Correlation between the APACHE IV score and predicted mortality rate in obstetrics and gynaecology admissions in ICU

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Bhavani M H ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Apache Iv

scholarly journals Predictive Performance of two Measures of Prognostic Mortality of Cancer Patients in Intensive Care Unit in Jordan: A Comparative Single-Centre Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-173
Author(s):  
Issa M. Almansour ◽  
Mohammad K. Aldalaykeh ◽  
Zyad T. Saleh ◽  
Khalil M. Yousef ◽  
Mohammad M. Alnaeem
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Actual Mortality ◽  
Apache Iv

Background: Information is presently insufficient about using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) mortality predicting models for cancer patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Objective: To evaluates the performance of APACHE II and IV in predicting mortality for cancer patients in ICU. Interventions/Methods: This was a retrospective study including adult patients admitted to an ICU in a medical center in Jordan. Actual mortality rate was determined and compared with mortality rates predicted by APACHE II and IV models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive performance of both scores. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the effect that APACHE II, APACHE IV and other sample characteristics have on predicting mortality. Results: 251 patients (survived=80; none-survived=171) were included in the study with an actual mortality rate of 68.1%. APACHE II and APACHE IV scores demonstrated similar predicted mortality rates (43.3% vs. 43.0%), sensitivity (52.6% vs. 52.0%), and specificity (76.3%, 76.2%), respectively. The area under (AUC), the ROC curve for APACHE II score was 0.714 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.645–0.783), and AUC for APACHE IV score was 0.665 (95% CI 0.595–0.734). Conclusions: As APACHE ӀӀ and ӀV mortality models demonstrate insufficient predicting performance, there is no need to consider APACHE IV in our ICU instead of using APACHE ӀӀ as it has more variables and need longer data extraction time. Implications for Practice: We suggest that other approaches in addition to the available models should be attempted to improve the accuracy of cancer prognosis in ICU. Further, it is also required to adjust the available models.

scholarly journals Mortality rate in patients admitted to the ICU based on LODS, APACHE IV, TRIOS, SAPS II‎

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62
Author(s):  
Mahzad Yousefian ◽  
Ahmad Ghazi ◽  
Firouz Amani ◽  
Bita Movaffagh
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Apache Iv

Surgical and endovascular hybrid approach in peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs

VASA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk Grandjean ◽  
Katia Iglesias ◽  
Céline Dubuis ◽  
Sébastien Déglise ◽  
Jean-Marc Corpataux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Limb Salvage Rate ◽  
Peripheral Arterial ◽  
Salvage Rate

Abstract. Background: Multilevel peripheral arterial disease is frequently observed in patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia. This report evaluates the efficacy of one-stage hybrid revascularization in patients with multilevel arterial peripheral disease. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database included all consecutive patients treated by a hybrid approach for a multilevel arterial peripheral disease. The primary outcome was the patency rate at 6 months and 1 year. Secondary outcomes were early and midterm complication rate, limb salvage and mortality rate. Statistical analysis, including a Kaplan-Meier estimate and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out with the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency, comparing the impact of various risk factors in pre- and post-operative treatments. Results: 64 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 428 days (range: 4 − 1140). The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 1 year were 39 %, 66 % and 81 %, respectively. The limb-salvage rate was 94 %. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Early and midterm complication rates were 15.4 % and 6.4 %, respectively. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Conclusions: The hybrid approach is a major alternative in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease in multilevel disease and comorbid patients, with low complication and mortality rates and a high limb-salvage rate.

Darmkrebs-OP: Auf die Erfahrung kommt es an

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (04) ◽  
pp. 162-164
Author(s):  
Frank Lichert
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Volume ◽  
Rectum Resection

Diers J et al. Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectum resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany. BJS Open 2020; doi:10.1002/bjs5.50254

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document