scholarly journals Recent Regulatory and Legislative Developments of Interest to Oil and Gas Lawyers

2010 ◽  
pp. 529-606
Author(s):  
Michael W. McCachen ◽  
Karen McGlone ◽  
Carol Hales ◽  
Lars Olthafer ◽  
Douglas Crowther

This article identifies recent regulatory and legislative developments of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The authors survey a variety of subject areas, examining key decisions of courts, the National Energy Board, the Alberta Resources Conservation Board, the Alberta Surface Rights Board, and the Alberta Utilities Commission. In addition, the authors review a variety of key policy and legislative changes from the federal and provincial levels.

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 417
Author(s):  
L.E. Smith ◽  
Marie H. Buchinski ◽  
And Deirdre A. Sheehan

This article identifies recent regulatory and legislative developments of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The authors survey a variety of subject areas, examining decisions of key regulatory agencies such as the National Energy Board, the Ontario Energy Board, the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board, the Alberta Surface Rights Board, and the Alberta Utilities Commission, as well as related court decisions. In addition, the authors review a variety of key policy and legislative changes from the federal and provincial levels.


2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Alicia Quesnel ◽  
Aaron Rogers

This article provides an assessment of how the findings of the Alberta Court of Appeal in OMERS Energy v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board) compare and conflict with the approach historically taken by Canadian courts addressing the capability of a well and related issues. The authors then provide an analysis of uncertainties created by the findings of the Court and discuss the implications of the decision for the upstream oil and gas industry. 


2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Luigi A. Cusano ◽  
David M. Wood

In this article the authors highlight regulatory and legislative developments during the period of May 2000 through April 2001 that are of particular interest to oil and gas lawyers. Decisions of the National Energy Board and the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board are the primary focus for regulatory developments. Key policy developments, guidelines and directives of the AEUB, the Canadian-Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Board and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board are also examined. With respect to legislative developments, particular emphasis is placed on Alberta and federal legislative developments, although notable developments in other jurisdictions are also highlighted.


2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Pelto ◽  
Peeter Vahtra ◽  
Kari Liuhto

This paper deals with Russian investments to ten Eastern European EU candidate countries. Eastern European countries are an important destination for Russian OFDI, and the share of Russia in many CEEC's inward FDI stock is substantial. Russian investments to these countries are mostly connected to the internationalisation of Russian energy sector. Russian oil and gas giants have been actively investing to almost all eastern EU candidate countries. However, OFDI constitutes only a small part of Russian capital abroad, as it covers merely 10 % of the Russian capital flight. Cyprus has been an important landing place for Russian capital flight and is currently the biggest direct investor to Russian economy. Also the investment flow from (or via) Cyprus to other Eastern European countries is relatively big. Significant share of these Cypriot investments are considered to be of Russian origin. This paper tries to anticipate the effects of the legislative changes, due to Cyprus's EU accession in 2004, on the role of Cypriot offshore sector as a landing place for Russian capital.


10.18060/1962 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Footen Bromfield ◽  
Moshoula Capous-Desyllas

In response to the overwhelming amount of attention to human trafficking, the debates surrounding its definition, and its focus on the sex industry, the purpose of this study was to understand the motivations behind the formation of the Trafficking in Victims Protection Act (TVPA). Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) as a model, data was collected and analyzed in order to examine the coalition identities of key players and their positions. Through the presentation of in-depth interview data with key policy players involved in the making of the TVPA, this article illustrates how and why the TVPA was formulated, the implications of its development, and the necessity for critical analysis of its effects. The use of alternative frameworks of labor and migration for understanding trafficking is proposed. Further consideration is given to legislative changes to eliminate anti-prostitution ideology and to support anti-oppressive approaches to addressing forced or deceptive working conditions.


1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 484
Author(s):  
Alan S. Hollingworth ◽  
David M. Wood

This article reviews numerous recent decisions of the National Energy Board, the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, the British Columbia Utilities Commission and the Manitoba Public Utilities Board pertaining to oil and gas issues. In addition, changes in the national and provincial statutory frameworks governing the oil and gas industry are explored. While the emphasis throughout the article is placed on developments federally and in Alberta, significant decisions and legislative changes in other jurisdictions within Canada are also highlighted.


2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 521
Author(s):  
John E. Lowe ◽  
Jonathan M. Liteplo

This article highlights regulatory and legislative developments during the period of May 2007 through April 2008 that are of interest to oil and gas lawyers. The article primarily examines decisions and other related jurisprudence of the National Energy Board and the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, the latter of which was split into the Energy Resources Conservation Board and the Alberta Utilities Commission on 1 January 2008. Additionally, the article details policy and legislative developments affecting the National Energy Board and the two new Alberta regulators. Regulatory developments at the Alberta Surface Rights Board and in other jurisdictions are also considered.


Author(s):  
Gleb Panfilov ◽  
Yui Gao

The subject of this research consists in the analysis of the experience of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on reform of the system of taxation of oil and natural gas extraction, which can present significant interest for Russian executive branch and researchers in the conditions of reform of Russian natural resource legislation, as well as introduction of the excess profit tax (Article 25.4 of the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation). Moreover, this is the first Russian-language writer article on exploring the content of the new PRC law “On Resource Tax”, which will be enacted from September 1, 2020. Based on the works of Russian, American, and Chinese scholars alongside Russia’s and China’s legislations, the article employs the method of synchronized and diachronic (historical) comparison and general scientific methods (formal-logical, analysis, synthesis) for determining peculiarities of China’s approach towards execution of legal reforms. The following specificities of China’s legal reforms were determined: preliminary formulation of goals of the legislative changes at the highest levels of state government, testing of the legislative changes in the territories of separate provinces, priority of goals of national development over budget revenue, adaptation of traditions of China’s legal technique to the requirements of foreign investors. The conclusions made in this research can be of interest for lawmakers, as well as all parties interested in comparative legal studies.  


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
David J. Farmer ◽  
Layne N. Thiessen

This article highlights important legislative and regulatory developments of relevance to energy lawyers, including those involving electricity matters and related jurisprudence that arose between May 2012 and May 2013. The authors have reviewed a wide variety of subject areas, including examining decisions of key regulatory agencies such as the National Energy Board, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Alberta’s Energy Resources Conservation Board, the Alberta Utilities Commission, the Alberta Surface Rights Board, the Ontario Energy Board, the Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal, and the World Trade Organization. Additionally, federal and provincial legislation and regulations of significance introduced during this period are canvassed.


1981 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Robert M. Perrin

Decisions of the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board arising over the past year are reviewed, along with new legislation in British Co lumbia and related decisions of the B.C. Energy Commission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document