scholarly journals An electronic audit tool to track the donning and doffing practices of personal protective equipment in the emergency department

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-12
Author(s):  
Ramya Sridhar ◽  
Jennifer Woods ◽  
Maya Jusza ◽  
Sharon Drury
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Audit Tool ◽  
University Of Alberta ◽  
The University

An electronic audit tool to track the donning and doffing practices of personal protective equipment in the emergency department Maya Jusza, Ramya Sridhar, Jennifer Woods, Sharon Drury Background: Maintaining the safety of patients and healthcare professionals is a priority in all healthcare settings. Infection prevention measures such as donning and doffing practices of personal protective equipment (PPE) have become even more imperative in light of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Potential PPE breaches and the degree of frontline compliance are currently being analyzed through the use of paper PPE audit tools which can be laborious and time-consuming. The development of an electronic alternative would improve frontline safety and enhance the efficiency of data collection, while optimizing the ability to share these observations with the frontline team in real time. Two nursing leadership students from the University of Alberta were tasked with developing an electronic PPE audit tool prototype for the University of Alberta Hospital’s emergency department. Implementation: An electronic PPE audit tool prototype was developed using Google Forms which provided a user-friendly interface. Google applications were used as no confidential or patient data was collected during PPE audits. The prototype auto-populated the data entries into linked spreadsheets and interactive data dashboards that visualized the data using graphs in real time. This enabled users to easily identify trends and direct educational interventions as required. Instructional one pagers and screencast videos were also created to accompany the prototype. The prototype was reviewed by and received extensive support from: Unit Managers, Patient Care Managers, Process Improvement Nurses, Infection Prevention Control (IPC), the Executive Director of the University of Alberta Hospital and Stollery emergency department and Edmonton Zone medicine programs, and the University of Alberta Hospital and Mazankowski Executive Leadership Team. Several changes and improvements were made using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. This prototype has currently been replicated onto an Alberta Health Services (AHS) server and has completed the formal testing phase with a planned application launch date. Evaluation Methods: Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were used to guide the implementation of this audit tool prototype. After development, the prototype was tested and revised which included six rounds of audit trials at the University of Alberta Hospital’s emergency department and on some inpatient medicine units. This prototype was consistently evaluated at various stages of development and changes were made to include feedback. After approval was received to recreate this prototype onto an AHS compatible server, additional changes were made to ensure functionality. These changes included adding designations and simplifying certain questions. IPC was consulted to ensure the steps outlined for donning and doffing in the prototype were accurate and reflected requirements in the clinical environment. Results: This audit tool prototype has gathered tremendous support through various demonstrations of its ability to streamline data collection in the healthcare setting. This data is relevant to the safety of both frontline workers and patients as it identifies inconsistencies in donning and doffing practices. In addition, the prototype also complements the Edmonton zone-wide PPE coaching initiative by allowing for a quantitative measurement of its efficacy. This has prompted the fast-tracked replication of an AHS compatible version with the assistance of a dedicated team that includes the creators of the prototype tool, IPC, Quality Assurance, Information Technology, and Clinical Services Development. This version has a scheduled launch date on March 22, 2021 and is to be initially rolled out to University of Alberta’s emergency department and medicine units. The objective is to eventually make this the standardized PPE audit tool throughout Alberta. Advice and Lessons Learned: 1) In order to be sustainable and implemented site-wide, an AHS compatible tool isrequired. The use of Google applications is not preferred as data will be stored outside ofthe AHS server. Even though there is no confidential information, wide-spread use mayoverwhelm the Google platform and a Gmail account is required to view data. An in-house AHS alternative has been developed. 2) Several discussions took place regarding discretions on what steps can be auditedaccording to IPC protocols. For example, some clinical nurse educators prefer handhygiene to be completed between donning steps, while this is not mandatory or auditableaccording to IPC. In addition, several discussions took place to identify the operationaland business owners of this tool which are required to support the AHS compatibleversion of the application. 3) PPE audits are vital across all hospital departments to improve the quality of healthcare.The use of PPE during patient care has grown exponentially due to the SARS-CoV2pandemic and has amplified the need for an electronic alternative to the existing paperPPE audit tool. The electronic audit tool offers an innovative way to accurately andefficiently collect and display data which will promote an improved quality of care.

scholarly journals Percepção do enfermeiro acerca do uso de equipamentos de proteção individual em hospital paraibano

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 01
Author(s):  
Allan Dillammary Araújo Barbosa ◽  
Allan Martins Ferreira ◽  
Edmara da Nóbrega Xavier Martins ◽  
Anne Milane Formiga Bezerra ◽  
Juliana de Almeida Leandro Bezerra
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Regional Hospital ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Personal Protection ◽  
Work Activities

<p>Biossegurança ou segurança biológica é um conjunto de ações voltadas à prevenção e proteção do trabalhador. Uma estratégia utilizada como forma de evitar contaminação no ambiente de trabalho se dar a partir do uso de Equipamentos de Proteção Individual (EPIs). Objetivou-se analisar a percepção do enfermeiro sobre o uso e importância do EPI diante da assistência aos pacientes. O trabalho trata-se de um estudo do tipo exploratório-descritivo, com abordagem quantiqualitativa, foi realizado com enfermeiros plantonistas do setor de urgência e emergência de um Hospital Regional paraibano. Conforme os dados observa-se que a maioria dos enfermeiros é do gênero feminino, com faixa etária entre 20 e 30 anos de idade, são especialistas e atuam há dois anos no serviço de emergência. Todos os enfermeiros mostraram conhecimento sobre a importância do uso do EPI, relatando as principais doenças que podem acometê-los caso ocorram episódios de contaminação durante a execução das suas atividades laborais. Alguns dos profissionais afirmaram já se contaminar, sendo o material perfurocortante o que mais causou acidentes. Afirmaram que a instituição oferece a maioria dos EPIs necessários para proteção individual, porém só em algumas circunstâncias fazem uso desses equipamentos. Portanto, pôde-se concluir que tais contaminações poderiam ser evitadas se todos os profissionais fizerem uso dos EPIs em todas as situações que envolvam riscos, pondo em prática o conhecimento relatado, conferindo proteção não só ao profissional como a clientela que procura o serviço.</p><p><strong><em>Nurses perception about the use of personal protective equipment in a hospital in parabian</em></strong></p><p>Abstract: Biosafety or security biological is a set of actions aimed at the prevention and protection of the worker. One strategy used in order to avoid contamination in the work environment it's given from the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The work it is a study of exploratory-descriptive, with a quantiqualitative approach, was conducted with nurses in the sector of urgency and emergency in a Regional Hospital Paraiba, aiming analysis on the use and importance of PPE when providing patient care.  According to data was realized that most nurses are female, aged between 20 and 30 years old, are experts and acting for two years in the emergency department. All nurses showed knowledge about the importance of using PPE, reporting major diseases that can affect them in case occur contamination episodes during the execution of their work activities. Some professionals said they already been contaminated, being the material pierce cutter which caused more accidents. They stated that the institution offers the majority of PPEs required for personal protection, but only in some circumstances they make use of such equipment. Therefore, it was concluded that such contamination could be avoided if all professionals make use of PPE in all situations involving risk, putting into practice the knowledge reported, providing protection not only to the professional as customers seeking service.</p>

scholarly journals P120: Characteristics and outcomes of patients with neurologic complaints who have an unscheduled return visit to the emergency department within 72 hours

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S107
Author(s):  
A. Schouten ◽  
A. Gauri ◽  
M. Bullard
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
University Of Alberta ◽  
Return Visit ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Return Visits ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
The University

Introduction: Patients with neurologic presenting complaints comprised 12.5% of total University of Alberta Emergency Department (ED) visits in 2017. This group of patients has high rates of EMS utilization, admission, and ED resources including diagnostic imaging and consult services. We sought to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of the patients with neurologic complaints who have an unscheduled return visit (URV) to the ED within 72 hours to identify opportunities for improvement in quality and safety of patient care. Methods: Data was extracted from the Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) and National Ambulatory Care System databases to select adult patients presenting to the University of Alberta hospital in 2017 with neurologic complaints as defined by the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). We additionally selected for return visits to Edmonton Zone EDs within 72 hours. Using standard descriptive statistics, we examined demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with 72-hour URV. Results: Of 8,770 total visits, 674 (7.69%) had a 72-hour URV to an Edmonton zone ED. The URV rate was 9.0% in patients seen by a physician and discharged with approval and 23.4-33.3% in patients who left against medical advice (LAMA), prior to completion of treatment (LPCT), or without being seen by a physician (LWBS). The mean age of URV patients was 45.6 years, 56.5% were male, with a mean ED length of stay of 7.37 hours. The top 5 diagnoses for URV patients were headache, migraine, alcohol related disorders, concussion, and transient ischemic attack. 14.7% of URV patients were admitted, 13.5% LWBS, 1.6% LAMA, 1.6% LPCT, and 66.1% were discharged. Conclusion: The majority of neurologic complaint patients with URV within 72 hours are those who LAMA, LPTC, or LWBS at index visit. The admission rate for URV patients (14.7%) is lower than for the index ED visit (55%), however these patients have high LWBS rates. Identifying strategies to limit the LWBS rate for these patients would reduce return visits and improve the quality and safety of patient care.

scholarly journals Knowledge of the nursing team in the main types of hospital infections

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 4946
Author(s):  
José Ramos Batista ◽  
Kamila Nethielly Souza Leite ◽  
Silvia Ximenes Oliveira ◽  
Raquel Campos de Medeiros ◽  
Talita Araújo de Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Hospital Infection ◽  
Hand Washing ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Hospital Infections ◽  
Nursing Team ◽  
Individual Protection

RESUMOObjetivo: identificar o conhecimento da equipe de enfermagem perante as infecções hospitalares. Método: estudo quantitativo, exploratório-descritivo, com 30 técnicos de enfermagem e 10 enfermeiros. O instrumento utilizado para coleta de dados foi um questionário, analisado estatisticamente. Os resultados foram expressos em tabelas. Resultados: 100% dos enfermeiros e 96,7% dos técnicos de enfermagem têm conhecimento sobre a infecção hospitalar; 80% dos enfermeiros e 70% dos técnicos de enfermagem usam o EPI (Equipamento de Proteção Individual) corretamente. Conclusão: a maior porção da equipe de enfermagem compreende os riscos perante as infecções hospitalares; a enfermagem apresenta grande importância para redução dos níveis de infecções nos hospitais. Descritores: Infecção Hospitalar; Enfermagem; Equipamento de Proteção Individual; Técnica de Lavagem de Mãos; Prevenção de Infecção Hospitalar; Centro Cirúrgico.ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the knowledge of the nursing team regarding hospital infections. Method: this is a quantitative, exploratory-descriptive study, with 30 nursing technicians and 10 nurses. The instrument used for data collection was a questionnaire analyzed statistically. The results were expressed in tables. Results: 100% of nurses and 96.7% of nursing technicians know about hospital infection; 80% of nurses and 70% of nursing technicians use PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) correctly. Conclusion: most of the nursing team understand the risks related to hospital infections; nursing is very important for reducing the levels of infections in hospitals. Descriptors: Hospital Infection; Nursing; Individual Protection Equipment; Hand Washing Technique; Hospital Infection Prevention; Surgery Center.RESUMEN Objetivo: identificar el conocimiento del equipo de enfermería frente a las infecciones hospitalares. Método: estudio cuantitativo, exploratorio-descriptivo, con 30 técnicos de enfermería y 10 enfermeros. El instrumento utilizado para recolección de datos fue um cuestionario, analizado estadísticamente. Los resultados fueron expresos en tablas. Resultados: 100% de los enfermeros y 96,7% de los técnicos de enfermería tienen conocimiento sobre la infección hospitalaria; 80% de los enfermeros y 70% de los técnicos de enfermería usan el EPI (Equipamiento de Protección Individual) correctamente. Conclusión: la mayor parte del equipo de enfermería comprende los riesgos frente a las infecciones hospitalarias; la enfermería presenta grande importancia para reducción de los niveles de infecciones en los hospitales. Descriptores: Infección Hospitalaria; Enfermería; Equipo de Protección Individual; Técnica de Lavado de Manos; Prevención de Infección Hospitalaria; Centro Cirúrgico.

scholarly journals Infection control practices and challenges in Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
pp. 175717742110127
Author(s):  
Salma Abbas ◽  
Faisal Sultan
Keyword(s):  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Hospital Staff ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
And Control

Background: Patient and staff safety at healthcare facilities during outbreaks hinges on a prompt infection prevention and control response. Physicians leading these programmes have encountered numerous obstacles during the pandemic. Aim/objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate infection prevention and control practices and explore the challenges in Pakistan during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and administered a survey to physicians leading infection prevention and control programmes at 18 hospitals in Pakistan. Results: All participants implemented universal masking, limited the intake of patients and designated separate triage areas, wards and intensive care units for coronavirus disease 2019 patients at their hospitals. Eleven (61%) physicians reported personal protective equipment shortages. Staff at three (17%) hospitals worked without the appropriate personal protective equipment due to limited supplies. All participants felt overworked and 17 (94%) reported stress. Physicians identified the lack of negative pressure rooms, fear and anxiety among hospital staff, rapidly evolving guidelines, personal protective equipment shortages and opposition from hospital staff regarding the choice of recommended personal protective equipment as major challenges during the pandemic. Discussion: The results of this study highlight the challenges faced by physicians leading infection prevention and control programmes in Pakistan. It is essential to support infection prevention and control personnel and bridge the identified gaps to ensure patient and staff safety at healthcare facilities.

scholarly journals Rapid implementation of Inpatient eConsult Programme addresses new challenges for patient care during COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjinnov-2020-000557
Author(s):  
Sharon Rikin ◽  
Eric J Epstein ◽  
Inessa Gendlina
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Qualitative Feedback ◽  
The Usa ◽  
New Challenges ◽  
Science Framework ◽  
Context Specific

IntroductionAt the early epicentre of the COVID-19 crisis in the USA, our institution saw a surge in the demand for inpatient consultations for areas impacted by COVID-19 (eg, infectious diseases, nephrology, palliative care) and shortages in personal protective equipment (PPE). We aimed to provide timely specialist input for consult requests during the COVID-19 pandemic by implementing an Inpatient eConsult Programme.MethodsWe used the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance implementation science framework and run chart analysis to evaluate the reach, adoption and maintenance of the Inpatient eConsult Programme compared with traditional in-person consults. We solicited qualitative feedback from frontline physicians and specialists for programme improvements.ResultsDuring the study period, there were 46 available in-person consult orders and 21 new eConsult orders. At the peak of utilisation, 42% of all consult requests were eConsults, and by the end of the study period, utilisation fell to 20%. Qualitative feedback revealed subspecialties best suited for eConsults (infectious diseases, nephrology, haematology, endocrinology) and influenced improvements to the ordering workflow, documentation, billing and education regarding use.DiscussionWhen offered inpatient eConsult requests as an alternative to in-person consults in the context of a surge in patients with COVID-19, frontline physicians used eConsult requests and decreased use of in-person consults. As the demand for consults decreased and PPE shortages were no longer a major concern, eConsult utilisation decreased, revealing a preference for in-person consultations when possible.ConclusionsLessons learnt can be used to develop and implement inpatient eConsults to meet context-specific challenges at other institutions.

scholarly journals Implementing a Massive Personal Protective Equipment Education—A Multidisciplinary Team Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s280-s281
Author(s):  
Mayar Al Mohajer ◽  
Megan Fischer ◽  
Melissa Rouse ◽  
Takei Pipkins ◽  
John Byrne
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Just In Time ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Online Video ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team Approach

Background: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is defined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration as specialized clothing or equipment worn by an employee for protection against infectious materials. They include gloves, gowns, masks, respirators, googles and face shields. The CDC has issued guidelines on appropriateness of when, what, and how to use PPE. Despite these guidelines, compliance with PPE remains challenging. Methods: We implemented a massive hospital-wide rapid education program on PPE donning and doffing of all employees and staff. This program included an online video, return demonstration and just-in-time training. To develop the program, we recorded PPE training video, reviewed PPE validation checklist, developed new isolation precaution signage with quick response (QR) code to video, developed a nutrition tray removal video and a equipment cleaning video, developed family and visitor guidelines for isolation precautions, and created an audit tool for PPE donning and doffing practices. The program required interdisciplinary collaboration including administration, infection prevention, nursing education, central supply, environmental services, facility maintenance, and security. Results: The first phase of the program was implemented through 30 separate 4-hour PPE skills fair offered over 48 hours. In total, 500 staff members were trained in the first 48 hours; 6 additional 3-hour sessions were provided on site in the following 3 month. Additionally, training was provided in off-site clinics, physician leadership meetings, new-hire orientation for nursing staff, and monthly resident and fellow training through graduate medical education. As needed, training was provided by infection prevention, nursing education, and floor nurses. In total, 5,237 staff members were trained within 3 months after implementation. Actual audit results (50 audits per week) showed improved and sustained compliance to >94%. Conclusions: A massive hospital-wide educational program including online video, return demonstration, and just-in-time training is a feasible and very effective method to improve compliance with PPE donning and doffing. A multidisciplinary team approach, administration support, and continuous education and audits are key factors in successful implementation.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Safe On-Boat Resuscitation by Lifeguards in COVID-19 Era: A Pilot Study Comparing Three Sets of Personal Protective Equipment

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Roberto Barcala-Furelos ◽  
Cristian Abelairas-Gómez ◽  
Alejandra Alonso-Calvete ◽  
Francisco Cano-Noguera ◽  
Aida Carballo-Fazanes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Preparation Time

Abstract Introduction: On-boat resuscitation can be applied by lifeguards in an inflatable rescue boat (IRB). Due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and recommendations for the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), prehospital care procedures need to be re-evaluated. The objective of this study was to determine how the use of PPE influences the amount of preparation time needed before beginning actual resuscitation and the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; QCPR) on an IRB. Methods: Three CPR tests were performed by 14 lifeguards, in teams of two, wearing different PPE: (1) Basic PPE (B-PPE): gloves, a mask, and protective glasses; (2) Full PPE (F-PPE): B-PPE + a waterproof apron; and (3) Basic PPE + plastic blanket (B+PPE). On-boat resuscitation using a bag-valve-mask (BVM) and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter was performed sailing at 20km/hour. Results: Using B-PPE takes less time and is significantly faster than F-PPE (B-PPE 17 [SD = 2] seconds versus F-PPE 69 [SD = 17] seconds; P = .001), and the use of B+PPE is slightly higher (B-PPE 17 [SD = 2] seconds versus B+PPE 34 [SD = 6] seconds; P = .002). The QCPR remained similar in all three scenarios (P >.05), reaching values over 79%. Conclusion: The use of PPE during on-board resuscitation is feasible and does not interfere with quality when performed by trained lifeguards. The use of a plastic blanket could be a quick and easy alternative to offer extra protection to lifeguards during CPR on an IRB.

scholarly journals COVID – 19 related knowledge and preventive practices early in the outbreak among health care workers in selected public health facilities of Illu aba Bor and Buno Bedelle zones, Southwest Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dereje Tsegaye ◽  
Muluneh Shuremu ◽  
Dereje Oljira ◽  
Sileshi Dubale ◽  
Getachew Befekadu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Southwest Ethiopia ◽  
Preventive Practices ◽  
Care Workers

Abstract Background Novel-coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease is currently a worldwide health risk and public health emergency concern. The virus is transmitted from an infected person to another person through close contact and droplets. Frontline health care workers are the most at risk of infection, and so a WHO interim guidance document was issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) which underscores the importance of proper sanitation and waste management practices for COVID- 19 in health-care settings. This study aimed at assessing knowledge and preventive practices towards Covid-19 among health care providers in selected health facilities of Illu Aba Bor and Buno Bedele zones, Southwest Ethiopia. Methods An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2020 among 330 health workers in selected health facilities of Illu Aba Bor and Buno-Bedelle Zones, Southwest Ethiopia. Data were collected using a self-administered structured questionnaire. The collected data were entered into Epidata version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 23 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of preventive practices towards Covid-19. Statistical significance was declared at a p-value of < 0.05. Result The majority of respondents (93.3%) demonstrated good knowledge of COVID-19, and the mean (SD) knowledge score was 9.04 ± 1.06. Nearly two-thirds (64.2%) of the study participants had good infection prevention practices. Being male (AOR = 3.65, 95% CI: (1.96, 6.80)), education level (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI (1.02, 3.22)), profession (AOR = 3.17, 95% CI (1.08, 9.33)), service year (5–10 years) (AOR = 2.00 (1.02, 3.92)) and more than 10 years (AOR = 3.14 (1.51, 6.52)), availability of personal protective equipment (AOR = 1.96 (1.06, 3.61)) and Knowledge level (AOR = 2.61 (1.48, 4.62)) were independent predictors of COVID-19 preventive practices. Conclusion The overall level of knowledge of HCWs was good. However, the practice was relatively low. Gender, educational status, profession, year of service, knowledge towards COVID-19, and availability of personal protective equipment were independent predictors of good infection prevention practices. Optimizing the infection prevention and control loop of the health facilities is recommended.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevention strategies including pre-endoscopic virus testing and use of high risk personal protective equipment

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alanna Ebigbo ◽  
Christoph Römmele ◽  
Christina Bartenschlager ◽  
Selin Temizel ◽  
Elisabeth Kling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Prevalence Rates ◽  
Prevention Strategies ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients

Abstract Background Infection prevention strategies to protect healthcare workers in endoscopy units during the post-peak phase of the COVID-19 pandemic are currently under intense discussion. In this paper, the cost-effectiveness of routine pre-endoscopy testing and high risk personal protective equipment (PPE) is addressed. Method A model based on theoretical assumptions of 10 000 asymptomatic patients presenting to a high volume center was created. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and absolute costs per endoscopy were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. Results ICER values for universal testing decreased with increasing prevalence rates. For higher prevalence rates (≥ 1 %), ICER values were lowest for routine pre-endoscopy testing coupled with use of high risk PPE, while cost per endoscopy was lowest for routine use of high risk PPE without universal testing. Conclusion In general, routine pre-endoscopy testing combined with high risk PPE becomes more cost-effective with rising prevalence rates of COVID-19.

scholarly journals Implementation of a Quality Improvement Role for Unlicensed Assistive Personnel and Effects on Infection Prevention

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s73-s74
Author(s):  
Natalie Schnell ◽  
Lauren DiBiase ◽  
Amy Selimos ◽  
Lisa Stancill ◽  
Shelley Summerlin-Long ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Process Measure

Background: Care bundles comprise evidence-based practices and interventions that are easily and consistently implemented while improving patient outcomes. As patient acuity and task overload continue to increase, infection prevention bundle and process measure compliance and data collection may become a lower priority for registered nurses (RNs). In early 2019, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) began full-time quality liaison work on a 53-bed inpatient adult oncology unit at UNC Medical Center to provide targeted compliance data collection and to correct deficits in real time when possible and within the appropriate scope of practice. Methods: The quality liaison CNA is highly motivated, with a relevant clinical background and effective communication skills. After conducting a gap analysis, the unit developed specific responsibilities for several areas of quality improvement, including infection prevention. In addition to rounding on all patients daily, the quality liaison (1) performs direct patient care tasks like Foley catheter care, (2) conducts patient education on topics such as chlorhexidine gluconate treatments, (3) performs all relevant process measure audits, and (4) easily relays missed or needed care to RNs with a door sign created as part of this initiative. High-risk findings, such as a loose central-line dressing, prompt immediate communication to the RN, with follow-up and escalation when necessary. Results: Patients and staff received the quality liaison well, and the increased attention to care bundle components and auditing ensured consistent, evidence-based care along with accurate and reliable data collection. Compared to the previous calendar year, the number of central-line audits on the unit increased by >1,400 by the end of 2019. Patient outcomes improved, and during 1 fiscal year, the unit achieved rate reductions between 40% and 55% for central-line–associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, and healthcare-associated C. difficile infections. Staffing and logistical challenges imposed by the COVID-19 global pandemic have hampered this work because the quality liaison was redeployed to direct patient care intermittently. Correspondingly, from July to October 2020, the same infection rates increased between 30% and 353%. Conclusions: Having a designated quality liaison is an effective means to achieving quality improvements while remaining an integral member of the patient care team. As staffing has improved on this unit, the quality liaison has refocused efforts, and infection rates are beginning to improve. Given the success of the quality liaison role in improving quality outcomes on this unit, the hospital is exploring expansion of this model to additional units.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document