Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly formulated vinyl polysiloxanether impression material with two different conventional elastomeric impression materials using two different impression techniques after disinfection- An in vitro study

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
Jayanti Kumari ◽  
◽  
Shahed Anwar Shaikh ◽  
Shaik Azmatulla ◽  
Pooja Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials

scholarly journals Evaluation and Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Newly Introduced Elastomeric Impression Material using 3D Laser Scanners: An in vitro Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen S Yadav ◽  
Teerthesh Jain ◽  
Amrita Pandita ◽  
SMA Feroz ◽  
Pradeep LNU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Laser Scanner ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Laser Scanners ◽  
Master Model

ABSTRACT Aim Aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate dimensional accuracy of newely introduced elastomeric impression material after repeated pours at different time intervals. Materials and methods In the present study a total of 20 (10 + 10) impressions of master model were made from vinyl polyether silicone and vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Each impression was repeatedly poured at 1, 24 hours and 14 days. Therefore, a total of 60 casts were obtained. Casts obtained were scanned with three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner and measurements were done. Results Vinyl polyether silicone produced overall undersized dies, with greatest change being 0.14% only after 14 days. Vinyl polysiloxane produced smaller dies after 1 and 24 hours and larger dies after 14 days, differing from master model by only 0.07% for the smallest die and to 0.02% for the largest die. Conclusion All the deviations measured from the master model with both the impression materials were within a clinically acceptable range. Clinical significance In a typical fixed prosthodontic treatment accuracy of prosthesis is critical as it determines the success, failure and the prognosis of treatment including abutments. This is mainly dependent upon fit of prosthesis which in turn is dependent on dimensional accuracy of dies, poured from elastomeric impressions. How to cite this article Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz SMA, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Newly Introduced Elastomeric Impression Material using 3D Laser Scanners: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):265-268.

scholarly journals Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-178
Author(s):  
Sunita Singh ◽  
Shabab A Khan ◽  
Nudrat Neyaz ◽  
Mishan Mohohar Jaiswal ◽  
Aditi S Tanwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Impression Materials

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on Accuracy and Reproducibility of Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone as an Impression Materials.

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Shakila Fatema ◽  
Sheikh Md Shahriar Quader ◽  
Mohammad Shamsuzzaman ◽  
Mirza Md Arifur Rahman ◽  
Nasima Khan
Keyword(s):  
Addition Reaction ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Horizontal Line ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Dimensional Changes ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Surface Detail

Background: To achieve accuracy and exact reproduction of prosthesis, choosing a perfect impression material is essential. Especially to make the prosthesis as accurately as possible, impression material should possess some essential properties, like; minimum dimensional changes, good flow ability and easy removal. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and surface detail reproduction of Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone as an impression materials. Method: This is an experimental in vitro study. In this study Impression by Alginate and Addition Reaction Silicone were made using a round stainless steel test block with three horizontal lines and two vertical lines. The horizontal lines were used for evaluating the surface detail reproduction, and vertical lines were provided for the dimensional accuracy. For dimensional accuracy the length of the middle horizontal line in between vertical lines and the distance between the top and bottom horizontal line was measured using travelling microscope. And for surface detail reproduction three horizontal line of one segment were observed under stereomicroscope. Result: According to study results Addition Reaction Silicone is better than Alginate regarding quality of impression. Conclusion: In comparison to Alginate, Addition Reaction Silicone might have better performance about accuracy and surface detail reproduction. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v3i2.17996 Update Dent. Coll. j: 2013; 3 (2): 28-33

Evaluation of Accuracy of Casts of Multiple Internal Connection Implant Prosthesis Obtained From Different Impression Materials and Techniques: An In Vitro Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malesh Pujari ◽  
Pooja Garg ◽  
D. R. Prithviraj
Keyword(s):  
Reference Model ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Internal Connection ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multiple Comparison Procedures

Movement of impression copings inside the impression material using a direct (open tray) impression technique during clinical and laboratory phases may cause inaccuracy in transferring the 3-dimensional spatial orientation of implants intraorally to the cast. Consequently, the prosthesis may require corrective procedures. This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy of 3 different impression techniques using polyether and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression material to obtain a precise cast for multiple internal connection implants. A reference acrylic resin model with 4 internal connection implants was fabricated. Impressions of the reference model were made using 3 different techniques and 2 different impression materials. The study consisted of 24 specimens divided into 6 groups of 4 each. Impressions were poured with ADA type IV stone (Kalrock, Kalabhai Karson Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India). All casts were evaluated for the positional accuracy (mm) of the implant replica heads using a profile projector. These measurements were compared to the measurements calculated on the reference resin model, which served as a control. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison procedures to evaluate group means. The results revealed significant difference for anterior implant distance between the 2 impression materials (P < .01) and also among the 3 different techniques (P < .05). The lowest mean variation was found with the polyether impression material and the splinted technique. For posterior implants, the results suggested no significant difference between the 2 impression materials (P ≥ .05). Although results were not statistically significant, the polyether impression material showed the lowest mean variation as compared to the VPS impression material. However, there was a significant difference among the 3 different techniques (P < .05). Among the 3 different techniques, the lowest mean variation between 2 posterior implants was found in the splinted technique. Casts obtained from impression techniques using square impression copings splinted together with autopolymerizing acrylic resin prior to the impression procedure were more accurate than casts obtained from impressions with nonmodified implant impression copings and with airborne particle–abraded, adhesive-coated copings. Casts obtained from polyether impression material were more accurate than casts obtained from vinyl polysiloxane impression material.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of retentive strength of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to custom tray using different tray adhesives: An In Vitro study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinsa P Devassy ◽  
Nishna Pradeep ◽  
A V Sreekumar ◽  
Jimmy George ◽  
Jittin James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Impression Material ◽  
Impression Materials

The retentive strength of the impression material to the impression tray is an important factor that can affect the quality of the final impression. Separation of the impression from the tray or tearing of the impression while removing from the mouth could be one of the reasons for distortion. It is imperative to know the most effective tray adhesive which can be used with different brands of rubber-based impression material. So, this study was directed to compare the different tray adhesives that can be effectively used in our day-to-day clinical practice. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document