Planning Sagittal Plane Deformity Correction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Assaker
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. S126-S127
Author(s):  
International Spine Study Group ◽  
Gregory M. Mundis ◽  
Jay D. Turner ◽  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Juan S. Uribe ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. S154-S155
Author(s):  
Mostafa H. El Dafrawy ◽  
Virginie Lafage ◽  
Richard Hostin ◽  
Christopher P. Ames ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. E157-E158
Author(s):  
Avery L Buchholz ◽  
Thomas J Buell ◽  
Mark E Shaffrey ◽  
Regis W Haid ◽  
Christopher I Shaffrey

Abstract Spinal deformity management can be difficult. The decision for surgery, approach, number of levels, and surgical technique all present challenges. Even when other issues are managed appropriately the process of how to correct the deformity needs special consideration. Numerous techniques have been studied including vertebra-to-rod, rod de-rotation, 3-rod-techniques, and cantilever maneuvers. While cantilever is the preferred technique when treating sagittal plane deformity, scoliosis often requires a combination of techniques due to the complexity of deformity in coronal and transverse planes. This video illustrates an adult scoliosis correction using sequential reduction towers and de-rotation techniques. Using this method the step of hook holders is eliminated and tension is distributed evenly across the rod using sequential reduction of the reduction towers across the length of the rod. This has led to a very efficient correction of our deformity as well as a powerful de-rotation tool. We routinely use this technique for flexible and rigid deformities, which is assessed pre-op with a computed tomography. The patient is a 67-yr-old female with prior lumbar decompressions and worsening back pain with radiculopathy. No significant sagittal malalignment is present but pelvic tilt is elevated and a coronal deformity exists. pelvic incidence measures 59°, LL50°, PT28° and lumbar scoliosis shows a coronal Cobb angle of 50.8°. Briefly, surgery involved transpedicular instrumentation from T10-S1 with bilateral iliac screw fixation. To achieve mobility posterior column osteotomies were performed at T12-L1, L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels. TLIF was performed at L4-5, L5-S1 for fusion. Postoperative scoliosis X-rays demonstrated improved sagittal and coronal alignment with PI59°, LL59°, PT22°, and coronal Cobb angle of 12°.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 222-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Mundis ◽  
Juan S. Uribe ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni ◽  
Neel Anand ◽  
Paul Park ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. E16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheerag D. Upadhyaya ◽  
Sigurd Berven ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a powerful technique for correcting a fixed sagittal plane deformity. The authors report the case of a 51-year-old man with a history of multiple prior lumbar operations, flat-back syndrome, thoracic kyphosis, and radiculopathy, who underwent deformity correction surgery with T3–S1 pedicle screw fixation and L-3 PSO. Progressive spondylolisthesis of the PSO segment associated with rod fracture then developed. The patient subsequently underwent anterior and posterior revision surgery. This case is a rare instance of spondylolisthesis following PSO.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document