Functional outcome of unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fractures in elderly treated with primary bipolar hemiarthoplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-38
Author(s):  
Talluri V G Krishna ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures

EVALUATE INTRAOPERATIVE VARIABLES AND POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES WITH VULNERABLE/ BROKEN LATERAL WALL MANAGED WITH SHORT AND LONG CEPHALOMEDULLARY NAIL

2021 ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Wasim Ahmed ◽  
Indrajeet Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
One Year ◽  
Lateral Walls

Purpose: To evaluate intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes of intertrochanteric fractures with vulnerable/broken lateral walls managed with short and long cephalomedullary nails. Materials & Methodology: Twenty prospective cases of patients treated with LCMN and twenty retrospective cases treated with SCMN were included in the study. Intraoperative variables compared were duration of surgery, blood loss during surgery, and surgeon's perception of surgery. Functional outcome was evaluated by Parker Palmer mobility score (PPMS), Harris hip score (HHS), and Short Form-12 at one year. Radiological assessment were done at six months/one year to look for progress of fracture union, change in neck-shaft angle, and any signs of implant failure. Results: Duration of surgery (p<0.001), blood loss during surgery (p=0.002), and surgeon's perception of surgery (p=0.002) were signicantly more in the LCMN group. The LCMN group had a better functional outcome. HHS for the LCMN group was 89.15±9.53, and for the SCMN group it was 81.53±13.21 (p=0.021). PPMS for LCMN group was 8.85± 0.67 and for the SCMN group was 7.53±1.807 (p=0.005). There were four implant failures in the LCMN group compared to none in the SCMN group (p=0.036). Conclusion: Both SCMN and LCMN are effective treatment modalities for unstable intertrochanteric fractures with vulnerable/broken lateral walls. In the absence of more extensive study and long-term follow-up, the superiority of one implant over the other cannot be recommended.

scholarly journals A study to assess proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device in surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
E. S. Radhe Shyam ◽  
K. Ashwin
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The incidence of inter trochanteric fracture is expected to have doubled by 2040. Inter trochanteric fractures account for about 45% to 50% of all hip fractures in the elderly populationand out of these, near about 50% to 60% are classified as unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure. This study as performed<strong> </strong>to assess functional outcome with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture management.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> It was prospective observational study done for a period of 1year from January 2016-January 2017 among patients who attended OPD or emergency department with intertrochanteric fracture. Two different implants were used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Excellent results in functional outcome was more in case of PFN (66.6%) compared to DHS (50%). The type of trauma in DHS group was road traffic accident in 38.8%, domestic fall in 50% and others such as assault was in 11.1% while in PFN group intertrochanteric fracture was seen in 61.1% due to domestic fall.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The functional outcome was more better with proximal femoral nail (PFN) compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS). Therefore, proximal femoral nail (PFN) should be preferred for management of intertrochanteric fractures.</p>

Dynamic Hip Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures - A Retrospective Analysis from Rajasthan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (26) ◽  
pp. 2271-2277
Author(s):  
Gajanand Shriram Dhaked ◽  
Abhishek Komalsingh Jaroli ◽  
Khushboo Parmanand Malav ◽  
Harish Narayan Singh Rajpurohit
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Hip Screw

BACKGROUND Current management of Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures has evolved with the introduction of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN). The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between the DHS and PFN for IT fracture fixation. METHODS This study is a retrospective comparative analysis of 455 patients with IT fractures; DHS (292) and PFN (163), who were treated from June 2012 to June 2015. The patients were reviewed postoperatively for a minimum of 12 months to evaluate functional outcome using Salvati-Wilson score. Categorical data was present as absolute number or percentages, and parametric variables were presented as Mean ± SD, while non parametric data were presented as median. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS Intramedullary nails offer no advantage over extramedullary devices to treat IT fractures caused by low-energy trauma (AO 31 - A1). However, clinically significant outcomes were established for PFN group in terms of duration of surgery, x- ray exposure and SW Score for AO / OTA 31 - A2 and 31 - A3. Reoperations encountered for local pain due to implant prominence were significantly higher in the PFN group (4.90 % versus 1.02 %). Kaplan Meier survival probability of 69.3 % and 79.5 % predicted for DHS and PFN respectively, 3 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Our conclusion reinforces indication for PFN in unstable IT fractures (31 - A2 and 31 - A3), owing to its better functional outcome and biomechanical properties. Functional outcomes for stable IT fracture (AO 31 - A1) were comparable between DHS and PFN, therefore final decision for implant choice depends on implant cost, surgeon’s preference for specific technique. However, understanding the morphology of proximal femur, peritrochanteric region is crucial to analyse the anatomical variations in Indian population which will provide the basis for intramedullary nail design modifications. KEYWORDS Intertrochanteric Fractures, DHS Fixation, PFN Fixation

scholarly journals A comparative study on the functional outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated by proximal femoral nailing or dynamic hip screw fixation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Gineshmon Chandy ◽  
Saju S.
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nailing ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nailing ◽  
Radiological Union ◽  
Unstable Fractures

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the commonly occurring injuries in elderly patients and are high among females and those with osteoporosis. They were treated with either dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or proximal femoral nailing (PFNA2) here at our institution. The study was conducted in order to find which method of surgical fixation has better functional outcome.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Total 96 patients of intertrochanteric fractures admitted during the study period of November 2017 to April 2019 were included for the study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups; DHS was used as implant in group1 and PFNA2 in group 2. Postoperatively patients were followed up after 1 month, 3months and 6 months of the surgery and were assessed using Harris hip score.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Harris hip score was higher with PFNA2 group compared to DHS group in all follow-ups. In unstable fractures DHS group had poor outcome compared to PFNA2. Radiological union occurred in 27.1 % cases by 3 months and 72.9% cases by 6 months with DHS whereas 70.8% and 97.9% respectively with PFNA2.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> PFNA2 gives a better functional outcome when compared to DHS. Even though DHS gives good functional outcome in stable fractures it is not so in the case of unstable fractures. The radiological union also is faster with proximal femoral nailing. Hence in our opinion PFNA2 can be the better fixation device compared to DHS especially in unstable fractures.  </p>

scholarly journals A comparative study of proximal femoral fracture fixation with proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw and plating

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 871
Author(s):  
Sridhar D. K. ◽  
Veeranna H. D. ◽  
Madhusudan H.
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Proximal Femoral Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Equal Distribution ◽  
Intramedullary Device ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Trochanteric fractures are one of the commonest injuries sustained predominantly in patients over sixty years of age. They are three to four times more common in women. These usually occur through bone affected by osteoporosis; trivial fall being most common mechanism of injury Approximately 10-30% of patients die within one year of an intertrochanteric fracture.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective study comprising of patients identified for surgical treatment of fracture in the intertrochanteric region of femur admitted to Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur from 2016 to 2017 where 30 patients with 30 intertrochanteric fractures of femur were selected with equal distribution of 15 dynamic hip screw devices and 15 intramedullary devices.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The purpose of the present study is to verify theoretical advantages of intramedullary device over the dynamic hip screw devices and also whether it actually alters the eventual functional outcome of the patient. Excellent results were seen in 2 patients (13.3%) in the DHS group and in 6 patients (40%) in the PFN group. The overall functional outcome of patients treated with the PFN was significantly better than those treated with DHS (p=0.037). However when we compared the stable and unstable fractures separately, we found that there was no significant difference in the outcomes of the stable fractures in the two groups (p=0.198).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We conclude that in stable intertrochanteric fractures, both the PFN and DHS have similar outcomes. However, in unstable intertrochanteric fractures the PFN has significantly better outcomes in terms of earlier restoration of walking ability as it is an intramedullary implant which can tolerate higher cylindrical loading when compared to DHS type of implants. In addition, as the PFN requires shorter operative time and smaller incision, it has distinct advantages over DHS even in stable intertrochanteric fractures. Hence, in our opinion, PFN may be the better fixation device for most intertrochanteric fractures.</p>

LONG VERSUS SHORT PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL IN THE MANAGEMENT OF UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES IN ELDERLY POPULATION

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-47
Author(s):  
Ravindra Prasad ◽  
L B Manjhi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Surgical Duration ◽  
Cephalomedullary Nails

INTRODUCTION: Intertrochanteric fractures constitute a vast majority of geriatric orthopedic trauma having highest postoperative morbidity and mortality of surgically treated fractures. Use of cephalomedullary nails for treatment of highly unstable intertrochanteric fractures is now more common as plate xation is associated with higher risk of implant breakage and screw cutout. However, choice of length of these nails remains surgeon dependent. AIM: to compare the functional outcome and complications associated with the use of Long and Short PFN for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTAtype 31A1 and 31A2) in elderly population. METHOD: A prospective interventional study comprising of 58 patients distributed in two groups in which one group (n=25) was treated with long PFN while other group (n=33) was operated with short PFN. Parameters compared between these two groups included demographic data, intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration as well as analysis of radiological and clinical progression of union and postoperative complications in the form of hip pain, anterior thigh pain and failure rate. Functional assessment was done using Harris hip score. RESULT:This study included only AO/OTAtype 31A1 and 31A2 fracture types in elderly patients above 60 years of age. We found no statistically signicant difference with regard to age, sex as well as fracture type among two groups. Long PFN group had a shorter union time (11.4 weeks) and was associated with lesser postoperative complication and failure rate as compared to short PFN. Also, functional outcome evaluated using Harris hip score shown better scores in long PFN group. However, intraoperative blood loss and surgical duration was found to be signicantly lesser in short PFN group. CONCLUSION: use of cephalomedullary nails either short or long for xation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures particularly AO/OTA type 31A1 and 31A2 provides good results. However, longer nails should be preferred over short nails as these are associated with less postoperative complication such as hip pain or anterior thigh pain owing to excessive curvature of femur in Indian population with lesser union time and better functional outcome as compared to short PFN. Shorter nails may be used in cases of sick and polytrauma patients where shorter operative time with minimal blood loss is desirable

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document