scholarly journals The effects of molybdenum water concentration on feedlot performance, tissue mineral concentrations, and carcass quality of feedlot steers1,2,3

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 2758-2766
Author(s):  
M. J. Kistner ◽  
J. J. Wagner ◽  
J. Evans ◽  
S. Chalberg ◽  
S. Jalali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Concentration ◽  
Carcass Quality ◽  
Feedlot Performance ◽  
Mineral Concentrations

The effects of molybdenum water concentration on feedlot performance, tissue mineral concentrations, and carcass quality of feedlot steers

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 2758
Author(s):  
M. J. Kistner ◽  
J. J. Wagner ◽  
J. Evans ◽  
S. Chalberg ◽  
S. Jalali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Concentration ◽  
Carcass Quality ◽  
Feedlot Performance ◽  
Feedlot Steers ◽  
Mineral Concentrations

Subsequent Feedlot Performance and Carcass Quality of Steers that Grazed Tall Fescue with Different Endophyte Types

cftm ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. Duckett ◽  
John G. Andrae ◽  
Joseph H. Bouton ◽  
Carl S. Hoveland ◽  
Mark A. McCann
Keyword(s):  
Tall Fescue ◽  
Carcass Quality ◽  
Feedlot Performance

scholarly journals Effects of protein levels and energy sources in total mixed ration on feedlot performance and carcass quality of Kamphaeng Saen steers

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoompong Boonsaen ◽  
Nann Winn Soe ◽  
Wisut Maitreejet ◽  
Sutisa Majarune ◽  
Taweeporn Reungprim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Sources ◽  
Carcass Quality ◽  
Feedlot Performance ◽  
Total Mixed Ration ◽  
Protein Levels

scholarly journals 74 Stocker management and impacts on health and subsequent feedlot performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 23-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A Beck ◽  
Gerald Horn ◽  
Elizabeth B Kegley ◽  
Jeremy G Powell ◽  
Daniel Rivera
Keyword(s):  
Carcass Quality ◽  
Beef Industry ◽  
Feedlot Performance ◽  
Subsequent Performance ◽  
Feeder Cattle ◽  
Stocker Cattle ◽  
Beef Products ◽  
Cattle Health

Abstract The stocker segment of the beef industry provides significant enterprise services. The stocker industry provides a shock absorber to absorb the bulk of the cattle not ready for finishing in the numbers glut in the fall and helps provide a year around supply of feeder cattle. Other benefits include adding size to small and medium frame cattle to allow them to finish at acceptable weights, grouping cattle from small herds into semiload lots, and improved health and resilience to the stressors of changing diets, management, and environment. Health during receiving to the finishing phase has been shown to impact finishing performance and carcass quality, so the effects of stocker management can have serious implications on long-term economics of the feedlot enterprise and consumer acceptance of beef products. Ratliff et al. (2014) compiled data from Arkansas receiving and stocker grazing experiments and found that calves coming into the receiving unit as bulls were more likely to experience 2nd and 3rd pulls for bovine respiratory disease and had lower gains during grazing than calves coming in as steers. Records from research trials conducted in Mississippi and Arkansas found a 6 to 14% reduction in ADG for calves that had been treated for BRD once vs two times or more, respectively. There is much less data that considers the health outcomes of calves received as light weight stocker cattle and how this impacts subsequent performance during finishing. Timing of application of growth promoting technologies during the stocker phase has been shown to affect response to implants during finishing and carcass quality, but little data is available regarding stocker cattle health and finishing performance. More research is needed to ascertain what determines the quality of the health intervention outcomes for individual animals and the subsequent implications of health in the stocker phase

scholarly journals Growing rate of gain on subsequent feedlot performance, meat, and carcass quality of beef steers1

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (11) ◽  
pp. 3791-3797 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Loken ◽  
R. J. Maddock ◽  
M. M. Stamm ◽  
C. S. Schauer ◽  
I. Rush ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcass Quality ◽  
Feedlot Performance

The Effect of Feeding System on the Carcass Quality of Crossbred Lambs with Texel

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Angela Cividini ◽  
Dušan Terčič ◽  
Mojca Simčič
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Meat Quality ◽  
Carcass Quality ◽  
Quality Traits ◽  
Feeding System ◽  
Ad Libitum ◽  
Daily Gain ◽  
Effect Of Feeding ◽  
Carcass Cuts

The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of feeding system on the growth rate and carcass quality of crossbred Improved Jezersko-Solčava x Texel (JSRT) lambs and to evaluate the effect of sex on these traits. The trial was conducted in nature according to the traditional rearing systems. The trial included 44 crossbred lambs, which were born and reared until the slaughter in three different flocks. In the age of 10 days suckled lambs were offered with ad libitum corresponding diets according to the feeding system. All lambs were slaughtered in seven consecutive days by the same procedure. The effect of feeding system significantly affected daily gain from birth to slaughter, EUROP carcass conformation and shoulder width. Likewise, the effect of sex significantly affected daily gain from birth to slaughter and internal fatness of carcasses. According to carcass cuts the feeding system significantly affected only the proportion of neck and leg. Considering meat quality traits, feeding system had a significant effect on the pH 45 and CIE a* values. In this study, we could speculate that more than the feeding system the growth and the carcass traits as well as meat traits were affected by the amount of the supplement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document