scholarly journals Perceived Barriers to Discussing End of Life Care Planning

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Bouchard
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
Eol Care

Advance care planning (ACP) related to end of life (EOL) care is an often neglected area in primary care. Nurse care managers (NCM’s) are in a unique position to initiate earlier conversations about illness management and patient preferences regarding end of life so patients have the opportunity to make choices and have their wish known while they are still cognitively independent. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to identify barriers to discussions about end of life care with patients in clinical practice. Six NCM’s participated in two focus groups to identify perceived barriers for end of life care discussions and to identify potential solutions to those barriers. Barriers identified included: patient/family factors, organizational factors, and provider related factors. NCM solutions identified included patient related interventions such as normalizing and routinizing EOL/ACP discussion reviewing choices at all ages annually. Organizational solutions recommended include making EOL care discussions a quality measure and training all office staff to support culture change. Provider related recommendations included providers completing their own advance directive as a way to lead the way for patients. Implications for education, practice, policy, and research are identified.

scholarly journals Chameleon project: a children’s end-of-life care quality improvement project

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e001520
Author(s):  
Toni Wolff ◽  
Caroline Dorsett ◽  
Alexander Connolly ◽  
Nicola Kelly ◽  
Jennifer Turnbull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Quality Improvement Project ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Marginal Rate ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Bed Days

In response to there being no specialist paediatric palliative care (PPC) team in a region of England, we undertook a 12-month quality improvement project (funded by National Health Service England’s Marginal Rate Emergency Threshold and Readmission fund) to improve children’s end-of-life care.Improvements were implemented during two plan–do–study–act (PDSA) cycles and included specialist experts, clinical champions, focused education and training, and tools and materials to support identification, care planning and communication. A lead paediatrician with expertise in PPC (10 hours/week) led the project, supported by a PPC nurse (3 days/week) and a network administrator (2 days/week).Children who died an expected death were identified from the child death review teams. Numbers of non-elective hospital admissions, bed days, and costs were identified.Twenty-nine children died an expected death during the 12 months of the project and coincidentally 29 children died an expected death during the previous 12 months. The median number of non-elective admissions in the last 12 months of life was reduced from two per child to one. There was a reduction in specialist hospital (14%) and district general hospital (38%) bed days. The percentage of children who died an expected death who had anticipatory care plans rose from 50% to 72%.The results indicate that a network of clinicians with expertise in PPC working together across a region can improve personalised care planning and reduce admissions and bed days for children in their last year-of-life with reduced bed utilisation costs.

scholarly journals Caregiver perceptions of end-of-life care in patients with high-grade glioma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
John T Fortunato ◽  
Meredith Van Harn ◽  
Sameah A Haider ◽  
Joel Phillips ◽  
Tobias Walbert
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Eol Care

Abstract Background Patients dying from high-grade gliomas (HGG) suffer from high symptom burden in the end-of-life (EoL) phase. Family caregivers are most informed about the patient’s symptoms and disease course. The aim of this study is to assess caregiver perception on quality of EoL care of HGG patients. Methods Caregivers prospectively participated in the Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview, part of the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End-of-Life Care (TIME survey). This validated survey assesses EoL care in areas such as physical comfort and emotional support, advance care planning, focus on the individual, attention to family, and coordination of care. The quality of EoL care was measured by domain scores (0 = care was always optimal, 1 = care was always suboptimal) or with a 0-10 scale. Results Of the 55 enrolled family caregivers, 44 completed the interview and rated the overall care high (8.90 ± 1.36/10), perceived that patients’ wishes were respected (9.46 ± 0.95) and that they died in dignity (9.65 ± 0.98). Caregivers perceived high satisfaction with information and decision-making (0.18), advance care planning (0.19), focus on the individual (0.16), and care coordination (0.11). Attention to family (0.25) needed improvement. Only 41% of caregivers were confident that they knew what to do at the time of death and 46% felt that the healthcare team did not provide them with someone to turn to in distress. Conclusions Caregivers reported high overall satisfaction with EoL HGG care, though attention to family and communication needed improvement. Focus should therefore be on improved caregiver communication to improve EoL care, caregiver burnout, and bereavement in HGG populations.

Nursing Home Resident, Family, and Staff Perspectives on Hospital Transfers for End-of-Life Care

2021 ◽  
pp. 003022282199770
Author(s):  
Janet Sopcheck ◽  
Ruth M. Tappen
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Terminally Ill ◽  
South Florida ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care

Residents who are terminally ill often experience transfers to the emergency department resulting in hospitalizations, which may be potentially avoidable with treatment in the nursing home. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of 15 residents, 10 family members, and 20 nursing home staff regarding end-of-life care and the circumstances prompting resident transfers. Data analysis of participant interviews conducted January to May 2019 in a South Florida nursing home identified four themes related to transfer to the hospital: time left to live, when aggressive treatments would be unavailing, not knowing what the nursing home can do, and transfer decisions are situation-dependent. Study findings underscore the importance of increasing resident and family awareness of treatments available in the nursing home and person-centered advance care planning discussions. Further research should explore the reasons for residents’ and family members’ choice of aggressive therapies and their goals for care at the end of life.

scholarly journals Unraveling the Effects of Social Class and Systemic Racism on Advance Care Planning

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 472-472
Author(s):  
Jenny McDonnell
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Black Americans ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Using Data

Abstract While advance care planning (ACP) is recognized as a key facilitator of high-quality, goal-concordant end-of-life care, black Americans are less likely to participate in ACP than non-Hispanic whites (Carr 2011; Detering et al. 2010). There are divided explanations for why these disparities persist. Some scholars attribute racial disparities in end-of-life care to socioeconomic (SES) differences between black and white Americans citing blacks’ and whites’ differentiated access to, control over, and use of material resources (Wilson 1978; Yearby 2011). Others assert that health care preferences do not solely reflect lack of resources or health literacy, but that the larger social context frames care preferences differently across racial and ethnic groups in American society (Alegria et al. 2011; Sewell and Pingel forthcoming). By turning the analytical lens to class-privileged black Americans, I investigate whether racism overflows the margins of class disadvantage. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, I ran logistic regression and moderation models. I found that class-privileged blacks are less likely to engage in ACP than both high-SES and low-SES whites. The interaction of race and SES was negatively and significantly associated with ACP (OR=0.91; P<0.05), indicating that SES has a stronger effect on the probability of ACP among whites than among blacks. Predicted probabilities show that 51% of low-SES whites are likely to engage in ACP compared to 32% of high-SES blacks. These findings indicate that racialized disparities in ACP exist independent of SES, and that the effects of SES and race are intersectional rather than simply additive.

545: END-OF-LIFE CARE FOR CHILDREN WITH MEDICAL COMPLEXITY: DOES ADVANCE CARE PLANNING MATTER?

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 213-213
Author(s):  
Danielle DeCourcey ◽  
Melanie Silverman ◽  
Adeolu Oladunjoye ◽  
Joanne Wolfe
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Children With Medical Complexity ◽  
Medical Complexity ◽  
Advance Care

Advance care planning and end-of-life care in a network of rural Western Australian hospitals

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Auret ◽  
Craig Sinclair ◽  
Barbara Averill ◽  
Sharon Evans
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Western Australian

scholarly journals Caregiver evaluation of the quality of end-of-life care (CEQUEL) scale: The caregiver’s perception of patient care near death.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6573-6573
Author(s):  
Philip C Higgins ◽  
Holly Gwen Prigerson
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Trauma Symptoms ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

6573 Background: End-of-life (EOL) measures are limited in capturing caregiver assessment of the quality of EOL care. None include caregiver perception of patient suffering and prolongation of death. We developed and validated the Caregiver Evaluation of Quality of End-of-Life Care (CEQUEL) scale, a more comprehensive measure of caregiver-perceived quality of EOL care. Methods: Data were derived from Coping with Cancer (CwC), a multisite, prospective, longitudinal study of advanced cancer patients and their caregivers (N=275 dyads). Caregivers were assessed before and after patient deaths. CEQUEL’s factor structure was examined; reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α, and convergent validity by the strength of associations between CEQUEL scores and key EOL outcomes. Results: Factor analysis revealed four distinct factors: Prolongation of Death, Perceived Suffering, Shared Decision-Making, and Preparation for the Death. Each item loaded strongly on only a single factor. The 13-item CEQUEL and its subscales showed moderate to acceptable Cronbach’s α (range: 0.52-0.78). 53% of caregivers reported patients suffering more than expected. Higher CEQUEL scores were positively associated with therapeutic alliance (r=.13; p≤.05) and hospice enrollment (z=-2.09; p≤.05), and negatively associated with bereaved caregiver regret (r=-.36, p≤.001) and trauma symptoms (z=-2.06; p≤.05). Conclusions: CEQUEL is a brief, valid measure of quality of EOL care from the caregiver’s perspective. It is the first scale to include perceived suffering and prolongation of death. If validated in future work, it may prove a useful quality indicator for the delivery of EOL care and a risk indicator for poor bereavement adjustment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document