A study of bicolumnar plating in management of bicondylar tibial fracture

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
Dnyanesh Dattatray Patil ◽  
◽  
Sanjay Manohar Patil ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Fracture

scholarly journals Management and results in periprosthetic tibial fracture after total knee arthroplasty: Two-center 15-case retrospective series at 2 years’ follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-458
Author(s):  
Camille Bauer ◽  
Bogdan Zaharia ◽  
Florent Galliot ◽  
Jauffrey Parot ◽  
Fayçal Houfani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Tibial Fracture ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Patients with complex proximal tibial fractures overestimate the prognosis of their injury

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Keppler ◽  
Alexander Martin Keppler ◽  
Christoph Ihle ◽  
Philipp Minzlaff ◽  
Julian Fürmetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Tibial Fracture ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Physical Work ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Work Intensity ◽  
Proximal Tibial Fracture ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Patient Comprehension ◽  
Group B

Abstract Purpose To investigate, if patients with complex proximal tibial fracture have realistic expectations on open reduction and internal fixation. Methods 114 patients (mean 49 years, SD ± 13) with closed AO-type B and C proximal tibial fracture were grouped (group B, respectively C). Prior to surgery expectations concerning knee function, pain, return to work/sports, and the risk for osteoarthritis was assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSE) and a non-validated ten-item survey. Results 92% of patients expected at least an almost natural knee postoperatively. All items regarding restoring knee function were ranked to be at least important in both groups. 65% in group B and 47% in group C expected at most occasional pain. 83% in group B and 67% in group C expected full return to work without any limitations. Patients with low physical work intensity expected significantly shorter incapacity to work in both groups (7.8, respectively 8.9 weeks). 71% in group B and 60% in group C expected to return to sports with at most small limitations. 33% in group B and 22% in group C assumed risk for osteoarthritis will be prevented by surgery. Conclusion Expectations on surgery for complex proximal tibial fracture are high regardless of fracture type. The prognosis of many health and lifestyle domains was overestimated. The risk for osteoarthritis was underestimated. This study should sensitize surgeons to discuss realistic expectations. This may help to improve patient comprehension what leads to sensible expectations, resulting in improved patients´ satisfaction. Level of evidence IV. Trial registration number 14104, Date of registration: 06/2015.

scholarly journals Scoring systems for early prediction of tibial fracture non-union: an update

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George D. Chloros ◽  
Nikolaos K. Kanakaris ◽  
James S. H. Vun ◽  
Anthony Howard ◽  
Peter V. Giannoudis
Keyword(s):  
Tibial Fracture ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Level I ◽  
Healing Score ◽  
Tibial Shaft Fractures

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the available tibial fracture non-union prediction scores and to analyse their strengths, weaknesses, and limitations. Methods The first part consisted of a systematic method of locating the currently available clinico-radiological non-union prediction scores. The second part of the investigation consisted of comparing the validity of the non-union prediction scores in 15 patients with tibial shaft fractures randomly selected from a Level I trauma centre prospectively collected database who were treated with intramedullary nailing. Results Four scoring systems identified: The Leeds-Genoa Non-Union Index (LEG-NUI), the Non-Union Determination Score (NURD), the FRACTING score, and the Tibial Fracture Healing Score (TFHS). Patients demographics: Non-union group: five male patients, mean age 36.4 years (18–50); Union group: ten patients (8 males) with mean age 39.8 years (20–66). The following score thresholds were used to calculate positive and negative predictive values for non-union: FRACTING score ≥ 7 at the immediate post-operative period, LEG-NUI score ≥ 5 within 12 weeks, NURD score ≥ 9 at the immediate post-operative period, and TFHS < 3 at 12 weeks. For the FRACTING, LEG-NUI and NURD scores, the positive predictive values for the development of non-union were 80, 100, 40% respectively, whereas the negative predictive values were 60, 90 and 90%. The TFHS could not be retrospectively calculated for robust accuracy. Conclusion The LEG-NUI had the best combination of positive and negative predictive values for early identification of non-union. Based on this study, all currently available scores have inherent strengths and limitations. Several recommendations to improve future score designs are outlined herein to better tackle this devastating, and yet, unsolved problem.

scholarly journals Reamed intramedullary nailing versus circular frame external fixation for segmental tibial fractures (STIFF-F): a mixed methods feasibility study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline B. Hing ◽  
Elizabeth Tutton ◽  
Toby O. Smith ◽  
Molly Glaze ◽  
Jamie R. Stokes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Intramedullary Nailing ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Tibial Fracture ◽  
Tibial Fractures ◽  
Circular Frame ◽  
Pilot Rct ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background Segmental tibial fractures are fractures in two or more areas of the tibial diaphysis resulting in a separate intercalary segment of the bone. Surgical fixation is recommended for patients with segmental tibial fractures as non-operative treatment outcomes are poor. The most common surgical interventions are intramedullary nailing (IMN) and circular frame external fixation (CFEF), but evidence about which is better is of poor quality. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine optimum treatment is required. STIFF-F aimed to assess the feasibility of a multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF for segmental tibial fracture. Methods STIFF-F was a mixed-methods feasibility study comprising a pilot RCT conducted at six UK Major Trauma Centres, qualitative interviews drawing on Phenomenology and an online survey of rehabilitation. The primary outcome was recruitment rate. Patients, 16 years and over, with a segmental tibial fracture (open or closed) deemed suitable for IMN or CFEF were eligible to participate. Randomisation was stratified by site using random permuted blocks of varying sizes. Participant or assessor blinding was not possible. Interviews were undertaken with patients about their experience of injury, treatment, recovery and participation. Staff were interviewed to identify contextual factors affecting trial processes, their experience of recruitment and the treatment pathway. An online survey was developed to understand the rehabilitation context of the treatments. Results Eleven patients were screened and three recruited to the pilot RCT. Nineteen staff and four patients participated in interviews, and 11 physiotherapists responded to the survey. This study found the following: (i) segmental tibial fractures were rarer than anticipated, (ii) the complexity of the injury, study setup times and surgeon treatment preferences impeded recruitment, (iii) recovery from a segmental tibial fracture is challenging, and rehabilitation protocols are inconsistent and (iv) despite the difficulty recruiting, staff valued this research question and strived to find a way forward. Conclusion The proposed multicentre RCT comparing IMN with CFEF is not feasible. This study highlighted the difficulty of recruiting patients to an RCT of a complex rare injury over a short time period. Trial registration The study was registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number Registry: ISRCTN11229660

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document