Comparative study of postoperative analgesia intrathecal addition of fentanyl versus clonidine in lower limb surgeries

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
Palak Gupta ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Anesthetic Drugs ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Background: Local anesthetic drugs like bupivacaine are commonly used in spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries but the duration of spinal anaesthesia is very short. However, the duration of action of bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia can be prolonged by using adjuvants such as midazolam, opioids, neostigmine, dexmedetomidine and clonidine. The present study is being undertaken to evaluate and compare the effects of clonidine and fentanyl as intrathecal adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery. Material and Methods: Present study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Government Medical College, Jammu in patients of either sex ranging in age from 20-60 years belonging to ASA I/ II scheduled for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. 90 patients were randomly allocated in three groups of 30 each in order to compare the duration and quality of analgesia of clonidine and fentanyl used as adjuvants to intrathecal bupivacaine. Results: All the three groups were comparable in age, gender, height, weight, ASA grade distribution and the difference between them was not statistically significant. The difference between the time to reach the T10 block, mean time taken for first request for analgesia and duration of motor block in all three groups were found out to be statistically significant (p<0.0001). It was found that group with clonidine had better results than fentanyl and bupivacaine alone. In our study 1 patient in bupivacaine (15mg) with fentanyl (25µg) group and 2 patients in clonidine(37.5ugm) group had hypotension but the difference was statistically insignificant. Only 1 patient in each fentanyl and clonidine group had 1 episode of bradycardia but no patient in bupivacaine alone group had bradycardia and the difference was also insignificant. Postoperative vomiting was experienced by 3.33% of patients receiving Bupivacaine (15mg) with fentanyl (25µg) and it was treated by giving injection Ondansetron 4 mg i/v whereas no case was reported in clonidine group. This difference was statistically insignificant. 2 patients in bupivacaine (15mg) with fentanyl (25µg) group had itching but no such case was reported in clonidine group and the difference was also statistically insignificant. No respiratory depression, nausea was noted in study patients. Conclusion: It can be concluded that intrathecal clonidine (37.5ugm) provides quicker onset and prolonged duration of sensory and motor blocks simultaneously increasing the duration of analgesia when compared to fentanyl (25ugm).

COMPARISONS OF EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DOSES OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS ADDITIVE IN INTRATHECAL BLOCKADE WITH 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN LOWER LIMB ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
pp. 21-23
Author(s):  
Shantanu Hazra ◽  
Debabanhi Barua ◽  
Sudeshna Mondal ◽  
Arpita Laha
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Stable Conditions ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group D

INTRODUCTION Lower limb surgeries may be performed under local, regional (spinal or epidural) or general anaesthesia, but neuraxial blockade is the preferred mode of anaesthesia. Spinal block is still therst choice because of its rapid onset, superior blockade, low risk of infection as from catheter in situ, 1 less failure rates and cost-effectiveness. Intrathecal local anaesthesia alone is associated with relatively short duration of action and thus early analgesic intervention is needed in post-operative period. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES With use of dexmedetomidine in 3 different graded doses with hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally as regional anaesthesia for lower limb surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY This Prospective double blinded randomized controlled study. The study will be conducted in adult patients aged between 18-50 years undergoing lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia in orthopedic OT, dept. of Anaethesiology, Medical college & hospital, Kolkata. Duration of the study One year (9 months for data collection & 3 months for data analysis, review& report writing). Total 63 patients in our study. RESULTS We found the mean of two segment regression time from highest sensory level in Group B was 130.56min; in group C was 171.34min; ingroup D was 217.85min So, block regression was signicantly slower with the addition of intrathecal dexmedetomidine (Group D) as compared to group C & B ( P < 0.0001) The mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level for Group Bwas 289.43 min ( SD- 12.43) For Group C, the mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was 402.71 min ( SD- 28.60) For Group D, the mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was 584.43min ( SD- 38.92) Overall the mean regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was 425.52 min ( SD- 125.71) The sensory regression time to S1 from highest sensory level was signicantly higher with increasing dose of dexmedetomidine i. e. D>C>B . (P< 0.0001). CONCLUSION We recommend the use of 10mcg of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine as it seems to be a good alternative to other additives for long duration surgical procedures due to its profound intrathecal anesthetic and analgesic properties. It provides good quality of intraoperative analgesia, thermodynamically stable conditions, minimal side effects, and excellent quality of postoperative analgesia.

scholarly journals Effects of Combination of Intrathecal Fentanyl Clonidine with Bupivacaine in Patients for Operative Knee Arthroscopic Procedure

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Meenoti Pramod Potdar ◽  
Laxmi Laxman Kamat ◽  
Manjeet Prakash Save ◽  
Tanya R Jha
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Fentanyl Citrate ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Additional Advantage ◽  
Arthroscopic Procedure ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

ABSTRACT Introduction The addition of neuraxial fentanyl or clonidine potentiates the effect of local anesthetic and increases the duration of action and quality of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. We decided to conduct this study to analyze the synergistic effect of clonidine and fentanyl with bupivacaine on the duration of analgesia surgies. The primary aim is to determine the duration of analgesia for a combination of intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl with bupivacaine in knee arthroscopic surgeries. Materials and methods We included 100 patients undergoing operative arthroscopio procedure and randomly allocated the patients into four different groups of 25 each. Group S: 15 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 1.0 mL normal saline (NS). Group F: 15 mg 0.5% HB with 25 μcg fentanyl citrate and 0.5 mL NS. Group C: 15 mg 0.5% HB with 75 μcg clonidine and 0.5 mL NS. Group FC: 15 mg 0.5% HB with 25 μcg fentanyl citrate and 75 μcg clonidine. All the patients received the spinal dosage of 4 mL. Results The duration of spinal analgesia was greatest in group FC (458.4 ± 179.96 minutes, p-value 0.001). The rescue analgesic requirement in 24 hours was significantly less in group FC, and the incidence of side effects was comparable. Conclusion The combination of clonidine and fentanyl with bupivacaine intrathecally does augment its sensory, motor, and analgesic action further, and hence it has an additional advantage with similar side effects. How to cite this article Potdar MP, Kamat LL, Save MP, Jha TR. Effects of Combination of Intrathecal Fentanyl Clonidine with Bupivacaine in Patients for Operative Knee Arthroscopic Procedure. Res Inno in Anesth 2016;1(2):52-57.

scholarly journals A comparison of epidural analgesia provided by Bupivacaine plus Pethidine, Bupivacaine plus Morphine, or Bupivacaine plus Morphine plus Midazolam for lower limb orthopaedic surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-121
Author(s):  
Nil Raj Sharma ◽  
Pradip Timalsena ◽  
Sundip DC
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Epidural Morphine ◽  
P Value ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in orthopaedic surgeries helps to prevent thromboembolic phenomenon by increasing venodynamics. Adequate post-operative analgesia with good patient satisfaction has been observed with this technique. Objective: To assess the duration of postoperative analgesia and complications in patients receiving epidural anaesthesia with Morphine, Midazolam and Pethidine in combination with Bupivacaine. Methods: We prospectively studied 75 patients who were scheduled for elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery with epidural anaesthesia at Lumbini Medical College, Palpa from 2010 March to 2012 March. They were randomly divided by lottery method into three equal groups. Group ‘A’ (BP) received 50 mg epidural Pethidine (3 ml) with 13 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine. Group ‘B’ (BM) received 5 mg (3 ml) epidural Morphine with 13 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine and Group ‘C’ (BMM) received 5 mg (1 ml) epidural Morphine with 13 ml 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2 mg (2 ml) epidural Midazolam. All the patients were observed for 24 hours for quality of analgesia and other side effects like nausea, vomiting and pruritus. Data were analysed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS-16) software. Results: The result of the study shows the duration of analgesia was prolonged in BM group than BP group and even more so in BMM group (p value <0.001). Incidence of nausea and vomiting in BMM group was lower than in BP and BM group but statistically the difference was not significant (p value: 0.489). Pruritus was absent in BP group, less in BMM group while significantly higher in BM group. Conclusion: The use of epidural Morphine and Midazolam in combination with Bupivacaine is the satisfactory method of post operative analgesia. When Midazolam is added, duration of analgesia can be increased with decrease in incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus.Journal of Kathmandu Medical College Vol. 2, No. 3, Issue 5, Jul.-Sep., 2013 Page: 117-121DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v2i3.9961Uploaded date : 3/4/2014

scholarly journals The Sprotte Needle and Post Dural Puncture Headache following Caesarean Section

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Ross ◽  
C. Greenhalgh ◽  
D. P. McGlade ◽  
I. G. Balson ◽  
S. C. Chester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Obstetric Population

One hundred and forty-four patients receiving subarachnoid anaesthesia for caesarean section were prospectively analysed for quality of anaesthesia and the occurrence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH). Anaesthesia was administered via 24 gauge Sprotte (n = 104) and 26 gauge Quincke (n = 40) needles using hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with morphine 0.2 mg. Anaesthesia was successful in 103 patients with the Sprotte needle and 38 patients with the Quincke needle, and the operating conditions were considered to be excellent. Of the 104 patients in the Sprotte needle group there were ten with PDPH (9.6%), two of which were considered severe. Of the 40 patients in the Quincke needle group there were eight with PDPH (20%), three of which were considered severe. Despite the lower incidence of headache in the Sprotte needle group, this was not statistically significant (P>0.05), due to the difference in population size. We conclude that the 24 gauge Sprotte needle is associated with a comparatively low but clinically relevant incidence of headache in the obstetric population.

scholarly journals Epidural butorphanol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries: A comparative study with epidural tramadol

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
G P Deo ◽  
S K Shrestha ◽  
I N Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Epidural Injection ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group B

To compare the efficacy of epidural butorphanol and tramadol for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries. Randomized, controlled, double blind, prospective study conducted at Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Chitwan Medical College from September 1st 2015 to August 31st 2016. 60 patients of ASA Grade I and II of either sex, aged between 18-65 years willing for epidural analgesia for post operative analgesia were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group B- Butorphanol group and Group T- Tramadol group. Subjects of Group B received 2mg of Butorphanol and 0.25% Bupivacaine making a total volume of 10 ml and that of Group T received 100mg of Tramadol and 0.25% Bupivacaine also making a total volume of 10 ml. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The onset and duration of analgesia along with side effects were also assessed. The quality of analgesia was studied using time to independent mobilization and overall patient satisfaction. Total number of patients was 60, of ASA Grade I and II, aged between 18-65 years. The mean age of patients in Group B was 42.6±11.7 years and 46.1±11.2 years in Group T. Time of onset of analgesia after epidural injection was 7.4±0.9 minutes in Group B and 12.7±1.5 minutes in Group T and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Duration of analgesia was 317.1±99.1 minutes and 438.8±136.6 minutes in Butorphanol and Tramadol groups respectively which was also statistically significant. Sedation was significantly higher in butorphanol group whereas nausea and vomiting was higher in tramadol group. Quality of analgesia in terms of patient satisfaction was better with epidural butorphanol. Both epidural tramadol and butorphanol were effective in relieving post operative pain however butorphanol had lesser side effects and greater patient satisfaction compared to tramadol but the duration of action was relatively short.

scholarly journals A comparison of epidural analgesia provided by Bupivacaine plus Pethidine, Bupivacaine plus Morphine, or Bupivacaine plus Morphine plus Midazolam for lower limb Orthopaedic surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-21
Author(s):  
NR Sharma ◽  
U Rai ◽  
S Panthee ◽  
P Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Epidural Morphine ◽  
P Value ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Good Patient Satisfaction

Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in orthopaedic surgeries helps to prevent thromboembolic phenomenon by increasing venodynamics. Adequate post operative analgesia with good patient satisfaction has been observed with this technique. The objective of this study was to assess the duration of postoperative analgesia and complications in patients receiving epidural anesthesia with morphine, midazolam and pethidine in combination with bupivacaine. We prospectively studied 75 Patients who were scheduled for elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery with epidural anaesthesia. This study was conducted from March 2010 to March 2012 at Lumbini Medical College Palpa. They were randomly divided by lottery method into three equal groups. Group ‘A’ (BP) received 50 mg epidural pethidine (3 ml) with 0.5 % bupivacaine 13 ml. Group ‘ B’ (BM) received 5 mg (3 ml) epidural morphine with 13 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and Group’ C’ (BMM) received 5 mg (1 ml) epidural morphine with 13 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and 2 mg (2 ml) epidural midazolam. All the patients were observed for 24 hours for quality of analgesia and other side effects like nausea vomiting, and pruritus. Data were analysed by SPSS-16.0 software. The result of the study shows the duration of analgesia was prolonged in BMM group than BM, and BP group and was statistically significant (P value <0.001). Incidence of nausea and vomiting in BMM group was lower than that of BP and BM group but was statistically insignificantly (P value 0.489). Pruritus was absent in BP group and was more with BM and BMM group (P value 0.007). In conclusion the use of epidural morphine and midazolam in combination with bupivacaine is the satisfactory method of post operative analgesia. By adding midazolam, duration of analgesia can be increased with decrease in incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmc.v4i1.10842 Journal of Chitwan Medical College 2014; 4(1): 19-21

scholarly journals PERIOPERATIVE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL CLONIDINE AND FENTANYL WITH HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Suman Chattopadhyay ◽  
Mallika Datta ◽  
Biswanath Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Mechanisms Of Action ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Prolonged Duration ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

ABSTRACTObjectives: Intrathecal fentanyl and clonidine are effective analgesics with different mechanisms of action. This study compares 25 µg of both thesedrugs given intrathecally regarding onset, quality, and duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine-induced spinal block and side effects.Methods: A total of 90 patients of ASA I and II were randomly allocated into three equal groups. Group A received 0.5 ml of 0.9% normal saline(placebo), Group B and Group C received 25 µg fentanyl and clonidine intrathecally added to 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively. Theonset and regression time of sensory and motor blocks were recorded along with hemodynamic change, side effects, pain intensity (in terms of visualanalog score (VAS), and time to first rescue analgesic.Results: Intrathecal clonidine (25 μg) significantly prolongs sensory and motor blocks, with prolonged duration of analgesia in comparison withintrathecal fentanyl (25 µg) (325±15 minutes vs. 240±7.6 minutes). VAS score was similar, but sedation was more in clonidine group.Conclusion: We conclude that low-dose intrathecal clonidine is an effective adjuvant to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia and provides betterpostoperative analgesia in comparison with intrathecal fentanyl.Keywords: Clonidine, Fentanyl, Bupivacaine, Regional, Spinal, Postoperative pain.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF HAEMODYNAMIC STABILITY WITH 0.5% AND 0.75% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE DURING SPINAL ANAESTHESIA IN WOMEN UNDERGOING CAESAREAN SECTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2078-81
Author(s):  
Hina Iftikhar ◽  
Aneel Aslam ◽  
Habib Ur Rehman ◽  
Zulfiqar Ali ◽  
Mohammad Ali Abbass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Haemodynamic Stability ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Objective: To compare the effect of 0.5% and 0.75% hyperbaric Bupivacaine on haemodynamic stability in terms of mean systolic blood pressure and heart rate recorded at 4 min in patients undergoing caesarian section in spinal anesthesia. Study Design: Quasi experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesiology, Combined Military Hospital, Malir, from Jul to Dec 2018. Methodology: The patients were assigned in two groups (A and B) using lottery method. Group A received 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine solution. Group B received 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine solution. Spinal anaesthesia was given, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 23. Both groups were compared for mean systolic blood pressure and heart rate by using independent sample t-test. Results: The mean age of patients was 29.62 ± 6.21 years in 0.75% Bupivacaine group while 29.31 ± 6.20 years in 0.5% Bupivacaine group. The mean systolic blood pressure of patients was 111.63 ± 5.96 mmHg in 0.75% Bupivacaine group while 117.16 ± 7.12 mmHg in 0.5% Bupivacaine group. The difference was significant in both groups (p-value <0.05). The mean heart rate of patients was 92.27 ± 4.71 beats per min (bpm) in 0.75% Bupivacaine group while 97.68 ± 4.58 bpm in 0.5% Bupivacaine group. The difference was significant in both groups (p-value <0.05). Conclusion: 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine was better than 0.75% hyperbaric Bupivacaine solution in spinal anaesthesia during caesarean section.

scholarly journals Evaluating the effect of dexmedetomidine premedication on the quality of subarachnoid block, haemodynamics and sedation in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 5410
Author(s):  
Sandeep Sharma ◽  
Mahesh Somani ◽  
Madhan Chandramohan ◽  
Lalit Kumar Raiger
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Group D

Background: Present study was designed to evaluate the effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine on haemodynamics, sedation and quality of spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.Methods: Sixty ASA grade 1 and 2, 18-60 years aged patients scheduled for elective lower limb surgeries were randomly divided into two groups: Group C (Control) and Group D (Study), received intravenous normal saline 10ml and intravenous dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg in dilution of 10ml respectively over 10minutes duration, 10minutes before subarachnoid block with 2.5ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), quality of sensory and motor block and level of sedation were monitored intraoperatively and postoperatively.Results: The heart rate was statistically significantly decreased in group D both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Intraoperative and postoperative SBP and DBP were lower in dexmedetomidine group but clinically that was insignificant. Intraoperative Ramsay sedation scores were significantly higher in dexmedetomidine group (3.49±0.240) as compared to control group (2.51±0.249) (p<0.001) but the patients were easily arousable. The duration of sensory blockade (208.83±9.53 min vs 162.83±9.62 min), duration for 2 dermatomal regression of sensory blockade (146.5±10.013min vs 98±8.57min) and the duration for motor block regression to Modified Bromage scale 0 (167.33±10.5min vs 137.83±11.94min) were significantly prolonged in dexmedetomidine group as compared to control group. The highest level of sensory blockade was also significantly higher in dexmedetomidine group (T6.90±0.759 vs T7.60±0.621). There was no difference in the time for attaining highest level of sensory blockade, time taken for motor blockade to reach Modified Bromage Scale 3 between both the groups. Average 24hr mean VAS score was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group (1.37±0.15 vs1.72±0.17, p<0.001). Time to first request for rescue analgesic was also significantly longer in dexmedetomidine group (mean 174.33min vs 143.5min). Average 24hour consumption of tramadol analgesic was significantly higher in control group as compared to dexmedetomidine group (391.86±111.62mg vs 279.86±80.55mg, p<0.001).Conclusions: Intravenous dexmedetomidine significantly prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block of bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia. It provides excellent sedation and analgesia. Dexmedetomidine induced decrease in heart rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure are not clinically significant. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document