scholarly journals Development Practices of Trusted AI Systems among Canadian Data Scientists

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinnie Shin ◽  
Okan Bulut ◽  
Mark J. Gierl
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
System Development ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Successful Performance ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Canadian Data ◽  
Decision Making Processes

The introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems has demonstrated impeccable potential and benefits to enhance the decision-making processes in our society. However, despite the successful performance of AI systems to date, skepticism and concern remain regarding whether AI systems could form a trusting relationship with human users. Developing trusted AI systems requires careful consideration and evaluation of its reproducibility, interpretability, and fairness, which in in turn, poses increased expectations and responsibilities for data scientists. Therefore, the current study focused on understanding Canadian data scientists’ self-confidence in creating trusted AI systems, while relying on their current AI system development practices.

Cultivating Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Digital Government

2020 ◽  
pp. 089443932098012
Author(s):  
Teresa M. Harrison ◽  
Luis Felipe Luna-Reyes
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Public Trust ◽  
Governance Structures ◽  
Cognitive Tools ◽  
Lens Model ◽  
Digital Government ◽  
Government Decision ◽  
Decision Making Processes

While there is growing consensus that the analytical and cognitive tools of artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to transform government in positive ways, it is also clear that AI challenges traditional government decision-making processes and threatens the democratic values within which they are framed. These conditions argue for conservative approaches to AI that focus on cultivating and sustaining public trust. We use the extended Brunswik lens model as a framework to illustrate the distinctions between policy analysis and decision making as we have traditionally understood and practiced them and how they are evolving in the current AI context along with the challenges this poses for the use of trustworthy AI. We offer a set of recommendations for practices, processes, and governance structures in government to provide for trust in AI and suggest lines of research that support them.

scholarly journals Statistics and Artificial Intelligence-Based Pavement Performance and Remaining Service Life Prediction Models for Flexible and Composite Pavement Systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 2674 (10) ◽  
pp. 448-460
Author(s):  
Orhan Kaya ◽  
Halil Ceylan ◽  
Sunghwan Kim ◽  
Danny Waid ◽  
Brian P. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Pavement Management ◽  
Pavement Performance ◽  
Management Decision ◽  
Performance Models ◽  
Remaining Service Life ◽  
Management Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Processes

In their pavement management decision-making processes, U.S. state highway agencies are required to develop performance-based approaches by the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal transportation legislation. One of the performance-based approaches to facilitate pavement management decision-making processes is the use of remaining service life (RSL) models. In this study, a detailed step-by-step methodology for the development of pavement performance and RSL prediction models for flexible and composite (asphalt concrete [AC] over jointed plain concrete pavement [JPCP]) pavement systems in Iowa is described. To develop such RSL models, pavement performance models based on statistics and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques were initially developed. While statistically defined pavement performance models were found to be accurate in predicting pavement performance at project level, AI-based pavement performance models were found to be successful in predicting pavement performance in network level analysis. Network level pavement performance models using both statistics and AI-based approaches were also developed to evaluate the relative success of these two models for network level pavement performance modeling. As part of this study, in the development of pavement RSL prediction models, automation tools for future pavement performance predictions were developed and used along with the threshold limits for various pavement performance indicators specified by the Federal Highway Administration. These RSL models will help engineers in decision-making processes at both network and project levels and for different types of pavement management business decisions.

scholarly journals Law and software analysis: A step closer to resolving investment disputes through artificial intelligence?

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-140
Author(s):  
Milena Galetin ◽  
Anica Milovanović
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
The Other ◽  
Judicial Discretion ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Software Analysis ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Larger Sample

Considering the possibility of using artificial intelligence in resolving legal disputes is becoming increasingly popular. The authors examine whether soft ware analysis can be applied to resolve a specific issue in investment disputes - to determine the applicable law to the substance of the dispute and highlight the application of artificial intelligence in the area of law, especially in predicting the outcome of a dispute. The starting point is a sample of 50 arbitral awards and the results of previously conducted research. It has been confirmed that soft ware analysis can be useful in decision-making processes, but not to the extent that arbitrators could exclusively rely on it. On the other hand, the development of an algorithm that would predict applicable law for different legal issues required a much larger sample. We also believe that the existence of different legal and factual circumstances in each case, as well as the personality of the arbitrator and arbitral/judicial discretion are limitations of the application of artificial intelligence in this area.

scholarly journals A Review: Artificial Intelligent Approach for Enhancing Adaptability in an Adaptive E-Learning Environment

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
M.P.L. Perera
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Neural Networks ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Artificial Intelligent ◽  
Human Decision ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Intelligent Approach ◽  
Learning Frameworks

Adaptive e-learning the aim is to fill the gap between the pupil and the educator by discussing the needs and skills of individual learners. Artificial intelligence strategies that have the potential to simulate human decision-making processes are important around adaptive e-Learning. This paper explores the Artificial techniques; Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Bayesian Networks and Genetic Algorithms, highlighting their contributions to the notion of the adaptability in the sense of Adaptive E-learning. The implementation of Artificial Neural Networks to resolve problems in the current Adaptive e-learning frameworks have been established.

scholarly journals Towards Trust, Transparency and Liability in AI / AS systems

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Thelisson
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Autonomous Systems ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Collective Decision ◽  
Collective Decision Making ◽  
Global Level ◽  
Governance Mechanisms ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Artificial Intelligence Systems

The research problem being investigated in this article is how to develop governance mechanisms and collective decision-making processes at a global level for Artificial Intelligence systems (AI) and Autonomous systems (AS), which would enhance confidence in AI and AS.

scholarly journals Review of Artificial Intelligence Applied in Decision-Making Processes in Agricultural Public Policy

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1374
Author(s):  
Juan M. Sánchez ◽  
Juan P. Rodríguez ◽  
Helbert E. Espitia
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Public Policy ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Public Policies ◽  
Search Process ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
The World ◽  
Decision Making Processes

The objective of this article is to review how Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools have helped the process of formulating agricultural public policies in the world. For this, a search process was carried out in the main scientific repositories finding different publications. The findings have shown that, first, the most commonly used AI tools are agent-based models, cellular automata, and genetic algorithms. Secondly, they have been utilized to determine land and water use, and agricultural production. In the end, the large usefulness that AI tools have in the process of formulating agricultural public policies is concluded.

scholarly journals Initial evidence for biased decision-making despite human-centered AI explanations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Scharowski ◽  
Florian Brühlmann
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cognitive Biases ◽  
Ongoing Debate ◽  
Explainable Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Financial Decision ◽  
Biases And Heuristics ◽  
User Trust ◽  
Initial Price

In explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) research, explainability is widely regarded as crucial for user trust in artificial intelligence (AI). However, empirical investigations of this assumption are still lacking. There are several proposals as to how explainability might be achieved and it is an ongoing debate what ramifications explanations actually have on humans. In our work-in-progress we explored two posthoc explanation approaches presented in natural language as a means for explainable AI. We examined the effects of human-centered explanations on trust behavior in a financial decision-making experiment (N = 387), captured by weight of advice (WOA). Results showed that AI explanations lead to higher trust behavior if participants were advised to decrease an initial price estimate. However, explanations had no effect if the AI recommended to increase the initial price estimate. We argue that these differences in trust behavior may be caused by cognitive biases and heuristics that people retain in their decision-making processes involving AI. So far, XAI has primarily focused on biased data and prejudice due to incorrect assumptions in the machine learning process. The implications of potential biases and heuristics that humans exhibit when being presented an explanation by AI have received little attention in the current XAI debate. Both researchers and practitioners need to be aware of such human biases and heuristics in order to develop truly human-centered AI.

scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence and Police Decision Making Processes

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-75
Author(s):  
Adam Palmer
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Police Department ◽  
Business Analytics ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Geospatial Technologies ◽  
Mental Health Issues ◽  
Police Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Processes

On November 26, 2020, Chief Constable Adam Palmer of the Vancouver Police Department (VPD) presented Artificial Intelligence and Police Decision Making Processes at the 2020 CASIS West Coast Security Conference. The presentation was followed by a group panel for questions & answers. Main discussion topics included the integration of data and information sharing systems between BC policing services at all levels, the integration of geospatial technologies into policing in BC, the benefits of introducing better business analytics into policing, and better policing for situations involving mental health issues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document