A prospective comparative evaluation of gabapentin vs pregabaline for the acute post-operative pain management in lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-06
Author(s):  
S Ch Sai Ramakrishna ◽  
◽  
Chhavi Agarwal ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Other Regarding ◽  
Ramsay Sedation Score

Background: Pre emptive analgesia is multimodal approach where drug is used before surgery and has potential to be more effective than a similar analgesic treatment initiated after surgery. Pregabaline and Gabapentin are GABA analogue used is used as pre-emptive analgesic. Its analgesic action is mediated through α2δ subunit of voltage gated calcium channels on dorsal horn neurons. Material and Method:96 patients satisfying selection criteria were enrolled for this study and divided in to three groups Group P, Group G and Group C each having 32 patients. All patients were explained about visual analogue score. Result: There is significant difference between three groups regarding time of first rescue analgesia and tramadol consumption. The mean time for rescue analgesia was longer in pregabaline group then gabapentin group (482.7±113.5 min vs 343.35±70.74 min). The mean amount of dose of tramadol requirement was also less in pregabaline and gabapentin group (164.32±39.41 vs178.32±48.21 vs 272.82±83.01) in comparison control. Conclusion: The VAS score was significantly higher in control then pregabaline and gabapentin group. Both pregabaline (group P) and gabapentin (group G) are comparable to each other regarding VAS score at different time interval in post operative period. Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher in pregabaline and gabapentin group up 4 hour post operatively but after that there was no significant difference between two groups. Both pregabaline (group P) and gabapentin (group G) are comparable to each other regarding Ramsay sedation score at different time interval in post operative period.

scholarly journals Comparitive evaluation of different concentrations of alcohol in ultrasound guided coeliac plexus neurolysis for pain relief in upper abdominal malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-500
Author(s):  
Manish Kumar Singh ◽  
Pragya Verma ◽  
Sarita Singh ◽  
Gyan P Singh ◽  
Hemlata Verma
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Upper Abdominal

Patients suffering from advanced upper abdominal malignancies have pain as predominant symptom affects their quality of life and survival. USG guided coeliac plexus neurolysis become benevolence in these patients on part of their pain management and quality of life improvement. To compare the efficacy of USG guided coeliac plexus neurolysis for pain relief in upper abdominal malignancies by using different concentration of alcohol (50% vs 75%).This Prospective, comparative, randomised double blinded study was conducted during Sep 2019 – Aug 2020 at our tertiary care centre. Total 60 cases were taken as per following inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly divided into 2 groups i.e. 30 each group, we compare Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, quality of life (QOL) and need of rescue analgesia profile between the groups to know the efficacy of USG guided coeliac plexus block. In our study, we observed that the baseline mean VAS score in group I was 8.26±0.78 while in group II was 8.03±0.76. No significant difference was found in mean VAS score at this time between the groups (p=0.24). The baseline mean QOL score in group-I was 77.46±3.40 while for the cases of group II the mean QOL score was 77.36±3.33. No significant difference was found in mean QOL score at baseline between the groups (p=0.90). The baseline mean morphine consumption in group-I was 113.33±39.24 mg while for the cases of group-II the mean morphine consumption was 120.33±38.37mg. No significant difference was found in mean morphine consumption at this time between the groups (p=0.48).Both groups having 50% alcohol and 75% alcohol decreases the VAS score from baseline in patients having upper abdominal malignancies along with QOL and dosages of rescue analgesia whereas no significant difference in VAS score in patients of both groups.

scholarly journals Effects of preoperative gabapentin on postoperative relief of pain in patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1055
Author(s):  
Ritu Masar ◽  
Kishore Kumar Arora
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Time Required

Background: To evaluate the effects of preoperative Gabapentin on postoperative relief of pain in patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia. Post-operative ward and OT Department of Anaesthesia, JAH, GR Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.Methods: The sixty patients subjected to ASA grade I and II posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomized into 2 groups. One and half hour before surgery, Gabapentin 600 mg and placebo was given blindly to selected patients for the study. The postoperative pain was assessed with visual analogue score. Pain and side effects assessment were performed.Results: Total 60 patients of ASA grade I and II posted for elective surgeries under GA were randomized into 2 groups. One and half hour before surgery, the drug selected for the study was given blindly with a sip of water. The mean (±SD) of VAS score was 5.86±0.34 in Group B and 5.10±0.84 in Group A. VAS score was significantly lower in Group A. With oral Gabapentin time required for rescue analgesia is delayed as compared to control group. The mean (±SD) TRA-1 was 38.40±24.61 in Group B and 44.03±8.94 in Group A.Conclusions: Preoperative oral Gabapentin significantly decreases the severity of pain postoperatively as compared to placebo in patients posted for surgery. Time for analgesic requirement is more with oral Gabapentin. The VAS score was lower in Gabapentin group.

Efficacy of Pregabalin as preemptive analgesic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1166-1170
Author(s):  
Ajay Singh Thapa ◽  
Rajesh K Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Preemptive Analgesia ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ramsay Sedation Score

Introduction: Different pharmacological approach for preemptive analgesia have been tried with varying degree of success. Preemptive analgesia results in decrease in postoperative opioid requirement and hence decreases opioid related complication. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate pregabalin as preemptive analgesic in scheduled cases. Methodology: Fourty ASA I and II  patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were divided into two groups of twenty. Group A received pregabalin 300 mg, two hours before induction of anesthesia but group B were not given any medication. Postoperative VAS Score, Ramsay Sedation Score, postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative opioid requirement in two groups were observed over 48 hours and noted.Results: The mean VAS scores were  higher in control group whereas the mean Ramsay score was higher in group pregabalin in the first six hours in the post operative period which was statistically significant. The mean Ramsay sedation score was same (2) in both the group after twelve post operative period. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower in the pregabalin group. Requirement of post operative analgesia was higher in the control group. Conclusion: Preemptive use of Pregabalindecreasespostoperateive pain, postoperative opioid requirement and increases postoperative sedation.

scholarly journals Comparitive evaluation of different concentrations of alcohol in ultrasound guided coeliac plexus neurolysis for pain relief in upper abdominal malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-500
Author(s):  
Manish Kumar Singh ◽  
Pragya Verma ◽  
Sarita Singh ◽  
Gyan P Singh ◽  
Hemlata Verma
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Upper Abdominal

Patients suffering from advanced upper abdominal malignancies have pain as predominant symptom affects their quality of life and survival. USG guided coeliac plexus neurolysis become benevolence in these patients on part of their pain management and quality of life improvement. To compare the efficacy of USG guided coeliac plexus neurolysis for pain relief in upper abdominal malignancies by using different concentration of alcohol (50% vs 75%).This Prospective, comparative, randomised double blinded study was conducted during Sep 2019 – Aug 2020 at our tertiary care centre. Total 60 cases were taken as per following inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomly divided into 2 groups i.e. 30 each group, we compare Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, quality of life (QOL) and need of rescue analgesia profile between the groups to know the efficacy of USG guided coeliac plexus block. In our study, we observed that the baseline mean VAS score in group I was 8.26±0.78 while in group II was 8.03±0.76. No significant difference was found in mean VAS score at this time between the groups (p=0.24). The baseline mean QOL score in group-I was 77.46±3.40 while for the cases of group II the mean QOL score was 77.36±3.33. No significant difference was found in mean QOL score at baseline between the groups (p=0.90). The baseline mean morphine consumption in group-I was 113.33±39.24 mg while for the cases of group-II the mean morphine consumption was 120.33±38.37mg. No significant difference was found in mean morphine consumption at this time between the groups (p=0.48).Both groups having 50% alcohol and 75% alcohol decreases the VAS score from baseline in patients having upper abdominal malignancies along with QOL and dosages of rescue analgesia whereas no significant difference in VAS score in patients of both groups.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Nabufen and Sufentanil in the Prevention of Visceral Pain After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Gu ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Huihua Liao ◽  
Jian Mo ◽  
Weiming Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D ◽  
Ramsay Sedation Score

Abstract Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of different compatibility schemes in the prevention of visceral pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods: from April 2019 to April 2020, patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into four groups: group A: sufentanil 3 μ g / kg; group B: low-dose nalbuphine group: 0.1 mg / kg of nabufen + 3 μ g / kg of sufentanil; group C: medium dose of nabufen group: 1 mg / kg of nabufen + 2 μ g / kg of sufentanil; group D: high-dose nabufen 2 There were 30 cases in each group. The degree of pain and the number of adverse reactions at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were observed and recorded. The number and dosage of morphine used as a remedial analgesic were recorded. The pain degree was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). The total amount of analgesic pump used, the total number of times of pressing and the effective times of pressing were recorded. The adverse reactions included respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, drowsiness, restlessness and skin The skin itches. Results: the analgesic effect of group B was similar to that of group A, and there was no significant difference in the number of invalid pressing, total pressing times and rescue analgesia rate (P > 0.05), while the invalid pressing times, total pressing times and remedial analgesia rate of group C and group D were significantly lower than those of group A (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between group C and group D in the number of invalid compressions, the total number of compressions and the rate of remedial analgesia (P > 0.05), suggesting that increasing the dose of nalbuphine could not significantly increase the analgesic effect. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, skin pruritus, lethargy and Ramsay Sedation score in group B and group C were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). Ramsay Sedation score and incidence of drowsiness were lower than those in group D, which indicated that the incidence of adverse reactions was higher in group D than group B and group C.Conclusion: the combination of 1 mg / kg nabufen and 2 μ g / kg sufentanil is a safe and effective combination scheme for the prevention of visceral pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery with small adverse reactions.Trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=40635Registration number：ChiCTR1900025076 . Prospectively registered on 10 August 2019.

scholarly journals Comparison Of Medial Arch-Supporting Insoles And Heel Pads In The Treatment Of Plantar Fasciitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melih Malkoc ◽  
Ozgur Korkmaz ◽  
Adnan Kara ◽  
Ismail Oltulu ◽  
Ferhat Say
Keyword(s):  
Daily Activity ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Sporting Activity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACTPlantar fasciitis is a disorder caused by inflammation of the insertion point of the plantar fascia over the medial tubercle of the calcaneus. Foot orthotics are used to treat plantar fasciitis. Heel pads medialise the centre of force, whereas medial arch supporting insoles lateralise the force. We assessed the clinical results of the treatment of plantar fasciitis with silicone heel pads and medial arch-supported silicone insoles.We retrospectively reviewed 75 patients with heel pain. A total of 35 patients in the first group were treated with medial arch supporting insoles, and 40 patients in the second group were treated with heel pads. The patients were evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) at the first and last examinations.The mean VAS score in the first group was 8.6±1,2 (6-10); the FAAM daily activity score was 66.2±16 (41.2-95.0), and the sporting activity score was 45.4±24,4 (0.1-81) before treatment. At the last follow-up in this group, the mean VAS score was 5.3±1,5 (0-9); the FAAM daily activity score was 83,0±15,1 (55,9-100), and the sporting activity score was 73,5±26,2 (25-100). The mean VAS score in the second group was 8,6±0,9 (7-10); the FAAM daily activity score was 66.4±17 (41.4-95.2), and the sporting activity score was 45.8±24,2 (0.8-81, 3) before the treatment. At the last follow-up in this group, the mean VAS score was 5.5±1,2 (0-9); the FAAM daily activity score was 83.4±14,9 (60, 2-100), and the sporting activity score was 73.8±26 (28-100).There was no significant difference in the clinical results of both groups. The force distribution by the use of silicone heel pads and medial arch-supported silicone insoles had no effect on the clinical results of the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

scholarly journals Management of mal-united Pilon fractures with joint-sparing osteotomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0052
Author(s):  
Guang-rong Yu
Keyword(s):  
Type Ii ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Aofas Score ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Articular Surfaces ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic ◽  
Time From Injury ◽  
Pilon Fractures

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: To explore the effectiveness and operative methods to treat various mal-united Pilon fractures with joint-sparing osteotomy. Methods: Between January 2011 and October 2016, 21 patients with mal-united Pilon fractures were treated with joint-sparing osteotomy. There were 13 males and 8 females with an average age of 38.4 years (range, 22-48 years). 14 were left feet and 7, right. The time from injury to reconstructive operation was 4 months to 10 years. 17 received operative treatment previously, and 4 were treated by plaster fixation. According to Rüedi-Allgöwer classification, 16 were rated as type II (including 6 medial Pilon fractures, 5 anterior, 5 posterior) and 5, type III. All patients received standardized postoperative managements. Results: All patients were followed up for more than 1 year. All the fractures were reunited in an average time of 13.8 weeks (range 9 to 18 weeks). The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 2.42 (range 0 to 5) and the mean ankle and hindfoot scale of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 78.81(range 65 to 92) 6 months after operation. The VAS score was 5.27 (range 2 to 7) and the AOFAS score was 57.26 (range 20 to 81) before. Comparing to preoperative data, statistically significant difference was found postoperatively (P<0.05). Conclusion: Results by joint-sparing osteotomy to realign and reconstruct articular surfaces of ankles are acceptable. Functions and symptoms are improved significantly after operation. Joint-sparing osteotomy can be a considerable option for treating mal-united Pilon fractures.

scholarly journals Efficacy of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane block in post operative analgesia requirement in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 925
Author(s):  
Hanuman Ram Khoja ◽  
Dhanush Kumar Kunchagi ◽  
Praveen Kumar Joshi ◽  
Prabha Om
Keyword(s):  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Analgesia Requirement ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Minimal invasive surgery has many advantages. In order to maintain and control  pain, one of the most effective technique is Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block technique. Aim of the study was to demonstrate the efficacy of laparoscopic guided transversus abdominis plane block in post-operative analgesia requirement in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: It was a hospital based prospective interventional study. Sample size was calculated at 0.05 α error and 80% study power assuming mean difference of VAS score between TAP block +/A group  and TAP block- /B group is 1 and standard deviation of VAS score 1.3 among patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age of group A was 48.56 years and for group B was 43.53 years. In group A 80% patients were females and for group B 83.3% patients were females. There was significant difference in VAS score at immediate post operation, at 1 hour, at 6 hours, at 18 hours and at 24 hours as p value was <0.0001 for all these groups. The mean VAS score was recorded less in group A at all the time duration compared to group B.Conclusions: With advantages like maximum safety, efficacy, potential for lower visceral injury risk and shorter operational time and other numerous advantages (decreased analgesic requirements, etc.)  laparoscopic-guided TAP block counts as an ideal abdominal field block in the patients.

P91 Post-operative pain in neurosurgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. e46.1-e46
Author(s):  
PM Haigh ◽  
F Al-Hatimi ◽  
H Stewart ◽  
S Rajagopal ◽  
S Khalifa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Foramen Magnum ◽  
P Value ◽  
Inflammatory Agent ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Post Operative Period ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

ObjectivesAre the analgesic guidelines for those neurosurgical operations associated with major and complex major pain consistently followed? Is there a correlation between adherence and post-operative pain?DesignPatients undergoing spinal surgery and foramen magnum decompressions were visited on the first post-operative day (D1). They provided their pain score subjectively (0=nil; 10=worst ever experienced); objectively we recorded whether they could move in/out of bed without pain limitation.Subjectsn=57 consecutive patients undergoing elective major and complex major pain neurosurgery between April and June 2018 at the NHNN, Queen Square.MethodsA proforma was completed on D1. The patients consented to take part and answered three questions. We examined what (if any) analgesics they were admitted on, and what had been prescribed to cover the post-operative period. This was compared against the appropriate guideline for that category of operation.ResultsGuidelines were only followed in 16/57 (28.1%) cases; not followed in 41/57 (71.9%). On an unpaired T-test: 2-tailed P value=0.0195. Where guidelines were followed, the mean pain score reported was: 3.75 (SD 2.72) Where not followed, the mean pain score was 5.46 (SD 2.29). So with a 95% confidence interval −3.41 to −0.29, there is a significant difference between the pain in those prescribed according to the guidelines and those that were not.ConclusionsThe pain guidelines are not routinely followed. Most commonly this was due to no prescription for a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent. We suggest regular sessions of education of the guidelines. Cycle 2 closed the loop of the audit. We re-reviewed adherence and pain scores and found guidelines were followed in 34% of cases, which represented a 6% improvement. On a paired two-tailed P value=0.0794. The mean pain score where guidelines were followed=3.42 (SD1.62) against a mean=4.74 (SD 1.89) where guidelines were not followed.

Preoperative Gabapentin Administration and Its Impact on Postoperative Opioid Requirement and Pain in Sinonasal Surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 019459982095280
Author(s):  
Amarbir S. Gill ◽  
Farrukh R. Virani ◽  
Joshua C. Hwang ◽  
Machelle D. Wilson ◽  
Angela M. Beliveau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Sinonasal Outcome Test ◽  
The Mean

Objective To determine the efficacy of preoperative gabapentin on patient-reported pain levels and postoperative opioid requirements following sinonasal surgery. Study Design Retrospective review. Setting Academic institution. Methods Patients undergoing sinonasal surgery between July 2019 and January 2020 were followed. Groups were divided into those that received 600 mg of oral gabapentin 1 hour preoperatively (gabapentin) and those that did not (control). Postoperatively, each patient was counseled to use acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and oxycodone as needed for pain control. Patients completed a daily postoperative pain and medication log. Pain was measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) and opioid use by morphine equivalent dose (MED). Chi-square test and Wilcoxon test were used for data analysis. Results Fifty-seven patients were included (control, n = 28; gabapentin, n = 29). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or baseline Sinonasal Outcome Test–22 scores between the groups. The total MED, postoperative day (POD) 1-2 MED, POD 3-4 MED, and POD 5-6 MED did not differ significantly between the control (17.9, 12.2, 4.6, 1.5) and gabapentin (19.0, 8.9, 7.2, 3.5) groups ( P = .98, .25, .16, .44). The mean daily VAS score did not differ significantly between the control (3.1) and gabapentin (2.8) groups ( P = .81). The mean daily VAS score decreased significantly in both groups with each successive POD ( P = .004). Conclusion Preoperative gabapentin did not significantly reduce postoperative pain or opioid use. Postoperative discomfort following sinonasal surgery is mild, and opioid intake is minimal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document