Ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness in third trimester and its correlation with estimated fetal weight and birth weight

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-06
Author(s):  
Alka Patil ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Placental Thickness ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Discrepancy Analysis between Clinical Versus Ultrasound Estimated Fetal Weight and Actual Birth Weight at 3rd Trimester

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Naznin Rashid Shewly ◽  
Menoka Ferdous ◽  
Hasina Begum ◽  
Shahadat Hossain Khan ◽  
Sheema Rani Debee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: In obstetric management fetal weight estimation is an important consideration when planning the mode of delivery in our day to day practice. In Bangladesh low birth weight is a major public health problem & incidence is 38% - 58%. Neonatal mortality and morbidity also yet high. So accurate antenatal estimation of fetal weight is a good way to detect macrosomia or small for date baby. Thus to improve the pregnancy outcome and neonatal outcome decreasing various chance of neonatal mortality and morbidity antenatal fetal weight prediction is an invaluable parameter in some situation where to identify the at risk pregnancy for low birth weight become necessary. Reliable method for prenatal estimation of fetal weight two modalities have got popularity - Clinical estimation and another one is ultrasonic estimation. This study was designed to determine the accuracy of clinical versus ultrasound estimated fetal weight detecting the discrepancy with actual birth weight at third trimester. So that we can verify more reliable and accurate method. Objectives: To find out more accurate and reliable modality of fetal weight estimation in antenatal period during obstetric management planning. To compare clinical versus ultrasound estimated fetal weight & to determine discrepancy of both variable with actual birth weight. Method: This prospective, cross sectional analytical study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January 2006 to December 2006. By purposive sampling 100 pregnant women fulfilling inclusion criteria were included in my study in third trimester (29wks-40wks). In clinical weight estimation procedure SFH (Symphysio Fundal Height) was measured in centimeter. On pervaginal finding whether vertex below or above the ischial spine was determined. By Johnson’s formula fetal weight in grams was estimated. Then by ultrasound scan different biometric measurements were taken and finally by Hadlock’s formula fetal weight was estimated. Eventually actual birth weight was taken after birth by Globe Brand weighing machine. Accuracy of both modalities were compared and which one was more reliable predictor was determined by statistical analysis. Results: After data collection were analyzed by computer based software (SPSS). There was gradual and positive relationship between symphysiofundal height and estimated birth weight. Discrepancy between clinical and actual birth weight at third trimester was statistically significant – Paired Student’s ‘t’ test was done where p value was <0.001. Whereas discrepancy between sonographically estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight was not statistically significant (by paired ‘t’ test where p value was >0.05). That implies discrepancy between ultrasound estimated fetal weight and actual birth weight was significantly less than that of clinically estimated fetal weight. 14% clinically and 46% sonographically estimated fetal weight were observed within £ 5% of actual birth weight. 31% clinical and 42% sonographically estimates observed within 6% to 10% of actual birth weight and 55% clinical and 12% sonographically estimate were >10% of actual birth weight. That is about 88% sonographical versus 45% clinical estimates were within 10% of actual birth weight. Conclusion: There is no doubt about importance of fetal weight in many obstetric situations. Clinical decisions at times depends on fetal weight. Whether to use oxytocin, to use forceps or vacuum for delivery or extend of trial or ended by Caesarian section immediately or no scope of trial to be largely depend on fetal size and weight. So more accurate modality for antenatal fetal weight estimation has paramount importance. In my study sonographically estimated weight have more accuracy than that of clinical estimate in predicting actual birth weight. Sonographically estimated fetal weight is more reliable, accurate and reproducible rather than other modality. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, June 2019, Vol.11(1); 32-38

scholarly journals Ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness and its correlation with estimated fetal weight

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 287
Author(s):  
Nasreen Noor ◽  
Akanksha Jain ◽  
Shazia Parveen ◽  
Syed Manazir Ali
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Antenatal Visit ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
Ultrasound Evaluation ◽  
Fetal Birth Weight ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Placental Thickness ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: The human placenta develops with the principal function of providing nutrients and oxygen to the fetus. Objective of present study was to assess the relationship between placental thickness with estimated fetal weight.Methods: The present study was a prospective observational study and includes 152 pregnant women with known last menstrual period, history of regular menstruation, singleton pregnancy and aged between 20 and 35 years. After Institutional Ethics Committee approval all recruited women were observed for baseline demographic and obstetric data including age, parity and past medical events at first antenatal visit. All women provided an informed written consent and underwent ultrasound evaluation of placental thickness at 18 to 40 weeks of gestation.Results: In the present study the mean placental thickness between the ranges of 18-40mm was 31.63±4.79mm and the mean estimated fetal birth weight was 2145.86±121.24grams. The pearson’s correlation coefficient between the two was 0.982. Thus, proving the significant positive correlation between placental thickness and estimated fetal birth weight (p-value <0.001).Conclusions: Estimated fetal weight is a very important component of antenatal care in which ultrasonography plays an important role. Placental thickness measured at the level of umblical cord insertion can be used as an accurate sonographic indicator in the assessment of fetal weight because of its linear correlation. Therefore, it can be used as an additional sonographic tool in assessing fetal weight.

scholarly journals Third trimester Sonographic estimated fetal weight - What factors affect its’ accuracy

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S164
Author(s):  
Michal Ovadia ◽  
Chen Key ◽  
Gal Cohen ◽  
Sivan Farladansky Gershnabel ◽  
Tal Biron-Shental ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

“A NOVEL ATTEMPT IN ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT USING NEW SOFT TISSUE MEASUREMENTS”

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Sathyan Gnanasigamani ◽  
Sudhakar Vadivel ◽  
Bala Subramaniam ◽  
Sakthivel Raja Ganesan ◽  
Pradeebaa Thiyagarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Ultrasound Measurement ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Tissue Thickness ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Soft Tissue Thickness

Background: The Accurate estimation of fetal weight is important in modern obstetrics. Currently, Hadlock's formula is used widely for fetal weight estimation, which includes BPD, AC, FL and HC. The correct plane of measurement of various standard parameters is difcult to obtain especially in third trimester. Hence soft tissue thicknesses of the fetus are tested for correlation with birth weight in this study. Materials & Methods: A prospective observational study conducted among 90 pregnant females referred for Ultrasound examination in the third trimester with an interval from the ultrasound scan to delivery of ≤7 days from 2019 to 2020. Results: The measurements of abdominal, fetal mid-thigh and mid-arm soft tissue thicknesses correlated well with birth weight in a high statistically signicant positive linear relationship. A new regression model developed out of the soft tissue thicknesses(FASTT, FMASTT, FTSTT) correlates better than the Hadlock's model and Sujitkumar Hiwale et al model (For Indian population) based on BPD, HC, AC and FL Conclusion: Ultrasound measurement of soft tissue thickness may prove to be a strong predictor of fetal weight essential for sonographic assessment of pregnancy. They are easy and simple hence fetal soft tissue thickness measurements, both two- and three-dimensional, may prove to be a diagnostic parameter that has as small an error rate as possible, is quick to use and reproducible by different examiners

THE RELATIONSHIP OF PLACENTAL THICKNESS WITHGESTATIONALAGE IN THIRD TRIMESTER AND PROBABLE FETAL OUTCOME

2021 ◽  
pp. 64-66
Author(s):  
Sambhunath Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Ritayan Sasmal ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Age Determination ◽  
Fetal Outcome ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Placental Thickness

Accurate gestational age determination is very important for management of continuation and termination planning of the pregnancy. rd To establish placental thickness as a parameter for determination of gestational age and fetal growth pattern at 3 trimester. 100 primigravida women who are fullling the inclusion criteria and attend gynae &obs OPD or admitted in their third trimester at IPGME&R from January 2017 to june 2018. Placental thickness at 3rd trimester USG scan is moderately correlated with gestational age, if placental thickness expressed in millimeter then it correlated with gestational age at weeks. rd st Placental thickness with >3.2 cm (32 mm) at 3 trimester almost associated with good fetal outcome, with APGAR score >8 at 1 min and birth weight >2500 gm.

Fetal weight estimation by automated three-dimensional limb volume model in late third trimester compared to two-dimensional model: a cross-sectional prospective observational study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xining Wu ◽  
Zihan Niu ◽  
Zhonghui Xu ◽  
Yuxin Jiang ◽  
Yixiu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
3D Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Limb Volume ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Volume Model ◽  
Estimated Error ◽  
2D Model

Abstract Background: Accurate estimation of fetal weight is important for prenatal care and for detection of fetal growth abnormalities. Prediction of fetal weight entails the indirect measurement of fetal biometry by ultrasound that is then introduced into formulae to calculate the estimated fetal weight. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the automated three-dimensional(3D) fractional limb volume model to predict fetal weight in the third trimester.Methods: Prospective 2D and 3D ultrasonography were performed among women with singleton pregnancies 7 days before delivery to obtain 2D data, including fetal biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur length, as well as 3D data, including the fractional arm volume (AVol) and fractional thigh volume (TVol). The fetal weight was estimated using the 2D model and the 3D fractional limb volume model respectively. Percentage error = (estimated fetal weight - actual birth weight) ÷ actual birth weight × 100. Systematic errors (accuracy) were evaluated as the mean percentage error (MPE). Random errors (precision) were calculated as±1 SD of percentage error.Results: Ultrasound examination was performed on 56 fetuses at 39.6 ± 1.4 weeks gestation. The average birth weight of the newborns was 3393 ± 530 g. The average fetal weight estimated by the 2D model was 3478 ± 467 g, and the MPE was 3.2 ± 8.9. The average fetal weights estimated by AVol and TVol of the 3D model were 3268 ± 467 g and 3250 ± 485 g, respectively, and the MPEs were -3.3 ± 6.6 and -3.9 ± 6.1, respectively. For the 3D TVol model, the proportion of fetuses with estimated error ≤ 5% was significantly higher than that of the 2D model (55.4% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.05). For fetuses with a birth weight < 3500 g, the accuracy of the AVol and TVol models were better than the 2D model (-0.8 vs. 7.0 and -2.8 vs. 7.0, both p < 0.05). Moreover, for these fetus, the proportions of estimated error ≤ 5% of the AVol and TVol models were 58.1% and 64.5%, respectively, significantly higher than that of the 2D model (19.4%) (both p < 0.05). The consistency of different examiners measuring fetal AVol and TVol were satisfactory,with the intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.921 and 0.963, respectively.Conclusion: In this cohort,the automated 3D fractional limb volume model improves the accuracy of weight estimation in most third-trimester fetuses. In particular, the 3D model estimation accuracy for fetuses with weight < 3500 g is significantly higher than that of the traditional 2D model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document