scholarly journals SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MENENTUKAN POSISI PEMAIN IDEAL DALAM TIM SEPAK BOLA DENGAN METODE ALGORITMA GENETIKA

Compiler ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hizkia Alprianta ◽  
Anton Setiawan Honggowibowo ◽  
Yuliani Indrianingsih

So far, there are coaches who are less precise in determining the ideal position of the player as it only relies on instinct and the ego of the players so that there is still a coach who has not been able to objectively assess the players.By utilizing the method of Genetic Algorithm as Decision Support System (DSS) in the process of determining the ideal position of a player who uses several criteria (multicriteria) to choose a proper player. DSS is helping coach in making the right decisions and Genetic Algorithm is used as a model for multicriteria weighting in the selection process. This application was built with tools Borland Delphi (7.0) as the user interface design and media processing PostgreSQL as its database.            Based on these results we can conclude that this application expected to assist the coaches in the decision making process and can change the appraisal of which are subjective to more objective, to determine the ideal position for a player, can determine the best position of each position of a number of players and the expected results of the Genetic Algorithm on the system constructed in accordance with the results of manual calculations.

Author(s):  
David Sammon ◽  
Daivd Lawlor

In this chapter a case study of a world-class manufacturing organisation implementing SAP is purposefully used to demonstrate the influence of bias over requirements in the decision making process. Furthermore, this research highlights the difficulties in determining if the ERP package selected by an organisation is in fact the right software package, to fulfil the functional requirements of the organisation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
M Panji Ismail

The scholarship path is one of the paths used by the University of Technology Yogyakarta (UTY) in accepting new students. The track consists of seven criteria: school accreditation, family condition, report card score, achievement, written test, interview test. In order to process the criteria, it is necessary to have a Decision Support System (DSS) capable of conducting the scholarship selection process quickly, accurately and objectively. DSS is a system that can perform a decision-making process based on the human mindset. SPK can tolerate any kind of data whether it is certain or uncertain. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) category which is a decision-making technique of some alternative options, especially Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADC). TOPSIS aims to determine the ideal ideal solution and the ideal negative solution of the scholarship criteria. A positive ideal solution maximizes benefit criteria and minimizes cost criteria, whereas a negative ideal solution maximizes cost criteria and minimizes benefit criteria. The research methodology used is SDLC (System Development Life Cycle) and system implementation built using Delphi 7 programming language and data processing using DBMS SQL Server 2012.. The results of the system show that the system provides accurate and valid results in accordance with the data owned by prospective students so that full scholarship can be given in the right target.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6581
Author(s):  
Jooyoung Hwang ◽  
Anita Eves ◽  
Jason L. Stienmetz

Travellers have high standards and regard restaurants as important travel attributes. In the tourism and hospitality industry, the use of developed tools (e.g., smartphones and location-based tablets) has been popularised as a way for travellers to easily search for information and to book venues. Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews based on the face-to-face approach was adopted for this study to examine how consumers’ restaurant selection processes are performed with the utilisation of social media on smartphones. Then, thematic analysis was adopted. The findings of this research show that the adoption of social media on smartphones is positively related with consumers’ gratification. More specifically, when consumers regard that process, content and social gratification are satisfied, their intention to adopt social media is fulfilled. It is suggested by this study that consumers’ restaurant decision-making process needs to be understood, as each stage of the decision-making process is not independent; all the stages of the restaurant selection process are organically connected and influence one another.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilat Levy

In this paper I analyze the effect of transparency on decision making in committees. I focus on committees whose members are motivated by career concerns. The main result is that when the decision-making process is secretive (when individual votes are not revealed to the public), committee members comply with preexisting biases. For example, if the voting rule demands a supermajority to accept a reform, individuals vote more often against reforms. Transparent committees are therefore more likely to accept reforms. I also find that coupled with the right voting rule, a secretive procedure may induce better decisions than a transparent one. (JEL D71, D72)


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Dasarius Gulo

In the process of selecting Indonesian Workers (TKI) based on quality at PT. Adila Prezkifarindo Duta is classified as still manual, where there is not yet a system for selecting quality migrant workers so it requires a long time for its assessment and the selection process is less effective. To support decision making in the selection of qualified Indonesian Workers (TKI) to make it easier by using a decision support system. One method used in the selection of qualified Indonesian Workers is the Profile Matching method. The profile matching method is a decision-making mechanism by assuming that there is an ideal level of predictor variables that must be met by applicants, rather than the minimum level that must be met or passed. In the profile matching process a process will be compared between individual competencies into standard competencies so that different competencies can be identified (also called Gap). The smaller the gap produced, the greater the weight value. In matching this profile, the selected TKI candidates are Indonesian Workers who are closest to the ideal profile of a qualified TKI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1235-1241
Author(s):  
Marina Badarovska Mishevska

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, based on mathematics and psychology. The method was developed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s and has been extensively studied and refined since then. It has particular application in group decision making and is used around the world in a wide variety of decision situation. Rather than prescribing a "correct" decision, the AHP helps decision makers choose one that best suits their goal and their understanding of the problem. The technique provides a comprehensive and rational framework for structuring a decision problem, for representing and quantifying its elements, for relating those elements to overall goals, and for evaluating alternative solutions. Decision making is the choice of one alternative, from two or more, to which the course of the activity is directed and the problem is solved. The decision-making process is a rational attempt by the manager to achieve the goals of the organizational unit. The decision-making process can be thought of as a "brain and nervous system" of an enterprise. Decisions are made when a person wants things to be different in the future. Given each specific situation, making the right decisions is probably one of the most difficult challenges for managers. Managers in day-to-day work deliver programmed and unprogrammed decisions that solve simple or complex problems. Simple decisions have an impact on the short-term performance of the enterprise, and complex decisions have an impact on the long-term future and success of the enterprise. Users of the AHP first decompose their decision problem into a hierarchy of more easily comprehended sub-problems, each of which can be analyzed independently. Once the hierarchy is built, the decision makers systematically evaluate its various elements by comparing them to each other two at a time, with respect to their impact on an element above them in the hierarchy. The AHP converts these evaluations to numerical values that can be processed and compared over the entire range of the problem. In this article, it is explained the application of the AHP method in order to evaluate and promote employees in the enterprise "X" with several criteria. The obtained results enable the manager to evaluate the employees in an objective way and make an objective decision for their promotion. Its application for selecting the best among employees, in their assessment and promotion, allows managers to use a specific and mathematical tool to support the decision. This tool not only supports and qualifies decisions, it also allows managers to justify their choice, as well as to simulate possible results.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Dana Indra Sensuse ◽  
Wiliam Suhaidir

Penelitian ini membahas tentang perancangan Digital Dashboard System pada PT XYZ dan dampaknya pada perusahaan tersebut dalam hal pengambilan keputusan. Digital Dashboard dirancang untuk dapat menyajikan sensitivity analysis kinerja keuangan rugi-labarugi-laba PT XYZ. Pada penelitian ini, proses perancangan Digital Dashboard dimulai dari identifikasi variabel, identifikasi user requirement, perancangan user interface hingga proses pengujian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Digital Dashboard yang baik harus dapat merepresentasikan data yang padat dengan tampilan yang efisien, menarik dan mudah untuk dimengerti. Penelitian ini juga menyatakan bahwa Digital Dashboard yang baik dapat meningkatkan efektifitas eksekutif perusahaan dalam proses pengambilan keputusan. This study discusses the design of the Digital Dashboard System on PT XYZ and its impact on the company in terms of decision making. Digital Dashboard is designed to provide sensitivity analysis of financial performance of PT XYZ's income statement. In this study, the Digital Dashboard design process starts from the identification of variables, identification of user requirements, designing the user interface to the testing process. The results of this study indicate that the good Digital Dashboard should be able to represent the solid data with the efficient view, attractive and easy to understand. The study also states that the good Digital Dashboard can improve the effectiveness of corporate executives in decision-making process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
M. Aminul Islam ◽  
M. Abdul Awal

ABSTRACT Introduction Selecting the most appropriate treatment for each patient is the key activity in patient-physician encounters and providing healthcare services. Achieving desirable clinical goals mostly depends on making the right decision at the right time in any healthcare setting. But little is known about physicians' clinical decision-making in the primary care setting in Bangladesh. Therefore, this study explored the factors that influence decisions about prescribing medications, ordering pathologic tests, counseling patients, average length of patient visits in a consultation session, and referral of patients to other physicians or hospitals by physicians at Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) in the country. It also explored the structure of physicians' social networks and their association with the decision-making process. Methods This was a cross-sectional descriptive study that used primary data collected from 85 physicians. The respondents, who work at UHCs in the Rajshahi Division, were selected purposively. The collected data were analyzed with descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, one-way analysis of variance, and linear regression to understand relationships among the variables. Results The results of the study reveal that multiple factors influence physicians' decisions about prescribing medications, ordering pathologic tests, length of visits, counseling patients, and referring patients to other physicians or hospitals at the UHCs. Most physicians prescribe drugs to their patients, keeping in mind their purchasing capacity. Risk of violence by patients' relatives and better management are the two key factors that influence physicians' referral decisions. The physicians' professional and personal social networks also play an influential role in the decision-making process. It was found that physicians dedicate on average 16.17 minutes to a patient in a consultation session. The length of visits is influenced by various factors including the distance between the physicians' residence and their workplace, their level of education, and the number of colleagues with whom they have regular contact and from whom they can seek help. Conclusion The results of the study have yielded some novel insights about the complexity of physicians' everyday tasks at the UHCs in Bangladesh. The results would be of interest to public health researchers and policy makers.


2018 ◽  
pp. 24-62
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Hertzberg

This chapter criticizes the ideal of public reason, showing that even when it is specified in several plausible ways, it does not provide citizens with sufficient guidance in evaluating religious politics. Instead, the ideal must be placed within a larger, way-of-life conception of democracy that considers religion’s roles in citizens’ civic lives. The chapter develops a minimal conception of public reason and analyses two criticisms of it: that public reason is a culturally protestant political approach that ignores crucial aspects of religion and that public reason violates religious citizens’ integrity. It then assesses two predominant responses to the second criticism: restricting the domain of public reason norms and adopting the convergence conception of public justification. Both responses demonstrate public reason’s inability to offer citizens sufficient guidance in evaluating religion’s political influence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document