizadeh ◽  
A. Asghari ◽  
O. Sofalian ◽  
K. Shahbazi Homonlo ◽  
T. Hossienpour ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmatollah KARIMIZADEH ◽  
Ali ASGHARI ◽  
Rahim CHINIPARDAZ ◽  
Omid SOFALIAN ◽  
Abdolali GHAFFARI

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (33) ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
hajar badri ◽  
Reza Mohammadi ◽  
Alireza etminan ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. De Vita ◽  
A.M. Mastrangelo ◽  
L. Matteu ◽  
E. Mazzucotelli ◽  
N. Virzì ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-201
Author(s):  
O. Bilgin ◽  
Z. Korkut

Data for grain yield of 10 durum wheat genotypes grown in 3 environments in 2 years were used to assess the effectiveness of different stability parameters and stability levels of genotypes. Although Sham I gave the highest yield over all environments, Gediz 75 was found to be the most stable genotype in this research. None of the parameters was significantly correlated with mean yield. The Sd 2, Di and ä i 2 parameters were highly correlated with Wi 2, and the CVi and Si 2 parameters with bi. The parameters evaluated in this study were separated into two groups. The orders of adaptation performances of genotypes did not vary much, and there were no significant differences within the two groups


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (23) ◽  
pp. 67-75
Author(s):  
Mahnaz Ghaedrahmati ◽  
Tahmaseb Hossein Pour ◽  
Ali Ahmadi ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-686
Author(s):  
M. Rajabi Hashjin ◽  
M.H. Fotokian ◽  
M. Agahee Sarbrzeh ◽  
M. Mohammadi ◽  
D. Talei

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nevena Djukic ◽  
Desimir Knezevic ◽  
Aleksandra Novoselskaya-Dragovich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document