scholarly journals The United Kingdom Parliament and the British North America Acts

1969 ◽  
pp. 352
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Marshall
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
British North America ◽  
The United Kingdom

This is the text of a presentation to the Kershaw Committee in the United Kingdom in 1980, and deals with the existence of a convention in respect to amendment of the BUA. Act and with the options available to the United Kingdom Parliament in dealing with the Canadian Resolution.

The Amending Power of the Canadian Parliament

1951 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Livingston
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
British North America ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Considerable Controversy

The enactment by the Imperial Parliament at Westminster of the British North America (No. 2) Act, 1949, raises again the complex and difficult problem of the nature of the amending process in the eldest of the British dominions. From the beginning this process has been surrounded with a certain mysterious imprecision, deriving from the fact that Canada's basic constitutional statute—the British North America Act, 1867—contained no provision for its own amendment. In other words, until 1949 there was no clause in the constitution setting out a procedure whereby its own provisions might be legally changed. Hence through the long years all amendments have had to be made by the Parliament at Westminster which enacted the original statute—a necessity that has produced all sorts of difficult problems for students of constitutional law in both Canada and the United Kingdom. It has long been settled practice that the Imperial Parliament will enact whatever amendments are requested by the appropriate authorities in Canada, but a question remains as to which are the appropriate authorities. It seems now to be settled, after considerable controversy, that the executive government, acting alone, may not make such a request; practice requires a joint address by the two houses of Parliament. But is it necessary for the Dominion authorities to consult with the provinces before going to London with this request or may the Dominion do this by itself? If consultation is conceived to be necessary, must all the provinces be consulted? And if so, is it necessary that they all consent to the amendment before it is requested? If all need not consent, what part is necessary? These questions and other similar ones have plagued Canadians for years, and there is not yet any accepted solution either in precedent or in law.

Part I Constitutional History, D The British Constitutional Tradition, Ch.5 The British Legal Tradition in Canadian Constitutional Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walters Mark D
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Constitutional History ◽  
Legal Tradition ◽  
Independent State ◽  
British North America ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Constitutional Tradition ◽  
Structure And Design

This chapter examines the influence of the British legal tradition within Canadian constitutional law. The foundational text of Canada’s constitution, the British North America Act, 1867, was adopted when Canada was still a UK colony, and so it is hardly surprising that this influence would prove to be important—even after Canada emerged as an independent state. Still, the assertion in the preamble to the 1867 Act, that Canada’s constitution is ‘similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom’, must be approached cautiously. The leading British constitutional scholar A.V. Dicey went so far as to describe this assertion as a piece of ‘official mendacity’. The analysis in Section 2 of this chapter focuses upon institutional structure and design. Here, it will be seen that Dicey was wrong. The analysis in Section 3 of the chapter is on the interpretive ethic or what Dicey called the ‘spirit’ of the constitution.

The Dominions and the United Kingdom

1931 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-173
Author(s):  
G. Godfrey Phillips
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
Great Difficulty ◽  
The Political ◽  
British North America ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Relationship

The relationship between the Dominions and the Crown and the Imperial Parliament presents questions of great difficulty. At the present time the Dominions are, just as the Colonies, subject to the legal—though not to the political—supremacy of the Imperial Parliament, the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Though this supremacy has for many years not been exercised positively, i.e. by the passing of Acts affecting a Dominion, except at the request of such Dominion, e.g. at the request of Canada to amend the British North America Act, 1867, yet it still exists, inasmuch as there are in force Acts of the Imperial Parliament (especially the Acts creating the Dominion Constitutions) which apply to the Dominions, and the courts would be compelled to hold any Dominion legislation conflicting with such Acts to be inoperative.

Who Publishes Where? Exploring the Geographic Diversity of Global IR Journals

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathis Lohaus ◽  
Wiebke Wemheuer-Vogelaar
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
International Relations ◽  
English Language ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Diverse Backgrounds ◽  
Geographic Diversity ◽  
International Publishing ◽  
American Authors

Abstract To what extent is International Relations (IR) a globalized discipline? We investigate the geographic diversity of authorship in seventeen IR journals from Africa, East Asia, Europe, Latin America, North America, and the United Kingdom. Biographical records were collected for the authors of 2,362 articles published between 2011 and 2015. To interpret the data, we discuss how publishing patterns are driven by author incentives (supply) in tandem with editorial preferences and strategies (demand). Our main findings are twofold. First, global IR is fragmented and provincial. All journals frequently publish works by authors located in their own region—but the size of these local clusters varies. Geographic diversity is highest in what we identify as the “goldilocks zone” of international publishing: English-language journals that are globally visible but not so competitive that North American authors crowd out other contributions. Second, IR is being globalized through researcher mobility. Many scholars have moved to pursue their doctoral education and then publish as expats, returnees, or part of the diaspora. They are joined by academic tourists publishing in regions to which they have no obvious ties. IR journals thus feature more diverse backgrounds than it may seem at first sight, but many of these authors were educated in North America, the United Kingdom, and Europe.

LGBTIQ+ Teachers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Gray
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
Sexual Identity ◽  
Major Research ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Gender Diverse ◽  
Western Nations ◽  
And Bisexual ◽  
To Come

Major research that focuses on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer plus (LGBTIQ+) teachers demonstrates that the field encompasses largely Western contexts and shows that although LGBTIQ+ people enjoy legal protections within many Western nations, schools remain dominated by heteronormativity. A major concern for LGBTIQ+ teachers is whether or not to come out at work—this means disclosing one’s gender and/or sexual identity to staff and/or students. In addition, working in schools as a LGBTIQ+ teacher is difficult because it often involves negotiating private and professional worlds in ways that heterosexual and cisgender teachers do not. There remain absences in the work on/with/about LGBTIQ+ teachers, with gender diverse, trans*, and bisexual teachers particularly underrepresented within the literature in the field. Most research on/with/about LGBTIQ+ teachers under discussion here is located within North America, the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, and Australia.

Teaching Psychiatry by Closed-Circuit Television

1968 ◽  
Vol 114 (509) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Trethowan
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
Medical Schools ◽  
Closed Circuit ◽  
Closed Circuit Television ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Teaching Psychiatry ◽  
Substantial Extent

While there are reports from the United Kingdom of the use of closed-circuit TV in medical education, most of those relating specifically to psychiatry appear to have come from North America. There is also one from the U.K. (Stafford-Clark, 1964) and a few others from elsewhere. But even in the U.S.A. there has been no rush to use television. According to Ramey, by 1964 only 179 of 1,500 departments of various kinds in U.S. medical schools were using closed-circuit TV, and only 141 to any substantial extent. Departments of physiology and pharmacology were found to be the prime users, with psychiatry coming a close third.

The Clinical Innovations Conference

2004 ◽  
Vol os11 (4) ◽  
pp. 114-114
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Eaton
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
North America ◽  
Management Team ◽  
Practice Management ◽  
New Materials ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Hands On

At the end of May, an impressive team of speakers from North America and the United Kingdom provided two days of lectures and hands-on sessions that updated delegates on practice management, team dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, endodontics and implantology, with the emphasis on new materials and techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document