Comparative study of temporalis fascia graft, tragal cartilage graft and fascia lata in tubotympanic type of CSOM

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
Sonali Uttamrao Landge ◽  
◽  
Prafful V Jatale ◽  
Vilas Kirdak ◽  
Sambhaji Chintale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Fascia Lata ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Fascia Graft

A Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascia Graft and Full Thickness Tragal Island Cartilage Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepakraj Venkatesan ◽  
Preethi Umamaheswaran ◽  
Ramkumar Vellikkannu ◽  
Senthil Kannan ◽  
Alagammai Sivaraman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty ◽  
Fascia Graft

scholarly journals Comparative study between fascia lata and temporalis fascia in myringoplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Ali Abdel Fattah ◽  
Abdel Hay Rashad Elasy ◽  
Ahmed Helmy Hoseini ◽  
Tarek Abdel Rahman Abdel Hafez
Keyword(s):  
Tympanic Membrane ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Fascia Lata ◽  
The Body ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Fascia Graft ◽  
Fascia Lata Graft ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Repair of a perforated tympanic membrane (myringoplasty) can facilitate normal middle ear function, resist infection, and help re-establish normal hearing. Autogenous graft materials are the most popular graft materials used in myringoplasty because of their easy acceptability by the body. This study is conducted to compare between temporalis fascia graft and fascia lata graft in myringoplasty for patients with tubo-tympanic dry perforation. Results A total of 60 patients with persistent dry tympanic membrane perforation were included in our study during the period from January 2018 to May 2020. Patients underwent myringoplasty with temporalis fascia (30 patients as group A) or fascia lata (30 patients as group B). Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits concerning graft status, ear discharge, and audiograms. The mean postoperative air-bone gap in group A was 17.5 ± 4 after 1 month and 8.6 ± 6.9 after 3 months, while in group B, the mean postoperative air-bone gap was 17.6 ± 4.9 after 1 month and 9.4 ± 7.5 after 3 months. There was 90% success in graft uptake in group A, while there was 80% success in group B. Conclusion Using temporalis fascia is still the best and most trustworthy technique of myringoplasty compared to fascia lata graft. However, fascia lata can be a good alternative to temporalis fascia especially in cases of revision myringoplasty, ears having large perforation, or near-total perforation where the chances of residual perforation are high because of the limited margin of remnant tympanic membrane overlapping the graft.

scholarly journals Comparison of Reinforcement Cartilage Graft and Temporalis Fascia Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-110
Author(s):  
Md Mainul Islam ◽  
Kanu Lal Saha ◽  
Harun Ar Rashid Talukder ◽  
Md Khalid Mahmud ◽  
Riashat Azim Majumder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tympanic Membrane ◽  
Middle Ear ◽  
Uptake Rate ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Hearing Gain ◽  
Type 1 Tympanoplasty ◽  
Fascia Graft ◽  
Cartilage Tympanoplasty

Background: Chronic otitis media (COM) is the long-standing infection of a part or whole of middle ear cleft characterized by ear discharge and perforation. It is the commonest ear problem in adult and children. Most common presenting symptoms are ear discharge, mild to severe hearing loss, sometimes tinnitus even vertigo. Treatment of COM is mainly operative. Inactive mucosal variety of COM presents with the perforation in tympanic membrane with non-inflamed middle ear mucosa. The treatment of inactive mucosal variety of COM is Type 1tympanoplasty. It can be done by conventional temporalis fascia or cartilage graft. Both have some merits and demerits. Objective: To compare the the outcomes between reinforcement cartilage graft and temporalis fascia graft in type -1 tympanoplasty. Methods: 86 (43 patients in each group) patients with COM (inactive mucosal) who were admitted in the department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from January 2018 to June 2019, and had fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for the study. History, examinations, investigations were done. All patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty. Prior to surgery relevant investigations were done and informed written consent was taken from all patients. In Group-A reinforcement cartilage tympanoplasty cases and in Group-B temporalis fascia tympanoplasty cases were placed. Post-operative graft uptake rate and hearing gain were compared in two groups Results: The surgical outcomes between reinforcement cartilage tympanoplasty in comparison with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty showed no significant difference of graft uptake rate and hearing gain. Conclusion: Cartilage tympanoplasty has been practised for reconstruction of perforated tympanic membrane in COM since long with variable results. Graft uptake rate in cartilage reinforcement is comparatively better than temporalis fascia graft. So, reinforcement cartilage graft can be adopted as an alternative to temporalis fascia graft in type- I tympanoplasty. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 27(2): 104-110

scholarly journals MYRINGOPLASTY, TEMPORALIS FASCIA GRAFT PLACED MEDIAL TO THE MALLEUS VERSUS LATERAL TO THE MALLEUS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (81) ◽  
pp. 6052-6056
Author(s):  
Shobhan Babu A ◽  
Ranganathswamy D ◽  
Shankar T ◽  
Vivechana T ◽  
Sandeep R
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Fascia Graft

scholarly journals Comparative study of temporalis fascia graft versus cartilage shield tympanoplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 951
Author(s):  
Gaurav Chhabra ◽  
Amresh K. Saxena ◽  
Sanjay Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Uptake Rate ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Fascia Graft ◽  
Uptake Rates ◽  
Group A ◽  
Subtotal Perforation ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Comparative Study

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to demonstrate the comparative study in terms of graft uptake rate &amp; hearing gain between cartilage shield tympanoplasty and temporalis fascia tympanoplasty in patients with moderate/ large/subtotal perforation.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Cartilage shield tympanoplasty and temporalis fascia tympanoplasty were conducted in Group A and Group B, respectively, each containing 30 patients with moderate/large/subtotal perforations. Pure tone audiogram (PTA) was performed preoperatively and at postoperative visit i.e. at 12<sup>th</sup> month, a greater than 10-dB closure of air bone gap (ABG) was considered significant.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The graft uptake rates were 93.33% and 86.67% in Group A and Group B, respectively, at the end of 10th week. In total, 90% in Group A and 88% in Group B had significant improvement in hearing (ABG ≥10 dB) at 12th week of surgery.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Conchal cartilage is a possible graft material for cartilage shield tympanoplasty, especially in moderate, large &amp; subtotal perforation, as it is showed superior autograft as compared to temporalis fascia, not only because of better graft uptake rate and less partial failure but also due to the comparable hearing improvement in terms of mean AB gap in both types of graft materials.</p>

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TYMPANOPLASTY WITH CONVENTIONAL TEMPORALIS FASCIA GRAFT VERSUS TRAGAL CARTILAGE PERICHONDRIUM GRAFT

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Apurba Sarkar ◽  
Debabrata Das ◽  
Anurag Pradhan ◽  
Sk Nawazur Rahaman ◽  
arjuman Parveen
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Composite Graft ◽  
Cartilage Graft ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Fascia Graft ◽  
The Mean

The study was carried out on 50 patients with central perforation in tympanic membrane ( dry & inactive stage ). The study was done in the department of OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGYof BURDWAN MEDICALCOLLEGE AND HOSPITALover a period of one year. The study was done on comparison between tympanoplasty procedure using temporalis fascia as graft versus cartilage composite graft. Precise history was taken from respective patients in detail and were examined clinically. Patients with dry perforation with good cochlear reserve, intact and mobile ossicular chain, functioning Eustachian tube were selected randomly for the operation. Tympanoplasty procedure using temporalis fascia as graft was done in 50% (n=25) patients and tympanoplasty procedure using cartilage composite graft was done in 50% (n=25) patients. In this study the age range of patients were from 13 to 50 years, the mean age was 26.62 years, the number of male and female was equal. Right sided disease was predominant in our study and the mean duration of symptom was 11.24 months. The mean pre-operative hearing loss (pure tone average by pure tone audiometry) was 37.84 ± 4.65 dB and mean pre operative airbone gap was 22.84 ± 4.65 dB . Post operative Mean air conduction was 23.48 ± 5.54 dB among them 24.2 ± 6.26 dB in the fascial group and 22.76 ± 4.73 dB in the cartilage group. This result is not statistically signicant. Post operative mean air-bone gap was 13.84 ± 5.94 dB among them 14.76 ± 5.6 dB in fascial group and 12.92 ± 6.23 dB in the cartilage group which is not signicant stastistically. Successful graft take-up rate of 88.00% (n=44). The overall success rate among tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia graft( GROUP A ) and tympanoplasty using composite cartilage graft ( GROUP B ) technique were 84.00% (n=21) and 92.00% (n=23) respectively. 12.00% (n=6) patients were marked as failure cases during postoperative follow up period. The overall failure rate among tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia graft( GROUPA) and tympanoplasty using composite cartilage graft ( GROUPB ) technique were 16.00% (n=4) and 8.00% (n=2) respectively. So the distribution of surgical outcome in terms of success rate or failure rate was statistically insignicant in the two study groups (p= 0.384). So the distribution of surgical outcome in terms of success rate or failure rate cartilage composite graft gives a denitely better result than temporalis fascia graft. However, the two method did not differ signicantly in terms of hearing improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document