Quality of a quantum error correcting scheme and memory error threshold estimation

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 516-526
Author(s):  
P.J. Salas
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Fault Tolerant ◽  
Quality Criterion ◽  
Error Threshold ◽  
Quantum Code ◽  
Threshold Estimation ◽  
Memory Error ◽  
Quantum Error ◽  
Recovery Schemes

The error correcting capabilities of the Calderbank-Shor-Steane [[7,1,3]] quantum code, together with a fault-tolerant syndrome extraction by means of several ancilla states, have been numerically studied. A simple probability expression to characterize the code ability for correcting an encoded qubit has been considered. This probability, as a correction quality criterion, permits the error correction capabilities among different recovery schemes to be compared. The memory error threshold is calculated by means of the best method of those considered.

scholarly journals ERROR THRESHOLD ESTIMATION BY MEANS OF THE [[7,1,3]] CSS QUANTUM CODE

2005 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 371-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. SALAS ◽  
A. L. SANZ
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Computation ◽  
Error Probability ◽  
Fault Tolerant ◽  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Quantum Code ◽  
Threshold Estimation ◽  
Control Error ◽  
Threshold Conditions ◽  
Quantum Error ◽  
Depolarizing Channel

The states needed in quantum computation are extremely affected by decoherence. Several methods have been proposed to control error spreading. They use two main tools: fault-tolerant constructions and concatenated quantum error correcting codes. In this work, we estimate the threshold conditions necessary to make a long enough quantum computation. The [[7,1,3]] CSS quantum code together with the Shor method to measure the error syndrome is used. No concatenation is included. The decoherence is introduced by means of the depolarizing channel error model, obtaining several thresholds from the numerical simulation. Regarding the maintenance of a qubit stabilized in the memory, the error probability must be smaller than 2.9 × 10-5. In order to implement a one or two-qubit encoded gate in an effective fault-tolerant way, it is possible to choose an adequate non-encoded noisy gate if the memory error probability is smaller than 1.3 × 10-5. In addition, fulfilling this last condition permits us to assume a more efficient behavior compared to the equivalent non-encoded process.

scholarly journals Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction

Nature ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 595 (7867) ◽  
pp. 383-387
Author(s):  
◽  
Zijun Chen ◽  
Kevin J. Satzinger ◽  
Juan Atalaya ◽  
Alexander N. Korotkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Error Detection ◽  
Fault Tolerant ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Quantum Error Correction ◽  
Superconducting Qubits ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Logical Error ◽  
Quantum Error ◽  
Logical Qubit

AbstractRealizing the potential of quantum computing requires sufficiently low logical error rates1. Many applications call for error rates as low as 10−15 (refs. 2–9), but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10−3 (refs. 10–14). Quantum error correction15–17 promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits in such a way that errors can be detected and corrected. Errors on the encoded logical qubit state can be exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold and stable over the course of a computation. Here we implement one-dimensional repetition codes embedded in a two-dimensional grid of superconducting qubits that demonstrate exponential suppression of bit-flip or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round more than 100-fold when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analysing error correlations with high precision, allowing us to characterize error locality while performing quantum error correction. Finally, we perform error detection with a small logical qubit using the 2D surface code on the same device18,19 and show that the results from both one- and two-dimensional codes agree with numerical simulations that use a simple depolarizing error model. These experimental demonstrations provide a foundation for building a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computer with superconducting qubits.

scholarly journals Theory of quasi-exact fault-tolerant quantum computing and valence-bond-solid codes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongsheng Wang ◽  
Yunjiang Wang ◽  
Ningping Cao ◽  
Bei Zeng ◽  
Raymond Lafflamme
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Quantum Computation ◽  
Fault Tolerant ◽  
Valence Bond ◽  
Quantum Error Correction ◽  
Quantum Codes ◽  
Error Correction Codes ◽  
Exact Quantum ◽  
Valence Bond Solid ◽  
Quantum Error

Abstract In this work, we develop the theory of quasi-exact fault-tolerant quantum (QEQ) computation, which uses qubits encoded into quasi-exact quantum error-correction codes (``quasi codes''). By definition, a quasi code is a parametric approximate code that can become exact by tuning its parameters. The model of QEQ computation lies in between the two well-known ones: the usual noisy quantum computation without error correction and the usual fault-tolerant quantum computation, but closer to the later. Many notions of exact quantum codes need to be adjusted for the quasi setting. Here we develop quasi error-correction theory using quantum instrument, the notions of quasi universality, quasi code distances, and quasi thresholds, etc. We find a wide class of quasi codes which are called valence-bond-solid codes, and we use them as concrete examples to demonstrate QEQ computation.

Quantum Error Correction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd A. Brun
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Quantum Computation ◽  
Single Photon ◽  
Error Correcting Code ◽  
Quantum Systems ◽  
Quantum Error Correction ◽  
The State ◽  
Quantum States ◽  
Quantum Code ◽  
Quantum Error

Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information—that is, quantum states—from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Most work on quantum error correction has focused on systems of quantum bits, or qubits, which are two-level quantum systems. These can be physically realized by the states of a spin-1/2 particle, the polarization of a single photon, two distinguished levels of a trapped atom or ion, the current states of a microscopic superconducting loop, or many other physical systems. The most widely used codes are the stabilizer codes, which are closely related to classical linear codes. The code space is the joint +1 eigenspace of a set of commuting Pauli operators on n qubits, called stabilizer generators; the error syndrome is determined by measuring these operators, which allows errors to be diagnosed and corrected. A stabilizer code is characterized by three parameters [[n,k,d]], where n is the number of physical qubits, k is the number of encoded logical qubits, and d is the minimum distance of the code (the smallest number of simultaneous qubit errors that can transform one valid codeword into another). Every useful code has n>k; this physical redundancy is necessary to detect and correct errors without disturbing the logical state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design. Other approaches to error mitigation in quantum systems include decoherence-free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and dynamical decoupling.

scholarly journals Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Blume-Kohout ◽  
John King Gamble ◽  
Erik Nielsen ◽  
Kenneth Rudinger ◽  
Jonathan Mizrahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Information ◽  
Fault Tolerance ◽  
Error Correction ◽  
Error Rate ◽  
Fault Tolerant ◽  
Fast Algorithms ◽  
Quantum Error Correction ◽  
Qubit Operations ◽  
Quantum Error ◽  
Qubit Operation

Abstract Quantum information processors promise fast algorithms for problems inaccessible to classical computers. But since qubits are noisy and error-prone, they will depend on fault-tolerant quantum error correction (FTQEC) to compute reliably. Quantum error correction can protect against general noise if—and only if—the error in each physical qubit operation is smaller than a certain threshold. The threshold for general errors is quantified by their diamond norm. Until now, qubits have been assessed primarily by randomized benchmarking, which reports a different error rate that is not sensitive to all errors, and cannot be compared directly to diamond norm thresholds. Here we use gate set tomography to completely characterize operations on a trapped-Yb+-ion qubit and demonstrate with greater than 95% confidence that they satisfy a rigorous threshold for FTQEC (diamond norm ≤6.7 × 10−4).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document