Enteric methane and carbon dioxide emissions measured using respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique, and a GreenFeed head-chamber system from beef heifers fed alfalfa silage at three allowances and four feeding frequencies1–3

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 4326-4337 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jonker ◽  
G. Molano ◽  
C. Antwi ◽  
G. C. Waghorn
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emissions ◽  
Sulfur Hexafluoride ◽  
Tracer Technique ◽  
Chamber System ◽  
Beef Heifers ◽  
Enteric Methane ◽  
Alfalfa Silage

Reliability of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for methane emission measurement from individual animals: an overview

2008 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 223 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Pinares-Patiño ◽  
H. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Sulfur Hexafluoride ◽  
Emission Measurement ◽  
Ch4 Emission ◽  
Tracer Technique ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Animal Training ◽  
Enteric Methane ◽  
Free Ranging ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Cattle And Sheep

Measurements of enteric methane (CH4) emissions from individual animals have traditionally been made with indirect calorimetry techniques, which are both accurate and reliable. However, the expense and need for animal training and the extent to which calorimetric results can be extrapolated to free-ranging animals have been questioned and stimulated the development of the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique. The tracer technique is now widely used in New Zealand and many other countries for CH4 emission measurements on grazing and pen-fed cattle, sheep, deer and alpacas. Few studies with cattle and sheep have examined the validity of the SF6 tracer technique. Most of these studies have concluded that estimations of CH4 emission by this technique do not differ from those of calorimetric techniques, though some exceptions have been reported. There is general agreement that the tracer technique is associated with large between-animal variability in the CH4 emission estimates from animals on the same diet, but it remains unknown whether this is due to the environment, housing conditions or the technique itself. High within-animal variability has also been reported from tracer CH4 measurements. There is growing evidence that CH4 emission estimates by the tracer technique are positively influenced by the permeation rate (PR) of the SF6 gas from permeation tubes and it has been suggested that fate of the tracer in the rumen rather than unrepresentative breath sample collection is the likely reason for the latter. It is concluded that although some issues related to the tracer technique need to be clarified, using a narrow range in PR and balancing of PR between treatments should be practised in order to overcome the relationship between PR and CH4 emission estimates.

Methane and carbon dioxide emissions and grazed forage intake from pregnant beef heifers previously classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghader Manafiazar ◽  
Thomas K. Flesch ◽  
Vern S. Baron ◽  
Lisa McKeown ◽  
Brittany Byron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Co2 Emissions ◽  
Feed Intake ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emissions ◽  
Residual Feed Intake ◽  
Beef Heifers ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Forage Intake ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
Fecal Sampling

Objectives were to quantify the effect of post-weaning residual feed intake (RFI) on subsequent grazed forage intake, methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Beef heifers classified for RFI adjusted for off-test backfat (RFIfat; 55 high and 56 low) at nine mo of age were monitored seven mo later for CH4 and CO2 emissions using the GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring system. Fifty-six of these heifers were also monitored as high and low RFIfat groups using Open Path Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (OP-FTIR). Heifers were dosed with one kg of C32 labelled pellets once daily for 15 d, with twice daily fecal sampling the last eight d to determine individual grazed forage intake using the n-alkane method. Low RFIfat pregnant heifers consumed less forage (10.25 vs. 10.81 kg DM d-1; P < 0.001), and emitted less daily CH4 (238.7 vs. 250.7 g d-1; P = 0.009) and CO2 (7578 vs. 8041 g d-1; P < 0.001) compared with high RFIfat animals. Results from the OP-FTIR further confirmed that low RFIfat heifers emitted 6.3% less (g d-1; P = 0.006) CH4 compared to their high RFIfat cohorts. Thus, selection for low RFIfat will decrease daily CH4 and CO2 emissions from beef cattle.

Methane and carbon dioxide emissions from yearling beef heifers and mature cows classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 522-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Manafiazar ◽  
V.S. Baron ◽  
L. McKeown ◽  
H. Block ◽  
K. Ominski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Feed Intake ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emissions ◽  
Body Weight Gain ◽  
Residual Feed Intake ◽  
Individual Performance ◽  
Feed Consumption ◽  
Beef Heifers ◽  
Air Temperatures ◽  
Rapid City

This study quantified methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) production from beef heifers and cows classified for residual feed intake adjusted for off-test backfat thickness (RFIfat) and reared in drylot during cold winter temperatures. Individual performance, daily feed intake, and RFIfat were obtained for 1068 crossbred and purebred yearling heifers (eight trials) as well as 176 crossbred mature cows (six trials) during the winters of 2015–2017 at two locations. A portion of these heifers (147 high RFIfat; 167 low RFIfat) and cows (69 high RFIfat; 70 low RFIfat) was monitored for enteric CH4 and CO2 emissions using the GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) system (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD, USA). Low RFIfat cattle consumed less feed [heifers, 7.80 vs. 8.48 kg dry matter (DM) d−1; cows, 11.64 vs. 13.16 kg DM d−1] and emitted less daily CH4 (2.5% for heifers; 3.7% for cows) and CO2 (1.4% for heifers; 3.4% for cows) compared with high RFIfat cattle. However, low RFIfat heifers and cows had higher CH4 (6.2% for heifers; 9.9% for cows) and CO2 yield (7.3% for heifers; 9.8% for cows) per kilogram DM intake compared with their high RFIfat pen mates. The GEM system performed at air temperatures between +20 and −30 °C. Feed intake of heifers and mature cows was differently affected by ambient temperature reduction between +20 and −15 °C and similarly increased their feed intake at temperatures below −15 °C. In conclusion, low RFIfat animals emit less daily enteric CH4 and CO2, due mainly to lower feed consumption at equal body weight, gain, and fatness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document