Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil Using Guelph Permeameter

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 487-490
Author(s):  
Shubhangi Kakade ◽  
Akanksha Jadhav
1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 957-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Bagarello ◽  
M. Iovino ◽  
W. D. Reynolds

1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 1179-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gallichand ◽  
C. A. Madramootoo ◽  
P. Emight ◽  
S. F. Barrington

Irriga ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-422
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Trevisan ◽  
Luiz Felipe Salemi ◽  
Jorge Marcus de Moraes ◽  
Julio Cesar Martins de Oliveira

 CONDUTIVIDADE HIDRÁULICA DO SOLO SATURADO NA ZONA VADOSA IN SITU E EM LABORATÓRIO  Rodrigo Trevisan1; Luiz Felippe Salemi1;  Jorge Marcos de Moraes1;  Júlio Cesar Martins de Oliveira(4)(1)Laboratório de Ecologia Isotópica, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP,  e-mail: [email protected] (4)Laboratório de Física de Solos, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP  1 RESUMO A condutividade hidráulica do solo é uma propriedade fundamental na determinação da dinâmica da água e de solutos em solos saturados e não - saturados, sendo útil na resolução de problemas relacionados à preservação do meio ambiente, da agricultura e dos recursos hídricos. Muitos métodos são empregados para a sua determinação em solos saturados, tanto em campo como em laboratório, cada um com suas vantagens e desvantagens. Nesse contexto, o objetivo do presente trabalho foi o de comparar um método de campo, o método do permeâmetro de carga constante (“Permeâmetro Guelph”), e um método de laboratório, também de carga constante usando amostras indeformadas de solo, em um solo classificado como Latossolo Vermelho Escuro, da região de Piracicaba - SP. Conclui-se que o método de campo e o método de laboratório não podem ser considerados diferentes. UNITERMOS: permeabilidade; zona não saturada; latossolo; permeâmetro guelph.  TREVISAN, R.; SALEMI, L. F.; MORAES, J. M.; OLIVEIRA, J. C. M. THE SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN THE VADOSE ZONE IN SITU AND IN LABORATORY  2 ABSTRACT The saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil is a fundamental parameter to determine  water and solutes dynamics in the soil, and it is useful  to resolve problems related to environmental, agricultural and water resources preservation. Many methods are used for its determination, in field and in the laboratory, each one with its advantages and disadvantages. The main objective of the present work was to compare a field method, using a constant head permeameter (“Guelph Permeameter”), to a laboratory method also employing a constant head in undisturbed samples in a soil classified as dark red Latosol (Oxisol) in the area ofPiracicaba. The results show, through statistical analysis, that the values obtained by the field and laboratory methods cannot be considered different. KEYWORDS: permeability; unsaturated zone; oxisol;guelph permeameter.


2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Hayashi ◽  
William L. Quinton

Hydrologic understanding of mountainous and northern regions of Canada is poor owing to the lack of critical field data such as hydraulic conductivity. A portable field instrument, the Guelph permeameter (GP), is a promising tool for measuring field-saturated hydraulic conductivity in remote watersheds inaccessible by motorized vehicles. In order to extend the applicability of the GP method to relatively thin soils underlain by impermeable bedrock or permafrost, a new set of shape factors was determined by numerical simulation. The new shape factors gave accurate values of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity when tested in the laboratory. The impermeable layer causes flow around the auger hole to be primarily horizontal. Therefore, the GP method measures a predominantly horizontal field-saturated hydraulic conductivity in these thin soils. The measured conductivity represents a weighted average of the soil surrounding the submerged surface of the auger hole. In layered soil, the weight is greater for the layers close to the bottom of the hole than for those close to the top. Key words: Guelph permeameter, hydraulic conductivity, forest hydrology, permafrost, peat


2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 281 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rodrigo-Comino ◽  
M. Seeger ◽  
J. M. Senciales ◽  
J. D. Ruiz-Sinoga ◽  
J. B. Ries

The vineyards of Ruwer-Mosel valley (Germany) cultivated on steep slopes showed a high spatial and temporal variability of hydrological dynamics. Forty two experiments were carried out using a Guelph permeameter in old and young vines to measure the infiltration rates, the hydraulic conductivity and the soil matrix flux potential. The essays were performed before (spring-summer) and after (autumn) the harvest with dry soil conditions and without soil tillage signals, and with humid soil conditions, signals of soil farming (wheel traffic and footprints) and a decrease of organic matter, respectively. In general, the results of the young vineyards were higher than the values of the old vineyards. Furthermore, all the rates increased after the harvest. For the young vineyards, the most elevated values were registered on the middle slope (398.5 mm h-1 infiltration rate, 89.2 mm h-1 hydraulic conductivity and 62.8 mm2 h-1 soil matrix flux potential). For its part, a decrease of the infiltration from the upper slope to the foot slope was observed (from 42.5 to 16.8 mm h-1). Hydraulic conductivity and soil matrix flux potential showed the same hydro-dynamic: from 13.2 to 5.4 mm h-1 and from 5.5 to 2.5 mm2 h-1, respectively. Finally, it was observed that the most correlated factor with these hydrological processes was the soil moisture content and the soil tillage practices.


Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 472
Author(s):  
Tomáš Orfánus ◽  
Anton Zvala ◽  
Malvína Čierniková ◽  
Dagmar Stojkovová ◽  
Viliam Nagy ◽  
...  

The paper deals with measurements of water infiltration carried out on a well-developed forest floor formed by needle-leaf litter of Norway spruce. Three field methods (tension disk permeameter, single-ring infiltrometer and Guelph permeameter) were used to determine the soil hydraulic conductivity. The results were strongly influenced by the water repellency at the interface between the O- and A-horizons. This interface was severely water repellent during the hot and dry summer season, regardless of the generally humid mountain climate of the High Tatras foothill. The single-ring method paradoxically provided lower hydraulic conductivity (3.2 × 10−4 ± 1.3 × 10−4) compared to the tension disk permeameter (8.5 × 10−4 ± 3.3 × 10−4) due to the presence of the water-repellent O/A-interface. This effect was also observed with the Guelph permeameter method, which gave the lowest value (5.6 × 10−5 ± 4.3 × 10−5). Abrupt retardation of infiltration on the water-repellent interface may generate shallow subsurface runoff (as was proved by the irrigation experiment) or litter splash during extreme rainfall events and promote water flow to deeper soil horizons through preferential pathways. The observed effects of the forest floor on rainfall infiltration will depend on the seasonal variability of soil water repellency. Although the forest floor is a source of hydrophobic substances that cause water repellency at the O/A-interface and can trigger runoff generation, at the same time its cohesive duff layer protects the forest soil from erosion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document