scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Two Risk Assessment Methods in Information Systems

10.28945/1842 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Božo Nikolic ◽  
Ljiljana Ruzic-Dimitrijevic
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Assessment Methods

Review and classification of false information systems (FIS)

2020 ◽  
pp. 36-39
Author(s):  
M.A. Kobilev ◽  
E.S. Abramov
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
False Information

The article considers false information systems and conducts their comparative analysis, considering the tasks that they perform, which technologies rely on, and what role is played in protecting information when they are used. The goal is to identify relevant false information systems, to formulate criteria in accordance with which classification is carried out. The problems of false information systems are identified, further work in this topic is determined.

scholarly journals Impact of comorbidity assessment methods to predict non-cancer mortality risk in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study using the National Health Insurance Service claims-based data in Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghee Lee ◽  
Yoon Jung Chang ◽  
Hyunsoon Cho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
National Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Mortality Risks

Abstract Background Cancer patients’ prognoses are complicated by comorbidities. Prognostic prediction models with inappropriate comorbidity adjustments yield biased survival estimates. However, an appropriate claims-based comorbidity risk assessment method remains unclear. This study aimed to compare methods used to capture comorbidities from claims data and predict non-cancer mortality risks among cancer patients. Methods Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database in Korea; 2979 cancer patients diagnosed in 2006 were considered. Claims-based Charlson Comorbidity Index was evaluated according to the various assessment methods: different periods in washout window, lookback, and claim types. The prevalence of comorbidities and associated non-cancer mortality risks were compared. The Cox proportional hazards models considering left-truncation were used to estimate the non-cancer mortality risks. Results The prevalence of peptic ulcer, the most common comorbidity, ranged from 1.5 to 31.0%, and the proportion of patients with ≥1 comorbidity ranged from 4.5 to 58.4%, depending on the assessment methods. Outpatient claims captured 96.9% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; however, they captured only 65.2% of patients with myocardial infarction. The different assessment methods affected non-cancer mortality risks; for example, the hazard ratios for patients with moderate comorbidity (CCI 3–4) varied from 1.0 (95% CI: 0.6–1.6) to 5.0 (95% CI: 2.7–9.3). Inpatient claims resulted in relatively higher estimates reflective of disease severity. Conclusions The prevalence of comorbidities and associated non-cancer mortality risks varied considerably by the assessment methods. Researchers should understand the complexity of comorbidity assessments in claims-based risk assessment and select an optimal approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document