scholarly journals An evaluation of regional anesthesia complications and patient satisfaction after cesarean section

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 813-817
Author(s):  
Havva Esra UYAR TÜRKYILMAZ ◽  
Nuray CAMGÖZ ERYILMAZ ◽  
Nihan AYDIN GÜZEY
2011 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 1064-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wui-Chiu Mui ◽  
Chia-Ming Chang ◽  
Kong-Fah Cheng ◽  
Tak-Yu Lee ◽  
Kwok-On Ng ◽  
...  

Background To fulfill the increasing demand of service quality improvement in recent years, it is imperative to develop a proper instrument to evaluate patient satisfaction with perioperative anesthetic care for many institutes in Taiwan. Methods We used a six-factor 32-item pilot questionnaire developed in our previous study as our starting point in this study. Exploratory factor analysis of the pilot questionnaire for factor structure generation was performed in general anesthesia patients (group 1, n = 320) and resulted in the generation of the Patient Satisfaction with Perioperative Anesthetic Care questionnaire (PSPACq). Confirmatory factor analysis of the PSPACq in general anesthesia (group 2, n = 565) and regional anesthesia (group 3, n = 225) patients was performed for validation and cross-validation of the PSPACq model, respectively. The confounding variables and the patient loyalty effects on PSPACq scores were analyzed to evaluate the nomological validity of the PSPACq. Result Exploratory factor analysis of the pilot questionnaire in group 1 resulted in the development of the PSPACq (a seven-factor 30-item model). The standardized coefficients and indexes for the assessment of fit of the PSPACq model in group 2 (validation) and group 3 (cross-validation) patients revealed a well-fitting model. The results of the loyalty scores and confounding variables support the nomological validity of the PSPACq. Conclusions A valid and reliable questionnaire (PSPACq) with Taiwanese culture characteristics was developed and is suitable for testing of patient satisfaction with perioperative anesthesia care for patients receiving general or regional anesthesia for their surgery.


2010 ◽  
pp. 296-312
Author(s):  
Raymond S. Sinatra ◽  
Dan B. Froicu

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Matthew P. Evangelista ◽  
John Hubert C. Pua ◽  
Mara Therese P. Evangelista-Huber

Background: To compare outcomes of atraumatic hand surgeries using the WALANT technique versus intravenous regional anesthesia or local anesthesia with tourniquet. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to October 2018. All randomized or quasi-randomized trials and cohort studies comparing WALANT procedure versus local anesthesia or intravenous regional anesthesia with tourniquet among atraumatic hand surgeries were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias of eligible studies were assessed by three independent reviewers. The random effects model was used due to both statistical and clinical heterogeneity among studies. Results: The search yielded 496 records, of which 9 studies were included in the systematic review. We were able to pool findings for operative time, post-operative pain scores, patient satisfaction, and complication rates. On the average, the WALANT group had longer operative times by 2.06 minutes (pooled mean difference, random effects, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 3.67 minutes, p = 0.01, I2 0%, p = 0.66). The post-operative pain scores were lower in the WALANT group by an average of two VAS points (random effects, pooled mean difference −2.40, 95% confidence interval −3.41 to −1.38, p < 0.00001; I2 0% p = 0.99). We had insufficient evidence to demonstrate a difference in terms of patient satisfaction (random effects, pooled risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03, p = 0.36, I2 0%, p = 0.64) and complication rates (random effects, pooled risk ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.18, p = 0.29, I2 60% p = 0.08) between WALANT versus conventional methods. Conclusions: The WALANT group reported lower post-operative pain scores, but had slightly longer operative times. There are no significant differences between WALANT and conventional methods in terms of patient satisfaction and complication rates.


2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Jelting ◽  
Christian Klein ◽  
Thomas Harlander ◽  
Leopold Eberhart ◽  
Norbert Roewer ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 242
Author(s):  
E. Langesaeter ◽  
M. Dragsund ◽  
L.A. Rosseland

2018 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 72S-73S
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. Rimsza ◽  
Megan OʼBrien ◽  
Collin Miller ◽  
Laura Vricella

1979 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-387
Author(s):  
A. Barrie Taylor ◽  
Martin T. Bryant ◽  
Goures C. Ghosh-Ray

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document