Impairment of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia

10.2741/705 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol E6 (2) ◽  
pp. 236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galia Avidan
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1565-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galia Avidan ◽  
Michal Tanzer ◽  
Fadila Hadj-Bouziane ◽  
Ning Liu ◽  
Leslie G. Ungerleider ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1573-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eelke de Vries ◽  
Daniel Baldauf

We recorded magnetoencephalography using a neural entrainment paradigm with compound face stimuli that allowed for entraining the processing of various parts of a face (eyes, mouth) as well as changes in facial identity. Our magnetic response image-guided magnetoencephalography analyses revealed that different subnodes of the human face processing network were entrained differentially according to their functional specialization. Whereas the occipital face area was most responsive to the rate at which face parts (e.g., the mouth) changed, and face patches in the STS were mostly entrained by rhythmic changes in the eye region, the fusiform face area was the only subregion that was strongly entrained by the rhythmic changes in facial identity. Furthermore, top–down attention to the mouth, eyes, or identity of the face selectively modulated the neural processing in the respective area (i.e., occipital face area, STS, or fusiform face area), resembling behavioral cue validity effects observed in the participants' RT and detection rate data. Our results show the attentional weighting of the visual processing of different aspects and dimensions of a single face object, at various stages of the involved visual processing hierarchy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 199-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kornél Németh ◽  
Márta Zimmer ◽  
Krisztina Nagy ◽  
Éva Bankó ◽  
Zoltán Vidnyánszky ◽  
...  

Neuron ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 352-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Pi Ku ◽  
Andreas S. Tolias ◽  
Nikos K. Logothetis ◽  
Jozien Goense

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Engell ◽  
Na Yeon Kim ◽  
Gregory McCarthy

Perception of faces has been shown to engage a domain-specific set of brain regions, including the occipital face area (OFA) and the fusiform face area (FFA). It is commonly held that the OFA is responsible for the detection of faces in the environment, whereas the FFA is responsible for processing the identity of the face. However, an alternative model posits that the FFA is responsible for face detection and subsequently recruits the OFA to analyze the face parts in the service of identification. An essential prediction of the former model is that the OFA is not sensitive to the arrangement of internal face parts. In the current fMRI study, we test the sensitivity of the OFA and FFA to the configuration of face parts. Participants were shown faces in which the internal parts were presented in a typical configuration (two eyes above a nose above a mouth) or in an atypical configuration (the locations of individual parts were shuffled within the face outline). Perception of the atypical faces evoked a significantly larger response than typical faces in the OFA and in a wide swath of the surrounding posterior occipitotemporal cortices. Surprisingly, typical faces did not evoke a significantly larger response than atypical faces anywhere in the brain, including the FFA (although some subthreshold differences were observed). We propose that face processing in the FFA results in inhibitory sculpting of activation in the OFA, which accounts for this region's weaker response to typical than to atypical configurations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document