A comparative study of conventional septoplasty with endoscopic septoplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 08-10
Author(s):  
B Hari Krishna Kishore ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Apar Pokharel ◽  
Naganawalachullu Jaya Prakash Mayya ◽  
Nabin Gautam

Introduction: Deviated nasal septum is one of the most common causes for the nasal obstruction. The objective of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes in patients undergoing conventional septoplasty and endoscopic septoplasty in the management of deviated nasal septum. Methods:  Prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 patients who presented to the Department of ENT, College of Medical sciences, during a period of one year. The severity of the symptoms was subjectively assessed using NOSE score and objectively assessed using modified Gertner plate. Results: There was significant improvement in functional outcome like NOSE Score and area over the Gertner plate among patients who underwent endoscopic septoplasty. Significant difference in incidence of post-operative nasal synechae and haemorrhage was seen in conventional group compared to endoscopic group. Conclusions: Endoscopic surgery is an evolutionary step towards solving the problems related to deviated nasal septum. It is safe, effective and conservative, alternative to conventional septal surgery.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (47) ◽  
pp. 8184-8189
Author(s):  
Kapil Kumar Singh ◽  
Isha Sinha ◽  
Prerna Verma ◽  
Ganesh Singh

Author(s):  
Kiran A. Deshmukh ◽  
Rashmi T. Ambiger

<p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Background: </span></strong>The aim of the study was to study the advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic septoplasty and conventional septoplasty and to co-relate the two procedures in terms of intra-operative visualization, duration of surgery, procedural difficulties, hospital stay and complications.</p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Methods: </span></strong>It is a prospective study done during November 2017 to April 2019 on 50 patients with symptomatic deviated nasal septum. Patients were randomly divided into conventional septoplasty and endoscopic septoplasty groups of 25 each. Surgery was performed as according to the division. Followed up on 1st week, 15th day, 1st month and 3rd month.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Results: </span></strong>In endoscopic septoplasty group, septal pathology, precise correction of the pathology, with less complications were seen. Hospital stay and duration of surgery were significantly less in endoscopic group.</p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Conclusions: </span></strong>For minimal and posterior deviations of the septum, endoscopic septoplasty is better, whereas for anterior deviations, conventional septoplasty could be better choice.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (44) ◽  
pp. 3080-3083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rambabu P ◽  
Surya Prakasa Rao S ◽  
Leela Prasad T ◽  
Chanakya K.S.R

Author(s):  
Abhinav Srivastava ◽  
Akanksha Yadav

ABSTRACT Nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum (DNS) is a common problem encountered by otolaryngologists. A variety of surgical procedures have been tried in the treatment of the same. This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes and complications of endoscopic and conventional septoplasty. This prospective, randomized study was conducted on 50 patients with symptomatic DNS, 25 of whom underwent conventional septoplasty, and the rest underwent endoscopic septoplasty. It was found that it is easier to correct posterior deviations and isolated spurs with endoscopic septoplasty with less complications and good results. How to cite this article Yadav A, Mohan C, Srivastava A. Comparative Study of Endoscopic Septoplasty vs Conventional Septoplasty. Int J Adv Integ Med Sci 2016;1(2):49-51.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Soumen Biswas ◽  
Bijoy Krishna Bhadra ◽  
Debarshi Jana

Endoscopic septoplasty is a new technique with certain advantages compared to the conventional headlight technique. With butter visibility of the nasal cavity, lesser injury to the surrounding structures and better patient tolerability and hospital stay, endoscopic technique is an effective alternate to the conventional technique. To evaluate and compare the two techniques we conducted a prospective randomized study with 30 patients in each group. Detailed clinical examination and DNE was done prior to the surgery. And patients were given NOSE questionnaire to record the severity of symptoms. And after the surgery patients were followed up for 3 months. At the end of 3 months post-operative DNE was done and NOS a questionnaire was given to the patients to record the relief of symptoms. In this way We compared the disease from both subjective and objective perspectives. There was significant less postoperative hospital stay in endoscopic group and it was a longer procedure compared to conventional septoplasty. Posterior and high septal deviations were better treated with endoscopic septoplasty. Since it is done with a digital monitor system it is an effective tool in teaching.


2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Sathyaki ◽  
Chary Geetha ◽  
G. B. Munishwara ◽  
M. Mohan ◽  
K. Manjuanth

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document